The end(s) of critique: Data behaviourism versus due process

Privacy Due Process and the Computational Turn: The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 143-167

  Rouvroy, Antoinette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917399654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203427644     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Abensour, M. (2010) L’homme est un animal utopique, Paris: Les editions de la nuit.
2. Agamben, G. (2002) Enfance et histoire. Destruction de l’expérience et origine de l’histoire, Paris: Payot & Rivages.
3. Althusser, L. (1971) ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’, in L enin and philosophy, and other Essays, New York: Monthly Review Press: 127-186.
4. Artaud, A. (2004) 50 dessins pour assasiner la magie, Préface d’Evelyne Grossman, Paris: Gallimard.
5. Ayres, I. (2007) Super Crunchers: Why thinking-by-numbers is the new way to be smart, New York: Random House.
6. Benjamin, W. (2000) Oeuvres, III, Paris: Gallimard.
7. Bentham, J. (1843) ‘Nomography. The art of inditing laws’, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the superintendence of his executor, John Bowring, Edinburgh: William Tait: 1838 - 43.
8. Boltanski, L. (2009) D e la critique. Précis de sociologie de l'émancipation, Paris: Gallimard.
9. Boltanski, L. And Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justifi cation: Economies of worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bourriaud, N. (1994) ‘Le paradigme esthétique’, Chimères (21).
11. Bouveresse, J. (1993) L’homme probable. Robert Musil, le hasard, la moyenne et l’escargot de l’histoire, Paris: L’éclat.
12. Butler, J. (2000) Antigone’s Claim. Kinship between life and death, N ew York: Columbia University Press.
13. Butler, J. (2005) Giving an account of oneself, New York: Fordham University Press.
14. Citton, Y. (2010) L’avenir des humanités. Economie de la connaissance ou cultures de l’interpretation, Paris: La découverte.
15. Cléro, J. P. (2007) ‘Quelques diffi cultés symptomatiques de la théorie benthamienne des fi ctions’, Cahiers critiques de philosophie (4).
16. Cukier, K. (2010) ‘Data, Data Everywhere. Interview with Kenneth Cukier’, The Economist, 25 February, available at https://www.economist.com/node/15557443.
17. Deleuze, G. (2003) S pinoza. Philosophie pratique, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
18. Deleuze, G. And Guattari, F. (1980) M ille plateaux, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
19. Deleuze, G. And Parnet, C. (1996) D ialogues, Paris: Flammarion.
20. Derrida, J. (1990) ‘Force of Law: The “mystical foundation of authority”’, Cardozo Law Review (11), 919 - 1045.
21. Desrosières, A. (2008) Gouverner par les nombres. L’argument statistique II, Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines.
22. Desrosières, A. (2010) ‘Est-il bon, est-il méchant? Le role du nombre dans le gouvernement de la cite néolibérale’, communication at the workshop L’informazione prima dell’informazione. Conoscenza e scelte pubbliche, Université de Milan Bicocca, 27 mai 2010.
23. Didi-Huberman, G. (2009) Q uand les images prennent position. L’oeil de l’histoire, I, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
24. Eco, U. (1976) A Theory of Semiotics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25. Fischbach, F. (2011) La privation du monde. Temps, espace et capital, Paris: Vrin.
26. Foucault, M. (1990) ‘Qu’est-ce que la critique?’, Proceedings of the session of 27 May 1978, Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie.
27. General Accounting Office (2004) ‘D ata Mining: Federal Efforts Cover a Wide Range of Uses’. Reports & Testimony Newsletter, Stonehenge International.
28. Genosko, G. (2008) ‘Banco sur Félix. Signes partiels a-signifi ants et technologie de l’information’, M ultitudes (34): 63-73.
29. Gonzalez Fuster, G., Gutwirth, S. And Ellyne, E. (2010) ‘Profi ling in the European Union: A high-risk practice’, I NEX policy brief, (10).
30. Guattari, F. (1977) Révolution moléculaire, Paris: Recherches.
31. Haber, S. (2007) L’aliénation. Vie sociale et expérience de la dépossession, Paris: Puf.
32. Henman, P. (2011) ‘Conditional Citizenship? Electronic networks and the new conditionality in public policy’, Policy & Internet, vol 3, Issue 3, A rticle 5, http://www.psocommons.org/policyandinternet/vol3/iss3/art5/?sending=11513.
33. Hohfeld, W. (1913) ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’, Yale Law Journal (23): 16.
34. Laplace, P.-S. (1814) Essai philosophique sur les probabilités, Paris: Courcier.
35. Leblanc, G. (2007) Les maladies de l’homme normal, Paris: Editions du Passant.
36. Legendre, P. (2001) De la société comme texte. Linéaments d’une anthropologie dogmatique, Paris: Fayard.
37. Nancy, J.-L. (2010) L’adoration (Déconstruction du christianisme, II), Paris: Galilée.
38. Neyrat, F. (2008) Biopolitique des catastrophes, Paris: Mf.
39. Neyrat, F. (2009) Instructions pour une prise d’âmes. Artaud et l’envoûtement occidental, Paris: La Phocide.
40. Neyrat, F. (2011) ‘Désajointement’, Variations, (15), available at http://variations.revues.org/91.
41. Quetelet, A. (1835) S ur l’homme et le développement de ses facultés, ou Essai de physique sociale, Paris: Bachelier.
42. Ronell, A. (2005) Test Drive, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
43. Rouvroy, A. (2011A) ‘Epilogue - Technological mediation and human agency as recalcitrance’, in Hildebrandt, M. And Rouvroy, A. (Eds) L aw, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing. Philosophers of law meet philosophers of technology, Abingdon: Routledge.
44. Rouvroy, A. (2011B) ‘Governmentality in an Age of Autonomic Computing: Technology, virtuality and utopia’, in Hildebrandt, M. And Rouvroy, A. (Eds) L aw, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing. Philosophers of law meet philosophers of technology, Abingdon: Routledge.
45. Rouvroy, A. (2012) ‘Face à la gouvernementalité algorithmique, repenser le sujet de droit comme puissance’, available at http://works.bepress.com/antoinetterouvroy/43.
46. Rouvroy, A. And Berns, T. (2010) ‘Le nouveau pouvoir statistique’, M ultitudes, 40: 88-103.
47. Sarat, A. (1995) ‘A Prophecy of Possibility: Metaphorical explorations of postmodern legal subjectivity’, L aw and Society Review, (29) 4.
48. Spinoza, B. (1990) Ethique, III, scolie 2, Paris: Puf.
49. Supiot, A. (2010) L’esprit de Philadelphie. La justice sociale face au marché total, P aris: Seuil.
50. U.S. General Accounting Office (2004) Data Mining: Federal Efforts Cover a Wide Range of Uses. Gao-04-548, Washington D.C.
51. Vidal, J. (2008) La fabrique de l’impuissance. 1. La gauche, les intellectuels et le liberalism sécuritaire, Paris: Editions.
52. Zarsky, T. (2011) ‘Governmental Data Mining and its Alternatives’, Penn State Law Review, (116) 2: 285 - 330.