Using discourse analysis to improve classroom interaction

Using Discourse Analysis to Improve Classroom Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-163

  Rex, Lesley A ^a   Schiller, Laura ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917386662     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203876985     Document Type: Book

References (43)

1. Allington, Richard (2002). What I've learned about effective reading instruction from a decade of studying exemplary elementary classroom teachers. Phi Delta Kappan (83) June 10, 740-747.
2. Applebee, Arthur N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M.,Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280-312.
4. Rex, L. A.,Green, J. L. (2007). Classroom Discourse and Interaction: Reading across the traditions. In B. Spolsky F. M. Hult (Eds.). International handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 571-584) London: Blackwell
5. Sarangi, S.,Roberts, C. (Eds.) (1999). Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6. McCabe, M. (2006). Enhancing face value: A description of teacher and student negotiation of power and politeness in a one-to-one first-grade reading intervention. Unpublished dissertation. University of Michigan.
7. Locher, M. (2004). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.
8. Steffe, L. P.,Gale, J. E. (1995). Constructivism in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Green, J. L.,Dixon, D. (1993). Introduction to talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and education, 5(3-4), 231-240).
10. Rex, L. A.,McEachen, D. (1999). "If anything is odd, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it's probably important": The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices. Research in the teaching of English, 34(1), 65-129.
11. Rex, L. A. (2001). The remaking of a high school reader. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 288-314).
12. Brown, P. ,Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.
14. O'Driscoll, J. (1996). About face: A defense and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(1), 1-32.
15. Iles, Z. (1996). Collaborative repair in EFL classroom talk. York Papers in Linguistics, 17, 23-51.
16. Liebscher, G.,Daileyocain, J. (2003). Conversational repair as a role-defining mechanism in classroom interaction. Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 375-390.
17. Cohen, E. G.,Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99-120.
18. Watts, R. (1991). Power in family discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Newmann, F. M., Secada, W. G.,Wehlage, G. G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: Vision, standards and scoring. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
20. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M.,Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280-312.
21. Rex, L. A. (Ed.) (2006). Discourse of opportunity: How talk in learning situations creates and constrains. Interactional Ethnographic Studies in Teaching and Learning. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22. Lamb, S. M. (2000). Neuro-cognitive structure in the interplay of language and thought. In Martin Pütz and Marjolijn H. Verspoor (Eds.) Explorations in linguistic relativity. New York: John Benjamins. Also appears at http:// www.ruf.rice.edu/~lamb/lt.htm
23. Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow.
24. Rex, L. A. (2003). Loss of the creature: The obscuring of inclusivity. Communication Education, 52(1), 30-46.
25. Rex, L. A. (2006). Acting "cool" and "appropriate": Toward a framework for considering literacy classroom interactions when race is a factor. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 275-325.
26. Rex, L. A.Nelson, M. (2004). How teachers' professional identities position high stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1288-1331.
27. Rex, L. A. (2001). The remaking of a high school reader. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 288-314.
28. Rex, L. A.,Nelson, M. (2004). How teachers' professional identities position high stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1288-1331.
29. Meier, D. (2003). In schools we trust. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
30. Davis, B.,Phelps, R. (2005). Exploring the common spaces of education and complexity: Transphenomenality, transdisciplinarity, and interdiscursivity. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1), 1-4.
31. Guthrie, J. T. (2002). Preparing students for high stakes test taking in reading, In A. Farstrup, S. Samuels,S. Jay (Eds.). What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed.). New York, DE: International Reading Association.
32. Northwest Regional Education Laboratory (2001). Advocating for culturally congruent school reform. http://www.nwrac.org/congruent/index.html
33. Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Gere, A., Christenbury, L.,Sassi, K. (2004). Writing on-demand: Best practices and strategies for success. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
35. Barnes, D., Britton, J.,Rosen, H. (1969). Language, the learner, and the school. New York: Penguin.
36. Gere, A., Christenbury, L.,Sassi, K. (2005). On-demand writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
37. Calkins, L., Montgomery, K., Falk, B.,Santman, D. (1998). A teacher's guide to standardized reading tests: Knowledge is power. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38. Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
39. Oakland Schools. MEAPwriting-Genre study for MEAP Preparation. www.oakland.k12.mi.us/meapwriting
40. Hart, B.,Risley, T. (Spring, 2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age three. American Educator. http://www.aft.org/pubsreports/ american_educator/spring2003/catastrophe.html
41. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.