Finding frames in a web of culture: The case of the war on terror

Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 17-42

  Reese, Stephen D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917360614     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203864463     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Armstrong, D. (2002, October). Dick Cheney's song of America: Drafting a plan of global dominance. Harper's, 305, 76-83.
2. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
3. Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R., & Livingston, S. (2006). None dare call it torture:Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467-485.
4. Bush, G. W. (2003, May 2). Bush: "Enemies of freedom are not idle, and neither are we." USA Today, p. A2.
5. Bush, G. W. (2004a, April 14). President Bush's opening statement on Iraq. New York Times, p. A11.
6. Bush, G. W. (2004b, November 2). Why you should vote for me today. USA Today, p. A17.
7. Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214-233.
9. Christie, T. B. (2006). Framing rationale for the Iraq War: The interaction of public support with mass media and public policy agendas. International Communication Gazette, 68(5-6), 519-532.
10. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870-888.
11. Deats, R. (2002, February 1). Bush "doctrine" too narrow. USA Today, p. A11.
12. Di Rita, L. (2005, August 5). Don't tie our hands: Congress shouldn't set limits on interrogating captured terrorists. USA Today, p. A12.
13. Dorell, O. (2005, May 5). Bush visit puts focus on concerns over Russia's path. USA Today, p. A5.
14. Dorell, O., Drinkard, J., Kiely, K., Kirchhoff, S., & Ko, S. (2006, February 1). The key points and their context: The State of the Union. USA Today, p. A7.
15. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
16. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432.
17. Entman, R. M., & Rojecki, A. (1993). Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Political communication, 10(2), 151-167.
18. Gamson, W. A. (2001). Foreword. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. ix-xi). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
20. Gannon, J. P. (2005, November 3). How Bush can right the ship. USA Today, p. A15.
21. Gordon, M. R., & Trainor, B. E. (2006). Cobra II: The inside story of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. New York: Pantheon Books.
22. Grossman, C. L. (2003, February 3). President draws on the Bible to comfort a grieving nation. USA Today, p. A5.
23. Hackett, R. (1984). Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(3), 229-259.
24. Hall, M. (2004, August 5). Questions about terror threat answered. USA Today, p. A10.
25. Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 139-161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Hess, S., & Kalb, M. L. (Eds.). (2003). The media and the war on terrorism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27. Ignatieff, M. (2004, May 2). Lesser evils: What it will cost us to succeed in the war on terror. New York Times Magazine, 46-51, 86, 94.
28. Isikoff, M., & Corn, D. (2006). Hubris: The inside story of spin, scandal, and the selling of the Iraq War. New York: Crown.
29. Keen, J. (2002a, August 1). Bush won't be all play and no work USA Today, p. A4.
30. Keen, J. (2002b, November 4). President's all-out campaigning for GOP a gamble. USA Today, p. A10.
31. Keen, J. (2002c, February 1). Stern Bush repeats warning to "axis." USA Today, p. A6.
32. Keen, J. (2004, August 2). Talk on terrorism draws cheers; Tough stance revs up crowds. USA Today, p. A5.
33. Kelly, M. (2004, May 15). Rove lauds Ill. GOP for voter registration. The Baltimore Sun, p. A2.
34. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago:University of Chicago.
35. Lakoff, G. (2006). "War on terror," rest in peace. Retrieved from http://www. rockridgeinstitute.org/research/lakoff/gwot_rip
36. Lawrence, J. (2004, August 3). Kerry criticizes Bush's pace in war on terrorism. USA Today, p. A2.
37. Lewis, S., & Reese, S. D. (2009). What is the War on Terror? Exploring framing through the eyes of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 85-102.
38. Luce, E. (2006, March 11). How Republicans and Democrats alike are out-Bushing Bush. The Financial Times, p. 11.
39. Lule, J. (2001). Daily news, eternal stories: The mythological role of journalism. New York: Guilford Press.
40. McQuillan, L., & Benedetto, R. (2003, May 2). Bush hails win, looks ahead. USA Today, p. A1.
41. Nacos, B. L. (2002). Mass-mediated terrorism: The central role of the media in terrorism and counterterrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
42. Nelson, T., & Willey, E. (2001). Issue frames that strike a value balance: A political psychology perspective. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 245-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Norris, P., Kern, M., & Just, M. R. (2003). Framing terrorism. In P. Norris, M. Kern & M. R. Just (Eds.), Framing terrorism: The news media, the government, and the public (pp. 3-23). New York: Routledge.
44. Page, S. (2002a, August 7). Corporate credentials weigh down Bush's team. USA Today, p. B1.
45. Page, S. (2002b, May 3). The new new economy. USA Today, p. A4.
46. Page, S. (2004, November 1). Swing states lean to Kerry; Democrat ties Bush nationally. USA Today, p. A1.
47. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75.
48. Pancake, A. S. (1993). Taken by storm: The exploitation of metaphor in the Persian Gulf War. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 8, 281-295.
49. Record, J. (2003). Bounding the global war on terrorism. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
50. Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Reese, S. D. (2002, December 16). Framing our country's war against terrorism. Austin American-Statesman, p. A13.
52. Reese, S. D. (2004). Militarized journalism: Framing dissent in the Persian Gulf wars. In S. Allan & B. Zelizer (Eds.), Reporting war: Journalism in wartime (pp. 247-265). New York: Routledge.
53. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148-154.
54. Reese, S. D. (2008). Media production and content. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (pp. 2982-2994). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
55. Reese, S. D., & Buckalew, B. (1995). The militarism of local television: The routine framing of the Persian Gulf War. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12(1), 40-59.
56. Reese, S. D., & Lewis, S. (2009). Framing the War on Terror: Internalization of policy by the U.S. press. Journalism: Theory, Practice, Criticism, 10(6).
57. Ricks, T. E. (2006). Fiasco: The American military adventure in Iraq. New York: Penguin Press.
58. Rojecki, A. (2005). Media discourse on globalization and terror. Political Communication, 22(1), 63-81.
59. Sanger, D. E. (2005, September 22). Bush compares responses to hurricane and terrorism. New York Times, p. A24.
60. Schmitt, E., & Shanker, T. (2005, July 25). New name for "war on terror" reflects wider U.S. campaign. New York Times, p. A7.
61. Shapiro, W. (2002, November 1). Democrats may have edge, but it won't be a sharp one. USA Today, p. A14.
62. Smith, P. (2005). Why war? The cultural logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
64. Spielvogel, C. (2005). "You know where I stand": Moral framing of the war on terrorism and the Iraq War in the 2004 presidential campaign. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 8(4), 549-569.
65. Stevenson, R. W. (2004, March 20). President, marking anniversary of war, urges world to unite to combat terrorism. New York Times, p. A7.
66. Stevenson, R. W. (2005, August 4). President makes it clear: Phrase is "war on terror." New York Times, p. A12.
67. Suskind, R. (2006). The one percent doctrine: Deep inside America's pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.
68. Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
70. USA Today. (2001, November 5). [Editorial] Defense plan doesn't adapt to new face of war. USA Today, p. A14.
71. USA Today. (2004a, November 1). [Editorial] Bin Laden's message. USA Today, p. A20.
72. USA Today. (2004b, November 4). [News Analysis] GOP challenge: Small wins or enduring dominance. USA Today, p. A26.
73. The White House. (2003). National strategy for combating terrorism. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
74. The White House. (2006). National security strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
75. Wickham, D. (2003, May 6). Democratic herd needs culling. USA Today, p. A15.
76. Wilgoren, J., & Nagourney, A. (2003, April 8). While mourning dead, many Americans say level of casualties is acceptable. New York Times, p. B1.
77. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.