Educating drug-exposed children: The aftermath of the crack baby crisis

Educating Drug-Exposed Children: The Aftermath of the Crack-Baby Crisis

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-151

  Thomas, Janet Y ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917321250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203998021     Document Type: Book

References (230)

1. Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lindgard, B., and Henry, M., Educational policy and the politics of change (London: Routledge, 1997).
2. Young,M. D.,Multifocal educational policy research: Toward a method for enhancing traditional policy studies, American Educational Research Journal, 36 (1999), 677-714;
3. Scheurich, J. J., Policy archeology: A new policy studies mythology, Journal of Education Policy, 9 (1994), 297-316;
4. Ball, S., Education reform: A critical and poststructural approach (Buckingham, England: Open University Press, 1994.
5. Dunbar, C. (2001). Does anyone know were here: Alternative schooling for African American youth.New York: Peter Lang.
6. Pillow,W. S. (1997). Decentering silences/troubling irony: Teen pregnancy's challenge to policy analysis. In C.Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 134-152). London: Falmer Press.
7. Kusserow, R. P., Crack babies, Report of the Office of the Inspector General (Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1990).
8. Fraser, N., Unruly practices: Power discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
9. Reeves, J. L., and Campbell, R., Crack coverage: Television, news, the anti-drug crusade and the Reagan legacy (Durham: Duke University Press, 1994).
10. Reeves and Campbell, Crack coverage, 208.
11. Washington Post, December 5, 1989,August 6, 1989;
12. New York Times,May 7, 1989.
13. Reeves and Campbell, Crack coverage, 209.
14. Solinger, R., Wake up little Susie: Single pregnancy and race before Roe v. Wade (New York: Routledge, 2000).
15. Solinger,Wake up little Susie, 24;
16. Richmond News Leader, March 22, 1957, cited in Solinger.
17. Reeves and Campbell, Crack coverage, 210.
18. Chasnoff, I. J., Landress, H. J., and Barrett, M., The prevalence of illegal drug or alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida, New England Journal ofMedicine, 322 (1990), 1202-6;
19. Mathias, R.,Women and drug abuse:NIDA survey provides first national data on drug use during pregnancy, NIDA Notes, 1 (1995), 1.
20. Besharov,D., Crack children in foster care, Children Today, 19 (1990), 21-25.
21. Katz, M., The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare (New York:Pantheon Books, 1989).
22. Joffe, C.,Welfare reform and reproductive politics on a collision course: Contradictions in the conservative agenda. In Lo, C. Y. H., and Schwartz, M. (eds.), Social policy and the conservative agenda, 290-301 (Malden,Mass.: Blackwell, 1998).
23. Murray, C., Losing ground: American social policy, 1950-1980 (New York: Basic Books, 1984).
24. Greenstein, R. (1988). Holes in Safety Net Programs and Policies in the States.Washington, D.C.: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
25. Weicher, J., Entitlement issues in the domestic budget: The long-term agenda (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1985).
26. Humphries, D., Crack mothers: Pregnancy, drugs, and the media (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999).
27. Scott, G.,High Cost of Crack Babies,News Monitor, November 1991, 1.
28. Christian Science Monitor, February 15, 1989;
29. New York Times, May 10 and August 7, 1989;
30. Time,May 13, 1991.
31. Reeves and Campbell, Crack coverage.
32. Roberts,D.,Unshackling Black motherhood,Michigan Law Review, 95 (1997), 938-64.
33. Paltrow, L., Defending the rights of pregnant addicts, Champion, August 1993, 18-19.
34. Paltrow, L. M., Cohen, D. S., and Carey, C. A., Governmental responses to pregnant women who use alcohol or other drugs (Washington,D.C.:Women's Law Project, 2000).
35. Moss, K. L., Paltrow, L., and Crockett, J.,Women's rights project (Washington, D.C.: American Civil Liberties Union, 1990).
36. Chavkin, W., Help Don't Jail Addicted Mothers, New York Times, August, 1989, p. A-21;
37. Chavkin,W., Testimony before the House Select Committee on Children, Youth and Families, U.S.House of Representatives, April, 27, 1989.
38. Kusserow, R. P., Crack babies, Report of the Office of the Inspector General (Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1990).
39. Jones, R. L.,McCollough, C., and Dewoody, M. The child welfare challenge in meeting developmental needs, in Identifying the needs of drug-affected children: Public policy issues, 109-29 (Washington,D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992).
40. Feig, L., Understanding the problem: The gap between substance abuse programs and child welfare services, in Hampton,R. L., Senatore,V., and Gullotta,T.P. (eds.), Substance abuse, family violence, and child welfare: Bridging perspectives, 62-95 (London: Sage Publications, 1998).
41. Gregorie,T. K.,Assessing the benefits and increasing the utility of addiction training for child welfare workers: A pilot study, Child Welfare, 73, 1 (1994), 69-81;
42. Tracey, E. M.,Maternal substance abuse: Protecting the child, preserving the family, Social Work, 39, 5 (1994), 534-40.
43. Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, In the courts: Ferguson v. City of Charleston, available at http://www.crlp.org/crtpregferguson.html.
44. Amnesty International, Not part of my sentence: Violations of the human rights of women in custody (Washington, D.C.: Amnesty International, 1999), 26;
45. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform crime reports 1985 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1986), 181
46. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform crime reports 1997 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1998), 231
47. National Advocates for Pregnant Women, http://advocatesforpregnantwomen.org.
48. Greenfield, L. A., and Snell, T. L., Bureau of Justice statistics, women offenders (Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice, 1999), 5
49. National Advocates for Pregnant Women, http://advocatesforpregnantwomen.org.
50. Irwin, J., Schiraldi,V., and Ziedenberg, J., America's one million nonviolent prisoners (Washington, D.C.: Justice Policy Institute, 1999), 6-7;
51. National Advocates for Pregnant Women, http://advocatesforpregnantwomen.org.
52. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse Services at Columbia University, Substance abuse and women on welfare (New York: National Center, 1996);
53. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Patterns of substance use and substance-related impairments among participants in Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC) (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1994).
54. Allard, P., Life sentences: Denying welfare benefits to women convicted of drug-related offenses (Washington,D.C.: The Sentencing Project, 2002).
55. Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services, The Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System-Data for the Period Ending March 31, 1999 (Washington,D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2000).
56. Vivian D. Brown, Interview with Maggie Wilmore, Chief of Women and Children's Branch, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 1995, 27 (4) 321-323;
57. SAMHSA Funding for Women-Specific Programs. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1995.
58. Mechanic, D., Schlesinger, M., and McAlpine, D. D., Management of mental health and substance abuse services: State of the art and early results, The Milbank Quarterly, 73 (1995), 19-55.
59. Galanter, M., Keller, D. S., Dermatis, H., and Egelko, S. The impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment: A report of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, Journal of Addictive Diseases, 19, 3 (2000), 27.
60. Grumbach, K., Osmond, D., Vranizan, K., Jaffe, D., and Bindman, A.B. Primary care physicians' experience of financial incentives in managed care systems, New England Journal of Medicine, 339 (21) (1998), 1516-21.
61. State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Drug abuse hospitalization cost study, 1999, available online at http://www.fdhc.state.fl.us/index.shtml.
62. Dace, S., et. al., Cost-effectiveness for drug-abusing pregnant women,Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 45 (1997), 105-13.
63. Scully, J. M. (2000). Cracking Open CRACK: Unethical Sterilization Movement Gains Momentum. National Coalition Against CRACK; The National Coalition Against C.R.A.C.K., The CRACK program: Discriminatory, unethical, ineffective and bad public policy, http://www.cwpe.org/issues/health_html/contraceptives/crack/cac_factsheet.html.
64. Scully, J.M. (2000). Cracking Open CRACK.
65. Belenko, S. R., Crack and the evolution of the anti-drug policy (London: Greenwood Press, 1993).
66. Rydell, C. P., and Everingham, S. S., Controlling cocaine, report prepared for the Office of National Drug Control Policy and the United States Army (Santa Monica: Drug Policy Research Center, Rand Corporation, 1994).
67. Trost, C., As drug babies grow older, schools strive to meet their needs,Wall Street Journal, December 29, 1989, A1-A2.
68. Elliott, K. T., and Coker, D. R., Crack babies: Here they come, ready or not, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 18 (1991), 60-64;
69. Rist, M. C.,"Crack babies" in school, Education Digest, 55 (1990), 30-33;
70. Chira, S., Crack babies turn 5 and schools brace, New York Times, May 5, 1990;
71. Highley, S., "Crack babies" in the classroom, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 18 (1991), 208-10.
72. Greer, J. V., The drug babies, Exceptional Children, 56 (1990), 382-84.
73. Poulsen, L. V., Cole, C.,Woodruff, G., and Griffith, D., Born substance exposed, educationally vulnerable (Reston, Va.: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1991);
74. Rist, M. C., The shadow children, American School Board Journal, 177, 1 (1990), 18-24.
75. Laderman, D. A., Crack babies: Ready or not, here they come. American Teacher, 75, 930 (1990), 9-16.
76. Frank, D. A., Augustyn, M., Grant, W., Knight, W. G., Tripler, P., and Zuckerman, B., Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure, Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 12 (2001), 1-33.
77. Acker, D., Sachs, B. P., Tracey, K. J., and Wise,W. E., Abruptio placentae associated with cocaine use, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2 (1983), 220-21;
78. Baxter, A., Butler, L. S., Brinkler, R. P., Frazier,W. A., and Wedgeworth, D. M., Effective early intervention for children prenatally exposed to cocaine in an inner-city context, in Lewis, M., and Bendersky, M. (eds.), Mothers, babies, and cocaine: The role of toxins in development, 335-53 (Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1995).
79. Chasnoff, I. J., Burns,W. J., Schnoll, S. H., and Burns, K. A., Cocaine use in pregnancy, New England Journal of Medicine, 331 (1985), 666-69.
80. Bauchner, H., Zuckerman, B.,McCain, M., Frank,D., Fried, L. E., and Kane, H., Risk of sudden infant death syndrome among infants with in utero exposure to cocaine, Journal of Pediatrics, 113 (1988), 831-34;
81. Chasnoff, I. J., Bussy, M. E., Savich, R., and Stack, C. M., Perinatal cerebral infarction and maternal cocaine use, Journal of Pediatrics, 108 (1986), 456-59;
82. Chasnoff, I. J., Lewis, D. E., Griffith, D. R., and Willey, S., Cocaine and pregnancy:Clinical and toxicological implications for neonate, Clinical Chemistry, 35, 7 (1989), 1276-8;
83. Chasnoff, I. J., Cocaine, pregnancy and the neonate, Women's Health, 15 (1989), 23-25;
84. Chasnoff, I. J., and Griffith, D. R., Cocaine: Clinical studies of pregnancy and the newborn, Annuals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 562 (1989), 260-66;
85. Chasnoff, I. J., Hunt, C. E., Kletter, R., and Kaplan, D., Prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with respiratory pattern abnormalities, American Journal of Diseases of Children, 143 (1989), 583-587;
86. Dixon, S. S., Coen, R.W., and Crutchfield,W., Visual dysfunction in cocaine exposed infants, Pediatric Research, 21 (1987), 359A;
87. Fulroth, R., Phillips, B., and Durand, D., Perinatal outcome of infants exposed to cocaine and/or heroin in utero, American Journal of Diseases of Children, 43 (1989), 905-10;
88. Kelley, S. J., Walsh, J. H., and Thompson, K. (1991), Birth outcomes, health problems, and neglect with prenatal cocaine exposure to cocaine, Pediatric Nurse, 17 (1989), 130-36;
89. Little, B. B., Snell, L. M., Klein,V. R., and Gilstrap, L. C. III, Cocaine abuse during pregnancy: maternal and fetal implications, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 73 (1989), 157-60;
90. Madden, J. D., Payne, T. F., and Miller, S.,Maternal cocaine abuse and effect on the newborn, Pediatrics 77 (1986), 209-11;
91. MacGregor, S. N., Keith, L. G., Chasnoff, I. J., Rosner, M. A., Chisum, G. M., Shaw, P., and Minogue, J. P., Cocaine use during pregnancy: Adverse perinatal outcome, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 157 (1987), 686-90;
92. Oro, A. S., and Dixon, S. D., Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure:Maternal and neonatal correlates, Journal of Pediatrics, 111 (1987), 571-79;
93. Riley, J. G., and Porat, R., Abnormal pneumograms in infants with in utero cocaine exposure, Pediatric Research, 21 (1987), 262A;
94. Wilson, G. S., Clinical studies of infants and children exposed prenatally to heroin, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 562 (1989), 183-94;
95. Zuckerman, B., Frank, D. A., Hingson, R., Amaro, H., Levenson, S. M., Kayne, H., Parker, S.,Vinci, R., Aboagye, K., Fried, L. E., et al., Effects of marijuana and cocaine use on fetal growth, New England Journal of Medicine, 320 (1989), 762-68.
96. Goodman, E., The myth of the "crack babies,"Boston Globe, January 12, 1992, 69;
97. Besharov,D. J., Crack babies: The worst threat is mom herself, Washington Post, August 6, 1989.
98. Tanner, L.,Worries about "crack babies" are exaggerated, Chicago Sun-Times,March 28, 2001.
99. Mayes, L. C.,Granger, R. H., Bornstein, M. H., and Zuckerman, B., The problem of prenatal cocaine exposure: A rush to judgment, Journal of the American Medical Association, 267 (1992), 406-8.
100. Inciardi, J. A., Lockwood, D., and Pottieger, A. E., Women and crack cocaine (New York:Macmillan, 1993);
101. Murphy, S., and Rosenbaum, M., Pregnant women on drugs: Combating stereotypes and stigma (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1999);
102. Humphries, D., Crack mothers: Pregnancy, drugs and the media (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999).
103. Chasnoff, I. J., Griffith, D. R., Freier, C., and Murry, J., Cocaine/polydrug use in pregnancy:Two-year follow-up, Pediatrics, 89 (1992), 284-89;
104. Griffith, D. R., Azuma, S. D., and Chasnoff, I. J., Three-year outcome of children exposed prenatally to drugs, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 1 (1994), 20-34;
105. Hurt, H., Brodsky, N. L., Betancourt, L., Braitman, L. E.,Malmud, E., and Gianetta, J., Cocaine exposed children:Follow-up through 30 months, Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 16 (1995), 29-35;
106. Hurt, H., Brodsky, N. L., Braitman, L. E., and Gianetta, J., Natal status of infants of cocaine users and control subjects: A prospective comparison, Journal of Perinatology, 15, 4 (1995), 297-304;
107. Hurt, H., A prospective evaluation of early language development in children with in utero cocaine exposure and in control subjects, Journal of Pediatrics, 130 (1997), 310-12;
108. Lutiger, B., Graham, K., Einarson, T. R., and Koren, G., Relationship between gestational cocaine use and pregnancy outcome, Teratology, 44 (1991), 405-14;
109. McCalla, S.,Minkoff, H. L., and Feldman, J., The biologic and social consequences of perinatal cocaine use in an inner-city population. Results of an anonymous cross-sectional study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 164 (1991), 625-30;
110. Griffith,D.,Azuma, S.D., and Chasnoff, I. J., Three-year outcome of children prenatally exposed to drugs, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 1 (1994), 20-27.
111. Hurt et al., (1995). Cocaine exposed children. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development measure mental, physical, social, and emotional development. The Bayley Scales are often used to determine whether a child is developing normally and to provide an early diagnosis for intervention in the case of developmental delay.
112. Napiorkowski, B., Lester, B. M., Freier,M. C., Brunner, S., Dietz, L.,Nadra, A., and Oh,W., Effects of in utero substance exposure on infant neurobehavior, Pediatrics 98, 1 (1996), 71-75.
113. Arendt, R.,Angelopoulos, J., Salvator, A., and Singer, L.,Motor development of cocaine-exposed children at age two years, Pediatrics, 103 (1999), 86-92.
114. Richardson, G. A., Hamel, S. C., Goldschmidt, L., and Day, N. L., Growth of infants prenatally exposed to cocaine/crack: Comparison of a prenatal care and a no prenatal care sample, Pediatrics, 104, 2 (1999), 1e18.
115. Richardson, G. A., Prenatal cocaine exposure: A longitudinal study of development, in Harvey, J. A., and Kosofsky, B. E. (eds.), Cocaine: Effects on the developing brain, 144-52:e18 (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1998).
116. Mayes, L. C.,Grillon, C.,Granger, R., and Schottenfeld, R., Regulation of arousal and attention in preschool children exposed prenatally to cocaine, in Harvey, J. A., and Kosofsky, B. E. (eds.), Cocaine: Effects on the developing brain, 126-43 (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1998).
117. Chasnoff, I. J.,Anson, A.,Hatcher, R., Stenson, H., Iaukea, K., and Randolph, L. A.,Prenatal exposure to cocaine and other drugs: Outcome at 4 to 6 years, in Harvey, J. A., and Kosofsky,B. E. (eds.), Cocaine: Effects on the developing brain, 314-28 (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1998).
118. Chasnoff, I. J.,Anson, A. R., and Iaukea, K. A.,Understanding the drugexposed child: Approaches to behavior and learning (Chicago: Imprint Publications, 1998).
119. Lu, N. T., Taylor, B. G., and Riley, K. J., The validity of adult arrestee self-reports of crack cocaine use, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 3 (2001), 399-419.
120. Day, N. L., and Robles, N., Methodological issues in the measurement of substance abuse, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 562 (1989), 8-13.
121. Howard, J., and Beckwith, L., Issues in subject recruitment and retention with pregnant and parent substance-abusing women, in Rahdert, E. (ed.), Treatment for drug-exposed women and their children: Advances in research methodology, 69-85 (Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996).
122. Ostrea, E. M., Brady, M., Gausse, S., Raymundo, A. L., and Stevens, M., Drug screening of newborns by meconium analysis. A large scale prospective, epidemiologic study, Pediatrics, 111 (1992), 571-78;
123. Ostrea, E. M., Lizardo, E., and Tanafranca, M., The prevalence of illicit drug exposure in the NICU as determined by meconium drug screen, Pediatric Research, 31 (1992), 215A.
124. Frank,D. A., Zuckerman, B. S.,Amaro, H.,Aboague, K., Bauchner, H., Cabral, H., et al., Cocaine use during pregnancy: Prevalence and correlates, Pediatrics, 82 (1988), 888-95;
125. Matera, C.,Warren,W. B.,Moomjy, M., Fink,D. J., and Fox, H. E., Prevalence of cocaine use and other substances in an obstetric population, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 163 (1990), 797-801;
126. Garcia, D. C., Romero, A., Garcia, G. C., and Ostrea, E. M., Gastric fluid analysis for determining gestational cocaine exposure, Pediatrics, 98 (1996), 291-93.
127. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, Adoption and prenatal alcohol and drug exposure:Implications for adoption practice, 1997, available at http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/proed/pserjw10.html.
128. Singer, L. T., Arendt, R.,Minnes, S., Farkas, K., Salvator, A., Kirchner, H. L., and Kliegman, R., Cognitive and motor outcomes of cocaine exposed infants, Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (2002), 1-19.
129. Halstead, A. C., Godolphin,W., Lickitch, G., and Segal, S., Timing of specimen collection is crucial in urine screening of drug-dependent mothers and newborns, Clinical Biochemistry, 21 (1988), 59-61;
130. Lester, B. M., Freier, K., and LaGasse, L. L., Prenatal cocaine exposure and child outcome:What do we really know? in Lewis, M., and Bendersky, M. (eds.), Mothers, babies, and cocaine: The role of toxins in development, 19-39 (Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995).
131. Kwong, T. C., and Ryan, R. M., Detection of intrauterine illicit drug exposure by newborn drug testing, Clinical Chemistry, 43 (1997), 235-42.
132. Halstead, A. C., Godolphin,W., Lockitch, G., and Segal, S., Timing of specimen is crucial in urine of drug dependent mothers and infants, Clinical Biochemistry, 21 (1988), 59-61.
133. Ostrea, E. M., Meconium drug analysis, Mectest Corporation Document 5889, Rowland Heights, Calif., 1996.
134. Ostrea, E. M. and others (1988). Rapid isolation and deletion of drugs in meconium of infants of dependent mothers;
135. Ostrea, E. M. (1996).Meconium drug analysis.
136. Ostrea, E. M., Brady, M. J., Parks, P. M., Asensio, D. C., and Naluz, A., Drug screening of meconium in infants of drug dependent mothers: An alternative to urine testing, Journal of Pediatrics, 115 (1989), 474-77;
137. Maynard, E. C., Amuroso, L. P., and Oh,W.,Meconium for drug testing, American Journal of Diseases of Children, 145 (1991), 650-52;
138. Callahan, C. M., Grant, T. M., Phillips, P., Clark, G., et al., Measurement for gestational cocaine exposure:Sensitivity of newborn: hair, meconium and urine, Journal of Pediatrics, 120 (1992), 763-68;
139. Ostrea, E. M., Brady, M., Gausse, S., et al., Drug screening of newborns by meconium analysis: A large scale, prospective, epidemiological study, Pediatrics, 89 (1992), 107;
140. Bandstra, E. S., Stele, B.W., Chitwood, D. D., et al., Detection of in utero cocaine exposure:a comparative methodologic study, Pediatric Research, 31 (1992), 58A.
141. Sinclair, E., Head Start children at risk: Relationship of prenatal drug use, identification of special needs and subsequent special education placement, Journal of Behavioral Disorders, 23, 2 (1998), 125-33.
142. Delaney-Black, V., Covington, C., Templin, T., Ager, J., Martier, S., and Sokol, R., Prenatal cocaine exposure and child behavior, Pediatrics, 102, 4 (1998), 945-50.
143. Delaney-Black,V.,Covington, C., Templin, T.,Ager, J.,Nordstorm-Klee, B.,Martier, S., Leddick, L., Czerwinski, R. H., and Skokol, R. J., Teacher assessed behavior of children prenatally exposed to cocaine, Pediatrics, 106, 4 (2000), 782-91.
144. Waller, M. B., Crack babies grown up, American School Board Journal, 181 (1994), 30-31.
145. Lester, B. M., LaGasse, L. L., and Seifer, R., Cocaine exposure and children: The meaning of subtle effects, Science, 282 (1998), 633-34.
146. Schipper,W., Drug-exposed children in the schools: Problems and policy, Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control (Washington,D.S.: Government Printing Office, 1991).
147. Stayton, TK, and Karnes, TK, Model programs for infants and toddlers, in Johnson, L. J., Gallagher, R. J., LaMontagne, M. J., Jordan, J. B., Gallagher, J. J., Huntinger, P. L., and Karnes, M. B. (eds.), Meeting Early Intervention Challenges: Issues from Birth to Three, 34 (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1994).
148. Gallagher, J. J., Harbin, G., Eckland, J., and Clifford, R., State diversity and policy implementation: Infants and toddlers, in the same volume.
149. Schipper,W., (1991). Drug-exposed children in the schools.
150. Danaher, J., Part C updates (Chapel Hill: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center,University of North Carolina, 2002), 36.
151. Danaher, Part C updates, 36.
152. Harbin, G. L., and Maxwell, K., Progress toward developing a definition for developmentally delayed: Report #2 (Chapel Hill: Carolina Policy Studies Program, University of North Carolina, 1991);
153. Harbin, G. L., and Terry, D., Definition of developmentally delayed and at-risk infants and toddlers (Chapel Hill: Carolina Policy Studies Program, University of North Carolina, 1990)
154. Harbin, G. L., Gallagher, J. J., and Terry,D.V.,Defining the eligible population: Policy issues and challenges, Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 1 (1990), 13-20.
155. Quinton, S. L., Johnson, S. A., Johnson, E. M., Denniston, R. W., and Auguston, K. L. (eds.), Identifying the needs of drug-affected children: Public policy issues, OSAP Prevention Monograph 11, publication 3 ADM 92-1814, 133-38 (Rockville, Md.: Office for Substance Abuse Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992).
156. Smith, TK, and McKenna, TK, Early intervention and public policy, in Johnson, L. J., Gallagher, R. J., LaMontagne, M. J., Jordan, J. B., Gallagher, J. J.,Huntinger, P. L., and Karnes, M. B. (eds.),Meeting early intervention challenges, 251-64 (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1994).
157. Trohanis, P. L., Progress in providing services to young children with special needs and their families: An overview to and updates on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), NECTAC Notes no. 12 (Chapel Hill: FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2002), 2.
158. Special ed. services in Ill. fall short, judge rules, Education Week, February 14, 1996;
159. Judge:Illinois "dragging its feet" on part H services, The Special Educator, 11, 15 (1996).
160. McNeil, J., Americans with disabilities, 1991-1992: Data from the survey of income and program participation, Current Population Reports, 70-73 (Washington,D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1993)
161. Bowe, F. G., Population estimates:Birth to 5 children with disabilities, Journal of Special Education, 28, 4 (1995), 461-71.
162. Danaher, J., Eligibility policies and practices for young children under Part B of the IDEA, NECTAC Notes no. 9 (Chapel Hill: FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2001).
163. Humphries, D., Crack mothers: Pregnancy, drugs and the media (Columbus:Ohio State University Press, 1999).
164. Danaher, J., Eligibility policies and practices, 2.
165. Trohanis, Progress in providing services, 2.
166. Humphries, Crack mothers. 1999.
167. Chasnoff, I. J.,Hope for a lost generation, School Safety, winter 1992, 4-6.
168. Brady, J. P., Posner, M., Lang, C., and Rosati, M. J., Risk and reality: The implications of prenatal exposure to alcohol and other drugs (n.p.: The Education Development Center, 1994);
169. Sautter, C. R., Crack: Healing the children, Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (1992), K1-K12;
170. Powell, D., Elemplary programs serving young children prenatally exposed to drugs (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1991);
171. Poulsen, M., Schools meet the challenge: Educational needs of children at risk due to substance abuse, Resources in Special Education (Sacramento, Calif.: Children's Resource Institute, 1992);
172. Cole, C., Ferrara,V., Johnson, D., Jones, M., Schoenbaum, M., Tyler, R., Wallace, V., and Poulsen, M., Today's challenge: Teaching strategies for working with young children prenatally exposed to drugs/alcohol (Los Angeles CA: Los Angeles Unified School District, 1991).
173. Davis, E., Testimony on Drug-Exposed Children.Hearing Before the Select Committee on Narcotic Abuse and Control (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1991);
174. Sautter, Crack: Healing the children; Administration for Children and Families, Head Start Family Service Center Demonstration Projects (1994), 1-5.
175. Hime, G., Council for Exceptional Children, Testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources concerning the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, January 29, 1997.Washington,D.C.: Government Printing Office.
176. Parrish, T., Disparities in the identification, funding, and provision of special education, submitted to the Civil Rights Project for the Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education in Public Schools (Washington,D.C.: American Institutes for Research, 2000).
177. Chapman, J. K., and Elliott, R. N., Preschoolers exposed to cocaine: Early childhood special education and head start preparation, Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 2 (1995), 118-29;
178. Kim, Y. M., Sugai, G. M., and Kim, G., Early intervention needs of children at risk due to prenatal drug exposure: A survey of early childhood educators, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 2 (1999), 207-15.
179. Hime, Testimony, 6-7.
180. Brotherson, M. J., Sheriff, G., Milburn, P., and Schertz, M., Elementary school principals and their needs and issues for inclusive early childhood education programs, Topics in Early Childhood Education, 21, 1 (2001), 31-45.
181. Senate defeats special education funding measure, http://fyi.cnn.com/2001/fyi/teachers.ednews/05/18/special.education.ap/.
182. http://democrats.senate.gov/~dpc/pubs/107-2-20.html.
183. Jacobson, L., and Bowman, D. H., Early-childhood-education advocates say president's budget fails to meet his rhetoric, Education Week on the Web, http://www.edweek.org/ew/newstory.cfm?slug=22budside1.h21.
184. Whorton, J. E., Siders, J. A., Fowler, R. E., and Naylor, D. L., A two decade review of the number of students with disabilities receiving federal monies and the types of educational placements used, Education, 121, 2 (2000), 287-97.
185. Clandinin, D. J., and Connelly, F. M., Teacher professional knowledge landscapes (New York:Teachers College Press, 1995);
186. Foster, M., Black teachers on teaching (New York: New Press, 1999);
187. Lasdon-Billings, G., The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994).
188. Connelly, F. M., and Clandinin, D. J., Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice (New York: Teachers College Press, 1999).
189. Gitlin, A., and Russell, R., Alternative methodologies in the research context, in Gitlin, A. (ed)., Power and Method, 181-202 (London: Routledge, 1994).
190. Patton, M. Q., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edition (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1990), 230.
191. Smart Steps: Treating Baltimore's Drug Problem. http://www.drugstrategies.org/Baltimore/BltChl.html).
192. Shand. S. "Overdose deaths exceed slayings." Baltimore Sun, (9/15/00).
193. Humphries, D., Crack mothers: Pregnancy, drugs, and the media (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999), 144.
194. Merriam, S. B., Qualitative research and case study applications in education (San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 1998).
195. Soby, J. M., Prenatal exposure to drugs/alcohol: Characteristics and educational implications of fetal alcohol syndrome and cocaine/polydrug effects (Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1994).
196. Essen, J., Lambert, L., and Head, J., School attainment of children who have been in care, Child Care,Health and Development, 2 (1976), 339-51;
197. Fanshel,D., and Shinn, E. B., Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978);
198. Heath, A., Colton, M., and Aldgate, J., Educational progress of children in and out of care, British Journal of Social Work, 19, 6 (1989);
199. Jackson, S., Educating children in residential foster care, Oxford Review of Education 20, 3 (1994), 267-80;
200. Newton, R. R., Litrownik, A. J., and Landsverk, J. A., Children and youth in foster care: Detangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements, Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 10 (2000), 1363-74.
201. Allington, R. L., and McGill-Franzen, A., School response to reading failure: Instructions for chapter one and special education students grade two, four, and eight, Elementary School Journal, 89 (1989), 529-42.
202. Hehir, T., Eliminating ableism in education, Harvard Educational Review, 72, 1 (2002), 1-32.
203. Hettleman, K. R., Still getting it wrong: The continuing failure of special education in Baltimore city public schools (Baltimore: Abell Foundation, 2002).
204. Forsyth, B., Leventhal, J., Qi, K., Johnson, L., Schroeder, D., and Votto, N., Health care and hospitalization of young children born to cocaine-using women, Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152, 2 (1998), 177-84.
205. Chavkin,W., and Breitbart, V., Substance abuse and maternity: The United States as a case study, Addiction, 92, 9 (1997), 1201-5.
206. Zellman, G. L., Jacobson, P. D., and Bell, R. M., Influencing physicians response to prenatal substance exposure through state legislation and work place practices, Addiction, 92 (1997), 1123-31.
207. Chavkin,W., Breitbart,V., Elman, D. and Wise, P. H., National survey of the States: Policies and practices regarding drug-using pregnant women, American Journal of Public Health, 88 (1998), 117-19;
208. Chavkin,W.,Wise, P. H., and Elman,D., Policies toward pregnancy and addiction:Sticks without carrots, in Harvey, J. A., and Kosofsky, B. E. (eds.), Cocaine: Effects on the Developing Brain, 335-40 (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1998).
209. Danaher, J., Part C updates (Chapel Hill: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center,University of North Carolina, 2002)
210. Hurley, D., Early childhood educators' beliefs and knowledge about the effects of prenatal exposure to alcohol, crack, cocaine, and a combination of substances on infants and young children, Ph.D. dissertation, Southern Illinois University, 1992.
211. Chapman, J. K., and Elliott, R. N., Preschoolers exposed to cocaine: Early childhood special education and Head Start preparation, Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 2 (1995), 118-29.
212. Pawl, J. H., Interventions to strengthen relationships between infants and drug-abusing or recovering parents, Zero to Three, 13, 1 (1992), 6-10;
213. Van Bremen, J. R., and Chasnoff, I. J., Policy issues for integrating parenting interventions and addiction treatment for women, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 2 (1994), 254-74;
214. Harvey, C., Comfort, H. C., and Johns, N., Integrating parenting support into residential drug and alcohol treatment programs, Zero to Three, 13, 1 (1992), 11-13.
215. Merikangas, K., and Stevens, D. E., Substance abuse among women: Familial factors and comorbidity, in Wetherington, C. L., and Roman, A. B. (eds.), Drug addiction research and the health of women (Washington,D.C: National Institutes on Drug Abuse, 1998).;
216. Cohen, F. S., and Denser-Gerber, J., A study of the relationship between child abuse and drug addiction in 178 patients: Preliminary results, Child Abuse and Neglect, 6 (1982), 383-87.
217. Howard, J., Beckwith, L., Rodning, C., and Kropenska, V., The development of young children of substance-abusing parents: Insights from seven years of intervention and research, Zero to Three, 9 (1989), 8-16;
218. Baxter, A., Butler, L. S., Brinkler, R. P., Frazier, W. A., and Wedgeworth, D. M., Effective early intervention for children prenatally exposed to cocaine in an inner-city context, in Lewis, M., and Bendersky, M. (eds.), Mothers, babies and cocaine:The role of toxins in development, 335-53 (Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995).
219. Heinicke, C. M., Beckwith, L., and Thompson, A., Early intervention in the family system: A framework and review, Infant Mental Health Journal, 9 (1988), 111-41.
220. Leif, N. R., The drug user as a parent, International Journal of Addictions, 20, 1 (1985), 63-97;
221. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Blending perspectives and building common ground: The complexity of child and family needs. A report to Congress on substance abuse and child protection (Washington,D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1999).
222. Harvey, C., Comfort, M., and Johns, N. (1992). Integrating parent support into residential drug and alcohol treatment programs. Zero to Three 13 (1), 11-13.
223. Tracey, E.,Maternal substance abuse: Protecting the child, preserving the family, Social Work, 37, 5 (1994), 18-25;
224. Hawley, T. L., Halle, T. G., Drasin, R. E., & Thomas, N. G. (1995). Children of addicted mothers: Effects of the "crack-epidemic" on the caregiving environment and the development of the preschooler. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 364-379.
225. Wilson, B. L., Treatment for two, Governing, 4, 10 (1991), 36-41;
226. Haller, D. L., Recovery for two: Pregnancy and addiction, Addiction and Recovery, July/August 1991, 14-18.
227. Chasnoff, I. J., Anson, A. R., and Iaukea, K. A., Understanding the drug-exposed child: Approaches to behavior and learning (Chicago: Imprint Publications, 1998), 23.
228. Freier, M., Griffith, D., and Chasnoff, I., In utero drug exposure: Developmental follow-up and maternal infant interaction, Seminars in Perinatology, 15 (1991), 310-16.
229. Manning, J. B., and Rodriguez, L., Community for learning: Connection with community services, in Wang,M. C., and Boyd,W. L. (eds.), Improving results for children and families:Linking collaborative services with school reform efforts, 19-33 (Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing, 2000).
230. Singer, L. T., Arendt, R.,Minnes, S., Farkas, K., Salvator, A., Kirchner, H. L., and Kliegman, R., Cognitive and motor outcomes of cocaine-exposed infants, Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 15 (2002), 1952-60.