Scientific models as works

Works as Entities for Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 129-160

  Coleman, Anita S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cataloging; Dublin core metadata; Indexing; Information retrieval; Scientific models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917315163     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203049624     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology Online, (San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, 2001), http://www.academicpress.com/dictionary/ [Accessed 31 January, 2002].
2. Anglo-American Cataloging Rules: 2nd Edition, 1998 Revision with 1999 Amendments [Electronic edition], (Washington D.C.: Library of Congress, 2001), Part I.
3. Cartier, Jennifer et al., “The Nature and Structure of Scientific Models” [online], National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science (NCISLA), University of Wisconsin-Madison, http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/ [Accessed 31 January, 2002].
4. Cleverdon, Cyril W. 1991. The significance of the Cranfield Tests on index languages, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, September 1991, Chicago, Illinois. Baltimore, Maryland: ACM Press.
5. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description [online], http:dublincore.org/dces/ [Accessed 31 January 2002].
6. Earth System Science: A Closer View. 1988. Washington D.C.: NASA.
7. Encyclopedia Britannica Online, http://search.eb.com/bol/search?type=topic&query=model&DBase=Articles&x=30&y=3 [Accessed 31 January, 2002].
8. Heckhausen, Heinz. 1972. Disciplines and interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Paris: OECD.
9. Hill, Linda H. et al. 2001. A content standard for computational models, D-Lib Magazine 7 http://www.dlib.org/ [Accessed 31 January 2002].
10. Library of Congress Subject Headings. 2001. In The Cataloger's Desktop [CD-ROM], Washington D.C.: CDS.
11. Modeling for Understanding in Science Education [online], University of Wiscon- sin-Madison, http://www.weer.wisc.edu/ncisla/muse/index.html [Accessed 31 January 2002].
12. Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. Ed. J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), OED Online, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4 Apr. 2000), http://oed.com/cgi/entry/00149259 [Accessed 31 January, 2002].
13. Smiraglia, Richard P. 2001. The nature of “a work”: Implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow.
14. Thinkertools: The Thinker Tools Scientific Inquiry and Modeling Project [online], University of California at Berkeley, http://thinkertools.soe.berkeley.edu/ [Accessed 31 January 2002].
15. Tillett, Barbara. 1991. A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library resources & technical services 35: 150-158.
16. von Storch, Hans. 2001. Models in environmental research. Berlin: Springer.
17. Wilson, Patrick. 1983. The catalog as access mechanism: Background and concepts. Library resources & technical services 27: 7.
18. Wilson, Patrick, 2002. On accepting the ASIST Award of Merit. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 28: 11.