The challenge of designing inquiry-based online learning environments: Theory into practice

Learner-Centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education: Cases From Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 143-165

  Lani Gunawardena, Charlotte N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917294361     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609489     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Aspy, D. N., Aspy, C. B., & Quimby, P. M. (1993). What doctors can teach teachers about problem-based learning. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 22-24.
2. Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link?. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 17-34). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (National Research Council). Washington DC: National Academy Press.
4. Crandall, S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1999). Using the Web for facilitating problem-based learning and case-based reasoning in the training of pre-clinical medical students. In Proceedings of the WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet (pp. 1232-1233). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
5. Eastmond, D. V. (1994). Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Distance Education, 15(1), 128-152.
6. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-15.
7. Garrison, R., & Baynton, M. (1987). Beyond independence in distance education: The concept of control. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(1), 3-15.
8. Gunawardena, C. N. (1992). Changing faculty roles for audiographics and online teaching. The American Journal of Distance Education, 6(3), 58-71.
9. Gunawardena, C. N., Boverie, P., Wilson, P. L., Lowe, C. A., Ortegano-Layne, L., Lindemann, K., Mummert, J., & Rodriguez, F. (2001, December). First-year evaluation report of the Star Schools Web-based math and science teacher education program developed by Oklahoma State University (Study funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Grant No. R203f000039). Albuquerque,NM:University of New Mexico, Organizational Learning and Instructional Technologies, Program College of Education.
10. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 395-429.
11. Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., López-Islas, J. R., Ramírez-Angel, N., Megchun-Alpízar, R. M. (2001). A cross-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22(1), 85-121.
12. Gunawardena, C. N., Walsh, S., Reddinger, L., Gregory, E., Lake, Y., & Davies, A. (2002). Negotiating "face" in a non-face-to-face learning environment (pp. 89-106). In F. Sudweeks & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology 2002. Quebec, Canada: University of Montreal.
13. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-25.
14. Jeong, A. (2001). Supporting critical thinking with group discussion on threaded bulletin boards: An analysis of group interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
15. Jones, S. G. (1995). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Jones, S. G. (Ed.). (1997). Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. London: Sage.
17. Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (2000). Mapping the dynamics of peer group interaction: A method of analysis of socially shared learning processes. In H. Cowie & van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 144-160). Amsterdam:Pergamon, Advances in Learning and Instruction Series.
18. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Liedtka, J. (1999). Linking competitive advantage with communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(1), 5-17.
20. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mayo, P., Donnelly, M. B., Nash, P. P., & Schwartz, R. W. (1993). Student perceptions of tutor effectiveness in problem based surgery clerkship. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 5, 227-233.
22. Moore, M. G. (1973). Towards a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44, 661-679.
23. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24. Reschke, K. (2001). The family child care forum: An innovative model for effective online training for family child care providers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana.
25. Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. & Teasley, S. D. (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
27. Rojas-Drummond, S. (2000). Guided participation, discourse and the construction of knowledge in Mexican classrooms. In H. Cowie & van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 191-213). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
28. Romero, M. E. (1994, Fall). Identifying giftedness among Keresan Pueblo Indians: The Keres study. Journal of American Indian Education, 34(1), 35-58.
29. Saba, F. (1988). Integrated telecommunications systems and instructional transaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(3), 17-24.
30. Saba, F., & Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.
31. Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-257). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
33. Vernon, D. T., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550-563.
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (2000). Language for thinking: A study of children solving reasoning test problems together. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 179-192). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
36. Wenger, E. C.,&Snyder,W.M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-146.
37. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.