What can western psychology learn from indigenous psychologies?-Lessons from Hindu psychology

Culture and Human Development: The Importance of Cross-Cultural Research for the Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 30-48

  Chakkarath, Pradeep ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917281642     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203015056     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Achenbaum, W, A., & Bengtson, V.L. (1994). Re-engaging the disengagement theory of aging: On the history and assessment of theory development in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 34, 756-763.
2. nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bharati, A. (1985). The self in Hindu thought and action, In A.J.Marsella, G. Devos, & F.L.K.Hsu (Eds,). Culture and Self: Asian and western perspectives (pp. 185-230). London: Tavistock.
4. Chakkarath, P. (2003), Kultur und Psychologie: Zur wissenschaftlichen Entstehung und zur Ortsbestimmung der Kulturpsychologie [Culture and psychology: On the scientific origin and the present state of cultural psychology]. Hamburg, Germany: Dr. Kovac.
5. Chakkarath, P. (in press). Religionen und Weltanschauungen [Religions and worldviews]. In G.Trommsdorff & H.-J.Kornadt (Eds.), Kulturvergleichende Psychologie. Vol. 1: Theorien und Methoden in der kulturvergleichenden und kulturpsychologischen Forschung (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C The-orie und Forschung, Serie VII). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
6. th Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
7. Cumming, E., & Henry, W. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
8. Enriquez, V.G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U.Kim & J.W.Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies; Research and experience in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Gergen, K.J., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51, 496-503.
10. Greenfield, P. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 223-240.
11. Heelas, P., & Lock, A. (Eds.). (1981). Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self. London: Academic Press.
12. Hitchcock, J.T., & Minturn, L. (1963). The Rajput of Khalapur, India. In B.B. Whiting (Ed.), Six cultures: Studies of child rearing (pp. 203-362). New York: Wiley.
13. Ho, D.F.Y. (1998). Indigenous psychologies: Asian perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 88-103.
14. th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs-A crosscultural sourcebook: Political, religious, sexual, and economic norms in 43 societies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16. nd edition). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
17. Keller, H. (2002). Development as the interface between biology and culture: A conceptualization of early ontogenetic experiences. In H.Keller, Y.H.Poortinga, & A.Schölmerich (Eds.), Between culture and biology: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 215-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kim, U. (1990). Indigenous psychology: Science and applications. In R.W.Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Kim, U., (2001). Culture, Science, and Indigenous Psychologies: An Integrated Analysis. In D.Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 51-75). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
20. Kim, U., & Berry, J.W. (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Landers, C. (1989). A psychobiological study of infant development in South India. In J.K.Nugent, B.M.Lester, & T.B.Brazelton (Eds.), The cultural context of infancy ( pp. 169-208 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation, Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
23. Mascolo, M.F., Misra, G., & Rapisardi, C. (2004). Individual and relational conceptions of self in India and the United States. In W.Damon (Series Ed.), M.F. Mascolo & J.Li (Vol. Eds.), New directions in child and adolescent development, 104. Culture and developing selves: Beyond dichotomization (pp. 9-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. Miller, J.G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
25. Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzanan, A. (2001). Culture and system of thoughts:Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
26. Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
27. Paranjipe, A. (1984), Theoretical psychology: Meeting of East and West. New York:Plenum Press.
28. Paranjipe, A. (1988). A personality theory according to Vedanta. In A.Paranjipe, D. Ho, & R.Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 185-214). New York:Praeger.
29. Paranjpe, A.C. (1998). Self and identity in modern psychology and Indian thought. New York: Plenum Press.
30. Piaget, J. (1990). The child's conception of the world. New York: Littlefield Adams.
31. Saraswathi, T.S., & Ganapathy, H. (2002). Indian parents' ethnotheories as reflections of the Hindu scheme of child and human development. In H.Keller, Y.H. Poortinga, & A.Schölmerich (Eds.), Between culture and biology: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 79-88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Schaie, K.W., & Willis, S.L. (2000). A stage theory model of adult cognitive development revisited. In B.Rubinstein, M.Moss, & M.Kleban (Eds.), The many dimensions of aging: Essays in honor of M.Powell Lawton (pp. 175-193). New York:Springer.
33. Segall, M.H., Lonner, W.J., & Berry, J.W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline. American Psychologist, 53, 1101-1110.
34. Shweder, R. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207-222.
35. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J.W.Berry, Y.H.Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1: Theory and method (pp. 129-169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R.C. (1994). Individualism in a collective culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U.Kim, H.C.Triandis, C.Kagitçibasi, S.-C.Choi, & G.Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 123-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Super, C.M., & Harkness, S. (1997). The cultural structuring of child development. In J.W.Berry, P.R.Dasen, & T.S.Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Vol. 2: Basic processes and human development (pp. 1-39). Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
38. Thomas, R.M. (1990). Hindu theory of human development. In R.M.Thomas (Ed.), The encyclopedia of human development and education: Theory, research, and studies (pp. 140-144). New York: Pergamon Press.
39. Thomas, R.M. (1997). Moral development theories-Secular and religious: A comparative study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
40. Triandis, H.C. (2001). Individualism and collectivism: Past, present, and future. In D.Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture & psychology (pp. 35-50). London:Oxford University Press.
41. Trommsdorff, G., & Dasen, P. (2001). Cross-cultural study of education. In N.J. Smelser & P.B.Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 3003-3007), Oxford: Elsevier.
42. Trommsdorff, G., & Kornadt, H.-J. (2003). Parent-child relations in cross-cultural perspective. In L.Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 271-306). London: Sage.