Developments in EIA methods

Environmental Impact Assessment: Theroy and Practice

Volumn 9780203409978, Issue , 2013, Pages 47-61

  Bisset, Ronald ^a  

^a Cobham Resource Consultants ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917074923     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203409978     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Andrews, R.N.L. 1973. Approaches to impact assessment: comparison and critique. Paper presented to short course on Impact Assessment in Water Resource Planning, Ann Arbor, Mich., 9 June.
2. Beanlands, G.E. & P.N.Duinker, 1982. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
3. Bisset, R. 1978. Quantification, decision-making and environmental impact assessment in the United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Management, 7, 43-58.
4. Bisset, R. 1984a. Methods for assessing direct impacts. in Perspectives on environmental impact assessment, B.D.Clark, A.Gilad, R.Bisset & P.Tomlinson (eds), 195-212. Dordecht: Reidel.
5. Bisset, R. 1984b. Post-development audits to investigate the accuracy of environmental impact predictions. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, 7, 463-84.
6. Caldwell, L.K., R.V.Bartlett, D.E.Parker, & D.L.Keys, 1982. A study of ways to improve the scientific content and methodology of environmental impact analysis. Advanced Studies in Science, Technology and Public Affairs, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington.
7. Canter, L.W. 1983. Methods for environmental impact assessment: theory and application (emphasis on weighting-scaling checklists and networks). In Environmental impact assessment, PADC Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning Unit (eds), 165-233. The Hague: Nijhoff.
8. Clark, B. D., R. Bisset, and P. Wathern, 1980. Environmental impact assessment. London: Mansell.
9. Collins, J.P. & E.A.Glysson, 1980. Multivariate utility theory and environmental decisions. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 106, no. EE4, 815-30.
10. Dee, N., J. K. Baker, N. L. Drobny, K. M. Duke, I. Whitman, & D. C. Fahringer, 1973. Environmental evaluation system for water resource planning. Water Resources Research, 9, 523-35.
11. Doremus, C., D. C. McNaught, P. Cross, T. Fuist, E. Stanley, & B. Youngberg, 1978. An ecological approach to environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management, 2, 245-8.
12. Environment Canada 1982. Review and evaluation of adaptive environmental assessment and management. Vancouver: Environment Canada.
13. Everitt, R.R. 1983. Adaptive environmental assessment and management: some current applications. in Environmental impact assessment, PADC Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning Unit (eds), 293-306. The Hague: Nijhoff.
14. Fritz, E.S., P.J.Rago, & I.D.Murarka, 1980. Strategy for assessing impacts of power plants on fish and shellfish populations. FWS/OBS-80/34. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington DC.
15. Gallopin, G., T.R.Lee, & M.Nelson, 1980. The environmental dimension in water management: the case of the dam at Salto Grande. Water Supply and Management, 4, 221-41.
16. Gilliland, M.W. & P.G.Risser, 1977. The use of systems diagrams for environmental impact assessment: procedures and an application. Ecological Modelling, 3, 188-209.
17. Hollick, M. 1981. The role of quantitative decision-making methods in environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 12, 65-78.
18. Holling, C.S. (ed). 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley.
19. Keeney, R.L. & H.Raiffa, 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
20. Keeney, R.L. & G.A.Robilliard, 1977. Assessing and evaluating environmental impacts at proposed nuclear power plant sites. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 4, 153-66.
21. Kirkwood, C.W. 1982. A case history of nuclear power plant site selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33, 353-63.
22. Lavine, M.J., T.Butler, & A.H.Meyburg, 1978. Bridging the gap between economic and environmental concerns in EIA. EIA Review, 2, 28-32.
23. Leopold, L. B., F. E. Clark, B. B. Hanshaw, & J. R. Balsley, 1971. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. US Geological Survey Circular 645, Department of the Interior, Washington DC.
24. Longley, W.L. 1979. An environmental impact assessment procedure emphasizing changes in the organization and function of ecological systems. in Proceedings of the Ecological Damage Conference, 355-77. Society of Petroleum Industry Biologists, Los Angeles.
25. Mekong Secretariat 1982. Nam Pong Environmental Management Research Project, Phase III. Mekong Secretariat, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok.
26. Mongkol, P. 1982. A conceptual development of quantitative environmental impact assessment methodology for decision-makers. Journal of Environmental Management, 14, 301-7.
27. Odum, H.T. 1971. Environment, power and society. New York: Wiley Interscience.
28. Odum, H.T. 1972. Use of energy diagrams for environmental impact statements. in Proceedings of the Conference Tools of Coastal Management, 197-231. Marine Technology Society, Washington DC.
29. Sanders, F.S. et al. 1980. Strategies for ecological effects assessment at DOE energy activity sites. ORNL/TM-6783. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn.
30. Solomon, R. C., B. K.Colbert, W. J. Hanson, S. E. Richardson, L. W. Canter & E. C. Vlachos, 1977. Water resources assessment methodology (WRAM)—impact assessment and alternative evaluation. Technical Report no. Y-77—1. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss.
31. Sondheim, M.W. 1978. A comprehensive methodology for assessing environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management, 6, 27-42.
32. Sonntag, N., R.R.Everitt, & M.J.Staley, 1980. Integration: a role for adaptive environmental assessment and management. in Proceedings of the Symposium on Effects of Air Pollutants on Mediterranean and Temperate Forest Ecosystems, Report PWS-43, P. Miller (ed.), Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, Calif.
33. Srivardhana, R. 1983. The Nam Pong case study: some lessons to be learned. Working paper of the East. West Environment Policy Institute, East West Center, Hawaii.
34. Staley, M.J. 1978. Report of a simulation modelling workshop on the environmental effects of Albert oil sands development. Vancouver: Environmental and Social Systems Analysts Ltd. (ESSA).
35. State of Texas General Land Office 1978. Activity Assessment Routine: Ecological Systems Component (User’s Manual). State of Texas General Land Office, Austin, Tex.
36. Truett, J.C. 1978. Ecosystem process analysis—a new approach to impact assessment. in Proceedings of the Symposium Energy/Environment’78, 70-5. Society of Petroleum Industry Biologists, Los Angeles.
37. Uys, P. 1981. Modelling the environmental impact of energy supply in South Africa— a preliminary report. Research Report 25, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Pretoria.
38. von Neumann, J. & O.Morgenstern, 1953. Theory of games and economic behaviour, 3rd edn. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
39. Ward, D.V. 1978. Biological environmental impact studies: theory and methods. New York: Academic Press.
40. Wathern, P. 1984. Methods for assessing indirect impacts. in Perspectives on environmental impact assessment, B.D.Clark, A.Gilad, R.Bisset & P.Tomlinson (eds), 213-31. Dordrecht: Reidel.
41. Yapijakis, C. 1983. A comprehensive methodology for project appraisal and environmental protection in multinational water resources development. Paper presented to the Symposium on Environmental Impact Assessment: Current Status and Future Prospects, Crete, April 10-17.