Payment for agricultural ecosystem services and its valuation

The Economics of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 53-61

  Yoshida, Kentaro ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916999956     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203097878     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Adamowicz, V., Boxall, P., Williams, M. and Louviere, J., 1998, “Stated preference approach for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1): 74–75.
2. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R., 1985, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
3. Bergstrom, J. C., and De Civita, P., 1999, “Status of benefits transfer in the United States and Canada: A review,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47: 79–87.
4. Downing, M. and Ozuna, T. Jr., 1996, “Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3): 316–322.
5. Garrod, G. and Willis, K. G., 1999, Economic Valuation of the Environment: Models and Case Studies, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
6. Haener, M. K. Boxall P. C. and Adamowicz, W. L., 2001, “Modeling recreation site choice: Do hypothetical choices reflect actual behavior?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3): 629–642.
7. Kirchhoff, S., Colby, B. G. and LaFrance, J. T., 1997, “Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33(1): 75–93.
8. Kunimitsu, Y., Matsuo, Y. and Tomosyo, T., 2001, “The causative factors about contingent valuation of rural park and the transferability of WTP function: Mainly about individual attributes, consolidation conditions, and area situations,” Journal of Rural Planning Association, 20(1): 31–40.
9. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D., 2000, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10. McFadden, D., 1973, “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior”, in P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiera in Econometrics, New York, Academic Press.
11. Mangione, T. W., 1995, Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality, London, Sage Publications.
12. Morrison, M. and Bergland, O., 2006, “Prospects for the use of choice modeling for benefit transfer,” Ecological Economics, 60(2): 420–428.
13. Poe, G. L., Severance-Lossin, E. K. and Welsh, M. P., 1994, “Measuring the difference (X – Y) of simulated distributions: A convolutions approach,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(4): 904–915.
14. Poe, G. L., Giraud, K. L. and Loomis, J. B., 2005, “Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2): 353–365.
15. Swait, J. and Louviere, J., 1993, “The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of multinomial logit models,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3): 305–314.
16. Terawaki, T., 2000, “Benefit function transfer in agricultural public work,” Journal of Rural Economics, 71(4): 179–186.
17. Tsuge, T., 2001, “The valuation of the externalities of forest on citizen’s preferences and possibility of use in a policy-making: A choice experiment study,” Environmental Science, 14(5): 465–476.
18. Yoshida, K., 2000, “Assessing the convergent validity of environmental benefit estimates by a benefit transfer approach: Applications of meta-analysis and benefit function transfer,” Journal of Rural Economics, 72(3): 122–130.