The memory, unification, and control (MUC) model of language

Automaticity and Control in Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 243-270

  Hagoort, Peter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916983804     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203968512     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H., & Boland, J. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112-130.
2. Aleman, A., Formisano, E., Koppenhagen, H., Hagoort, P., De Haan, E. H. F., & Kahn, R. S. (2005). The functional neuroanatomy of metrical stress evaluation of perceived and imagined spoken words. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 221-228.
3. Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 32-60). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
4. Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
5. Boland, J. E., & Cutler, A. (1996). Interaction with autonomy: Multiple output models and the inadequacy of the great divide. Cognition, 58, 309-320.
6. Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151-188.
7. Botvinick, M. B., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
8. Bresnan, J. W. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34-44.
10. Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215-222.
11. Caplan, D., Hildebrandt, N., & Makris, N. (1996). Location of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Brain, 119, 933-949.
12. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
15. Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. E. (1999). Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 123-166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. D. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380, 499-505.
17. Duncan, J., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Cognitive focus through adaptive neural coding in the primate prefrontal cortex. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 278-292). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
19. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164-203.
20. Fodor, J. D. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 559-585). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
22. Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259-281.
23. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78-84.
24. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
25. Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192.
26. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
27. Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension:ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 883-899.
28. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton Jr, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531-1549.
30. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
31. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273-317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
33. Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. M. (2003). Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 38-50.
34. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339-356.
35. Hahne, A., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2001). What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 199-212.
36. Harbusch, K., & Kempen, G. (2002). A quantitative model of word order and movement in English, Dutch and German complement constructions. Paper presented at the 19th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING-2002), San Francisco.
37. Indefrey, P. (2004). Hirnaktivierungen bei syntaktischer Sprachverarbeitung: Eine Meta-Analyse. In G. Rickheit & H. M. Mueller (Eds.), Neurokognition in der Sprache (pp. 31-50). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
38. Indefrey, P., & Cutler, A. (2004). Prelexical and lexical processing in listening. In M. D. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 759-774). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
39. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2000). The neural correlates of language production. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 845-865). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Jackendoff, R. (1999). The representational structures of the language faculty and their interactions. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 37-79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Joshi, A. K., & Schabes, Y. (1997). Treeadjoining grammars. In A. Salomma & G. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of formal languages and automata (Vol. 3, pp. 69-124). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
43. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159-201.
44. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003a). Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: A comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 621-635.
45. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003b). Repair, revision and complexity in syntactic analysis:An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98-110.
46. Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing:Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205-225.
47. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clauselevel ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
48. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 573-633.
50. Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117-129.
51. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic anomaly. Science, 207, 203-205.
52. Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. K. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83-143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
55. MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383-391.
56. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
58. Martin, R. C., & He, T. (2004). Semantic short-term memory and its role in sentence processing: A replication. Brain and Language, 89, 76-82.
59. Martin, R. C., & Romani, C. (1994). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-component view. Neuropsychology, 8, 506-523.
60. McKinnon, R., & Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 495-523.
61. Mesulam, M.-M. (2002). The human frontal lobes: Transcending the default mode through contingent encoding. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 8-31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Miller, E. K. (2000). The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nature Review Neuroscience, 1, 59-65.
63. Münte, T. F., & Heinze, H. J. (1994). ERP negativities during syntactic processing of written words. In H. J. Heinze, T. F. Münte, & H. R. Mangun (Eds.), Cognitive electrophysiology (pp. 211-238). Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
64. Münte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., & Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335-344.
65. Münte, T. F., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruities in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 300-311.
66. Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
67. O'Seaghdha, P. G. O. (1997). Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 807-828.
68. Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McKinnon, R. (1997). Brain potentials elicited by words: Word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biological Psychology, 46, 143-168.
69. Osterhout, L., & Hagoort, P. (1999). A superficial resemblance doesn't necessarily mean you're part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King, & Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS debate. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 1-14.
70. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
71. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly:Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413-438.
72. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 171-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786-803.
74. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
75. Patel, A. D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674-681.
76. Roelofs, A., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Control of language use: Cognitive modeling the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 85-97.
77. Rösler, F., Friederici, A. D., Pütz, P., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345-362.
78. Saffran, E., & Sholl, A. (1999). Clues to the functional and neural architecture of word meaning. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 241-273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Scott, S. K., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2003). The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 100-107.
80. Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 315-332). New York: Academic Press.
81. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
82. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., & Kan, E. P. (1999). Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron, 23, 513-522.
83. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
84. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
85. Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 683-692.
86. Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999a). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
87. Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999b). When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 555-571.
88. Van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2004). The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1068-1084.
89. Van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 241-255.
90. Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. A. M. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105-143.
91. Wassenaar, M., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Word-category violations in patients with Broca's aphasia: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 92, 117-137.
92. Wassenaar, M., & Hagoort, P. (accepted). Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: sentence-picture matching electrified. Neuropsychologia.
93. Zurif, E. B. (1998). The neurological organization of some aspects of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 181-190.
94. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.