Opening doors: What a right to housing means for women

A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 296-315

  Saegert, Susan ^a   Clark, Heléne ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916983586     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. AmericanHousing Survey (2001), U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2. Amott, Teresa, and Julie Matthaei. 1996. Race, gender and work, Rev. Ed. Boston: South End Press.
3. Angel, Ronald J., and Jacqueline L.Angel. 1993. Painful inheritance: Health and the new generations of fatherless families. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Appleton, Lynn M. 1995. The gender regime of American cities. In Gender in urban research, eds. Judith A. Garber and Robyne S. Turner, 44-59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
5. Ardener, Shirley, ed. 1981. Women and space: Ground rules and social maps. London: Croom Helm.
6. Berk, Sarah F. 1980. The household as workplace: Wives, husbands, and children. In New Space for Women, eds. GerdaWekerle, Rebecca Peterson and DavidMorley, 65-81.Boulder, CO:WestviewPress.
7. Birch, Eugenie Ladner. 1985. The unsheltered woman: Women and housing in the 80s. NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8. Bratt, Rachel G., and Langley C. Keyes. 1998. Challenges confronting nonprofit housing organizations' self-sufficiencyprograms. Housing PolicyDebate, 9(4):795-824.
9. Briggs, Xavier de Souza, and Elisabeth Mueller (with Mercer Sullivan). 1997. From Neighborhood to community: Evidence of the social effects of community development. New York: Community Development Research Center, New School for Social Research.
10. Clark, Heĺene, Susan Saegert, Eric K. Glunt and William Roane. 1990. The future of limited equity housing in New York City: Residents struggle for stability. New York: Center for Human Environments.
11. Connell, James P., Anne C. Kubisch, Lisbeth B. Schorr and Carol H. Weiss. 1995. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
12. Costello, Cynthia B., Vanessa R. Wight and Anne J. Stone. 2002. The American woman 2003-2004. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Coulton, Claudia, Laura Leete and Neil Bania. 1999. Housing, transportation, and access to suburban jobs by welfare recipients in the Cleveland area. InThe home front: Implications of welfare reform for housing policy, ed. Sandra Newman. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
14. Council of Large Public Housing Authorities (CLPHA). 1996. Summary tenant statistics. Washington, DC: CLPHA.
15. Cowan, Spencer M., William M. Rohe and Esmail Baku. 1999. Factors influencing the performance of community development corporations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(3):325-340.
16. Darke, Jane. 1994.Women and the meaning of home. In Housing women, eds. Rose Gilroy and Roberta Woods, 11-30. London: Routledge.
17. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1999. HOPE VI fact sheet. www.hud.gov/pih/programs/ph/hope6/facts.pdf.
18. Domash, Mona, and Joni Seager. 2001. Putting women in place: Feminist geographermake sense of the world. New York: Guilford Press.
19. Dreier, Peter. 1997. The new politics of housing: How to rebuild the constituency for a progressive federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1):5-27.
20. Edin, Katheryn, and Laura Lein. 1997. Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and lowwage work. New York: Russell Sage.
21. Eggers, Frederick J., and Paul E. Burke. 1996. Can the national homeownership rate be significantly improved by reaching underserved markets? Housing Policy Debate, 7(1):83-102.
22. Evans, Gary W., Nancy M. Wells and Annie Moch. 2003. Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59:475-501.
23. Farley, Reynolds. 1996. The new American reality: Who we are, how we got here, where we are going. New York: Russell Sage.
24. Feldman, Roberta. 1999. Participatory design at the grass roots. In Design and feminism: Re-visioning spaces, places, and everyday things, ed. Joan Rothschild, 135-148. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25. Franck, Karen A. 2002.Women and environments. In Handbook of environmental psychology, eds. Robert Bechtel and Arza Churchman, 347-362. New York: Wiley and Sons.
26. Freeman, Lance. 1998. Interpreting the dynamics of public housing: Cultural and rational choice explanations. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2):323-352.
27. Friedman, AliceT. 1999. Shiftingtheparadigm:Houses built for women. In Design and feminism: Revisioning spaces, places, and everyday things, ed. Joan Rothschild, 85-98. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
28. Galster, George C., and Edward M. Hill. 1992. The metropolis in black and white. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.
29. Garber, Judith A., and Robyne S. Turner. 1995. Introduction. In Gender in urban research, X-XXVI, eds. Judith A. Garber and Robyne S. Turner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
30. Gittell, Marilyn, Jill Gross and Kathe Newman. 1994. Race and gender in neighborhood development organizations. New York: The Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, Graduate School and University Center, CityUniversity of New York.
31. Gittell, Marilyn, Sally Covington and Jill Gross. 1994. The difference gender makes: Women in neighborhood development organizations. New York: The Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York.
32. Gittell, Marilyn, IsoldaOrtega-Bustamante and Tracey Steffy. 1999. Women creating social capital and social change: A study of women-led community development organizations. New York: The Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York.
33. Gittell, Ross, and MargeretWilder. 1999. Community development corporations: Critical factors that influence success. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(3):345-361.
34. Glickman, Norman J., and Lisa J. Servon. 1999. More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3):497-539.
35. Goering, John, AliKamely and Todd Richardson. 1997. Recent research on racial segregation and poverty concentration in public housing in the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 32(5):723-745
36. Goldin, Claudia. 1997. Career and family: College women look to the past. InGender and family issues in the workplace, eds. Francine D. Blau and Ronald C. Ehrenberg, 20-58.NewYork:Russell Sage Foundation.
37. Grimm, K., and Jaime C.Maldonado. 1995. No home of her own: Gender and homelessness. Women & Environments, 14(2):20-22.
38. Hardy, Melissa. A., and Lawrence D. Hazelrigg. 1993. The gender of poverty in an aging population. Research on Aging, 15(3):243-278.
39. Hayden, Dolores. 1980. What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design and human work. Signs, 5 (Supp.):167-184.
40. Hayden, Dolores. 2002. Redesigning the American Dream: Gender, housing, and family life (revised and expanded). New York: Norton.
41. Hunt, Pauline. 1989. Gender and the construction of home life. InHome and family: Creating the domestic sphere, eds. Graham Allan and Graham Crow. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
42. Jargowsky, Paul A. 1997. Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43. Jarrett, Robyn. 1995. Growing up poor: The family experiences of socially mobile youth in low-income African American neighborhoods. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10:111-135.
44. Jezierski, Louise. 1995. Women organizing their place in restructuring economies. In Gender in urban research, eds. Judith A. Garber and Robyne S. Turner, 60-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
45. Joint Center for Housing Studies. 2003. State of the nation's housing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
46. Kasarda, John D., and Kwok-fai Ting. 1996. Joblessness and poverty inAmerica's central cities: Causes and policy prescriptions. Housing Policy Debate, 7(2):387-419.
47. Knecht, Barbara. 1999. Special needs and housing design: Myths/realities/opportunities. In Design and feminism: Re-visioning spaces, places, and everyday things, ed. Joan Rothschild, 99-108. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
48. Koshinksy, Julia. 1998. Challenging the third sector housing approach: The impact of federal policies (1980-1996). Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(2):117-119.
49. Leavitt, Jacqueline, and Susan Saegert. 1990. From abandonment to hope: Community households in Harlem. New York: Columbia University Press.
50. Leventhal, Tama, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 2000. The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence upon child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (2):309-337.
51. Mason, Jennifer. 1989. Reconstructing the public and private: The home and marriage in later life. In Home and family: Creating the domestic sphere, eds. Graham Allan & Graham Crow. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
52. Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A.Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregationandthe making of the underclass. CambridgeMA: Harvard University Press.
53. McFate, Katherine, Roger Lawson and William Julius Wilson. 1995. Poverty, inequality and the future of social policy:Western states and the new world order. New York: Russell Sage.
54. Meyers, Dennis. 1992. Analysis with local census data: Portraits of change. New York: Academic Press. National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty. 2001. Overview. http://www.nlchp.org/FAHAPIA/.
55. Newman, Sandra, ed. 1999. The home front: Implications of welfare reform for housing policy. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
56. Oliver, Melvin L., and Thomas M. Shapiro. 1995. Black wealth/White wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.
57. Quercia, Robert B., Michael A. Stegman, Walter R. Davis and Eric Stein. 2002. Performance of community reinvestment loans: Implications for secondary market purchases. In Low-income homeownership: Examining the unexamined goal, eds. Nicolas P. Retsinas and Eric S. Belsky, 348-374. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies.
58. Rae, Ruth. 1997. Ownership and equity: Perceptions of ownership by low-incomeowners of limited equity cooperative housing. Doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York Graduate School and University Center.
59. Rasmussen, David W., Isaac F. Megbolugbe and Barbara A. Morgan. 1997. The reverse mortgage as an asset management tool. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1):173-194.
60. Ratner, Mitchell S. 1996. Many routes to homeownership: A four-site ethnographic study of minority and immigrant experiences. Housing PolicyDebate, 7(1):103-146.
61. Robinson, John P., and Geoffrey Godbey. 1997. Time for life: The surprising waysAmericans use their time. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
62. Rohe, William M., and Rachel G. Bratt. 2003. Failures, downsizings and mergers among community development corporations. Housing Policy Debate 14(1/2):1-46.
63. Rollins, Joan H., Renee N. Saris and Ingrid Johnston- Robledo. 2001. Low-income women speak out about housing: A high-stakes game of musical chairs. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2):277-298.
64. Rosenbaum, James E. 1991. Black pioneers-Do their moves to the suburbs increase economic opportunity for mothers and children? Housing Policy Debate, 2(4):1179-1213.
65. Rossi, Peter H., and Eleanor Weber. 1996. The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence fromnational surveys.HousingPolicyDebate, 7(1):1-36.
66. Rothblatt, Donald N., Daniel Garr and Jo Sprague. 1979. The suburban environment and women. New York: Praeger.
67. Saegert, Susan. 1982. Towards the and rogynous city. In Cities in the 21st century, eds. Gary Gappert and Richard V. Knight. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
68. Saegert, Susan. 1989. Unlikely leaders, extreme circumstances: Older Black women building community households. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(3):295-316.
69. Saegert, Susan. 1993. Survey of residents of currently and previously city-ownedbuildings inthe Bronx. InHousing in the balance: Seeking a comprehensive policy for city-owned housing, ed.M. Cotton, 17-48. Consumer Farmer Foundation for the Task Force on City Owned Property.
70. Saegert, Susan. 1995. What we have to work with: The lessons of the Task Force surveys. In No more housing of last resort: The importance of affordability and resident participation in in Rem housing, ed. Michelle Cotton, 35-63. New York: Parodneck Foundation for the Task Force on City Owned Property.
71. Saegert, Susan, and Lymari Benitez. 2003. Limited equity housing cooperatives: A review of the literature. Report to the Taconic Foundation. New York: Global Foundations Group of JPMorgan Private Bank.
72. Saegert, Susan, Phillip J. Thompson, Robert Engle and Joselyn Sargent. 2000. Stretched thin: Employment, parenting, and social capitalamongmothers in public housing. New York: Foundation for ChildDevelopment, Working Paper.
73. Saegert, Susan, and Gary Winkel. 1980. The home: A critical problem for changing sex roles. In New space for women, eds. Gerda Wekerle, Rebecca Peterson and David Morley. Boulder, CO: Westview.
74. Saegert, Susan, and Gary Winkel. 1999. CDCs, social capital, and housing quality. Shelterforce, March/April, 22-24.
75. Saegert, Susan, and Delores E. McCarthy. 1998.Gender and housing for the elderly: Sorting through the accumulations of a lifetime. InEnvironment and aging theory: A focus on housing, eds. Richard J. Scheidt and Paul G. Windley. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
76. Schill, Michael. 1994. The role of the nonprofit sector in low-income housing production:Acomparative perspective. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30(1):74-101.
77. Schill, Michael H., and Benjamin P. Scafidi. 1997. Housing conditions and problems in New York City: An analysis of the 1996Housing and Vacancy Survey. New York: Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University School of Law, Working Paper 97-7.
78. Simmons, Patrick A. 1997. Housing statistics of the United States: First edition. Lanham, MD: Bernan Press.
79. Spain, Daphne, and Suzanne M. Bianchi. 1996. Balancing act:Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Russell Sage
80. Stockard, James G., Jr. 1998. Public housing-the next sixty years. In New directions in urban public housing, eds. David P.Varady, Wolfgang F. E. Preiser and Francis P. Russell, 237-264. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.
81. Stone, Michael E. 1993. Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia: TempleUniversity Press.
82. Torre, Susana. 1999. Expanding the urban design agenda: A critique of the new urbanism. In Design and feminism: Re-visioning spaces, places, and everyday things, ed. Joan Rothschild, 35-44. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
83. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1996. United States Census, Bureau of the Census. 2000.United States Census, Bureau of the Census.
84. U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2001. American Housing Survey for the United States in 2001.
85. Wekerle, Gerda R. 1988. Canadian women's housing cooperatives: Case studies in physical and social innovation. In Lifespaces: Gender, household, employment, eds. Caroline Andrew and Beth Moore Milroy, 102-140. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
86. Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87. Wright, Gwendolyn. 1983. Building the dream: A social history of housing in America. New York: Pantheon.