Measuring evolutionary isolation for conservation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Redding, David W ^a,b   Mazel, Florent ^c   Mooers, Arne Ø ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; METRIC SYSTEM; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES CONSERVATION; THEORY VALIDATION; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

RAPTORES;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENDANGERED SPECIES; LINEAR MODELS; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

EID: 84916897069     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113490     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Waldron A, Mooers AO, Miller DC, Nibbelink N, Redding DW, et al. (2013) Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S Adoi: 10 1073/ pnas 1221370110.
2. Metrick A, Weitzman ML (1996) Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Economics 72: 1.
3. Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellin RA, Master LL, et al. (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 503-507.
4. Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect?-Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235-254.
5. Crozier RH (1992) Genetic diversity and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 61: 11-15.
6. Fay JJ, Thomas WL (1983) Endangered species listing and recovery priority guidelines. US Federal Register 48: 43098-43105.
7. Pavoine S, Ollier A, Dufour AB (2005) Is the originality of a species measurable? Ecology Letters 8: 579-586.
8. Redding DW (2003) Incorporating Genetic Distinctness and Reserve Occupancy into a Conservation Prioritisation Approach. Masters Thesis. University Of East Anglia, Norwich UK.
9. Isaac NJB, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JEM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS One 2: e29.
10. Buisson L, Grenouillet G, Villeger S, Canal J, Laffaille P (2013) Towards a loss of functional diversity in stream fish assemblages under climate change. Global Change Biology 19: 387-400.
11. Altschul SF, Lipman DJ (1990) Equal Animals. Nature 348: 493-494.
12. Haake CJ, Kashiwada A, Su FE (2008) The shapley value of phylogenetic trees. Journal of Mathematical Biology 56: 479-497.
13. Redding DW, Mooers AO (2006) Incorporating Evolutionary Measures into Conservation Prioritization. Conservation Biology 20: 1970-1978.
14. May RM (1990) Taxonomy as Destiny. Nature 347: 129-130.
15. Nixon KC, Wheeler QD (1992) Measures of Phylogenetic Diversity In: Novacek MJ, Wheeler QD (Eds) Extinction And Phylogeny New York: Columbia University Press, 216-234.
16. Ricotta C (2007) A semantic taxonomy for diversity measures. Acta Bio. 55: 23-33.
17. Huang J, Mi X, Ma K (2011) A genome evolution-based framework for measures of originality for clades. Journal of Theoretical Biology 276: 99-105.
18. Revell LJ (2012) phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecology Evol 3: 217-223.
19. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2013) cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version 1.14.4.
20. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20: 289-290.
21. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available: http://www R-project org/. Accessed 2013 Dec 1.
22. Fritz SA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Purvis A (2009) Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecology Letters 12: 538-549.
23. Isaac NJB, Redding DW, Meredith HM, Safi K (2012) Phylogenetically-informed priorities for amphibian conservation. PLoS One 7: e43912.
24. Red List of Endangered Species (2012) IUCN (World Union for Conservation). Available: www.redlist. org. Accessed 01 December 2013.
25. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference 3rd Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. AmphibiaWeb (2013) Information on amphibian biology and conservation. Available: http:// amphibiaweb.org/. Accessed 2013 Dec 1.
27. Faith DP (2008) Threatened Species and the Potential Loss of Phylogenetic Diversity: Conservation Scenarios Based on Estimated Extinction Probabilities and Phylogenetic Risk Analysis. Conservation Biology 22: 1461-1470.
28. Hartmann K (2013) The equivalence of two phylogenetic biodiversity measures: the Shapley value and Fair Proportion index, Journal of Mathematical Biology 67: 1163-70.
29. Volkmann L, Martyn I, Moulton V, Spillner A, Mooers AO (2014) Prioritizing populations for conservation using indices of genetic isolation PLoS One 9: e88945.
30. Legendre P, De Cáceres M (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecology Letters 16: 951-963.
31. Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61: 1-10.
32. Diniz-Filho JAF, Loyola RD, Raia P, Mooers AO, Bini LM (2013) Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28: 689-695.
33. Cadotte MW, Davies TJ (2010) Rarest of the rare: advances in combining evolutionary distinctiveness and scarcity to inform conservation at biogeographical scales. Diversity and Distributions, 16(3): 376-385.
34. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Redding DW, Hartmann K, et al. (2014) Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Current Biology 24: 1-12.
35. Rosauer D, Laffan SW, Crisp MD, Donnellan SC, Cook LG (2009) Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. Molecular Ecology 18: 406-4072.
36. Redding DW, Hartmann K, Mimoto A, Bokal D, DeVos M, et al. (2008) Evolutionarily distinctive species often capture more phylogenetic diversity than expected. Journal of Theoretical Biology 251: 606-615.