Assessment of co-control effects for air pollutants and green house gases in urban transport: A case study in Urumqi

Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2985-2992

  Gao, Yu Bing ^a   Mao, Xian Qiang ^a   Gabriel, Corsetti ^a   Wei, Yi ^b  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Environmental Pollution Control Center of Urumqi   (China)

Author keywords

Co control; Urban transport; Urumqi

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; APPLICATION PROGRAMS; AUTOMOBILES; COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COST REDUCTION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; EMISSION CONTROL; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT; NATURAL GAS VEHICLES; PASSENGER CARS; RAPID TRANSIT;

BUS RAPID TRANSIT; CO CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES; EMISSION REDUCTION; GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTIONS; URBAN TRANSPORT; URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; URUMQI;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 84916879105     PISSN: 10006923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. IPCC. Climate Change 2001 [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
2. Mckinley Galen, Zuk Miriam, Höjer Morten, et al. Quantification of local and global benefits from air pollution control in Mexico City [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005, 39(7): 1954-1961.
3. 2emission reduction in a developing country [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38: 2586-2597.
4. Eto R, Murata A, Uchiyama Y, et al. Co-benefits of including CCS projects in the CDM in India' power sector [J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 58: 260-268.
5. 2 in the Chinese iron and steel industry [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47(21): 12002-12010.
6. 2 from the Chinese coal-fired power industry [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 67: 220-227.
7. Beevers Sean D, Carslaw David C. The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(1): 1-5.
8. Thambiran Tirusha, Diab Roseanne D. Air pollution and climate change co-benefit opportunities in the road transportation sector in Durban, South Africa [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45: 2683-2689.
9. 2emission reduction and the co-benefits of local air pollution abatement in the transportation sector of China [J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2012, 21: 1-13.
10. [EB/OL]. http://www.ylxw.com.cn/news/content/2011-01/18/content_59214.htm. 2011-01-18.
11. Tollefsen P, Rypdal K, Torvanger A, et al. Air pollution policies in Europe: Efficiency gains from integrating climate effects with damage costs to health and crops [J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2009, 12(7): 870-881.
12. IPCC. Climate Change 2007 (AR4) [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
13. IPCC. Climate Change 1995(SAR) [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
14. [EB/OL]. http://wfs.mep.gov.cn/dq/jdc/zh/, 2012-12-31.
15. [EB/OL]. http://www.sdjtjt.com/shownews.asp?id=1380, 2013-06-27.
16. International Energy Agency. The contribution of natural gas vehicles to sustainable transport [R]. Paris: IEA, 2010.
17. Jahirul M I, Masjuki H H, Saidur R, et al. Comparative engine performance and emission analysis of CNG and gasoline in a retrofitted car engine [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, (30): 2219-2226.
18. Luz Dondero, José Goldemberg. Environmental implication of converting light gas vehicles: the Brazilian experience [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(13): 1703-1708.
19. WHO. Air quality guidelines for Europe(second edition) [R]. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2000.