|
Volumn 96, Issue 23, 2014, Pages e193-
|
Variations in data collection methods between national databases affect study results: A comparison of the nationwide inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program databases for lumbar spine fusion procedures
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
COMORBIDITY;
DATA BASE;
DATA COLLECTION METHOD;
DEMOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HOSPITAL PATIENT;
HUMAN;
LUMBAR SPINE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MORBID OBESITY;
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RISK FACTOR;
SEPSIS;
SPINE FUSION;
SURGICAL INFECTION;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
URINARY TRACT INFECTION;
WOUND DEHISCENCE;
ADOLESCENT;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EVALUATION STUDY;
FACTUAL DATABASE;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
LUMBAR VERTEBRA;
MIDDLE AGED;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PROCEDURES;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SURGERY;
UNITED STATES;
YOUNG ADULT;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
COHORT STUDIES;
COMORBIDITY;
DATA COLLECTION;
DATABASES, FACTUAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LUMBAR VERTEBRAE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SPINAL FUSION;
UNITED STATES;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 84916877415
PISSN: 00219355
EISSN: 15351386
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01490 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (185)
|
References (12)
|