Predicting coronary heart disease events in women: A longitudinal cohort study

Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 482-492

  McSweeney, Jean ^a   Cleves, Mario A ^b   Fischer, Ellen P ^c,d   Moser, Debra K ^e   Wei, Jeanne ^a   Pettey, Christina ^a   Rojo, Martha O ^a   Armbya, Narain ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Coronary disease; Myocardial infarction; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COMPLICATION; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRODROMAL SYMPTOM; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STENT; TIME;

ADULT; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRODROMAL SYMPTOMS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84916877010     PISSN: 08894655     EISSN: 15505049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182a409cc     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wenger NK. Women and coronary heart disease: A century after Herrick: understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Circulation. 2012;126(5):604Y611.
2. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update. Circulation. 2012;125: e12-e230.
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Comparative effectiveness review: noninvasive technologies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/202/1132/CER58-Diagnosis-CAD-in-Women-ExecutiveSummary-20120607.pdf. Published June 7, 2012. Accessed June 23, 2012.
4. Romeo K. The female heart: physiological aspects of cardiovascular disease inwomen. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1995; 14(4):170-177.
5. Canto JG, Shlipak MG, Rogers WJ, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients withmyocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA. 2000; 283(24):3223-3229.
6. Canto JG, Rogers WJ, Chandra NC. Differences in men and women in heart attack treatments and outcomes are not explained by insurance status [abstract]. AHRQ Research Activities. 2002;263:3Y4. http://www.ahrq.gov. Accessed July 7, 2003.
7. Canto JG, Goldberg RJ, Hand MM, et al. Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes: myth vs reality. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(22):2405-2413.
8. D'Agostino RB Sr, Pencina MJ. Invited commentary: clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(3):187-189.
9. Cook NR, Paynter NP, Eaton CB, et al. Comparison of the Framingham and Reynolds Risk Scores for Global Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in theMultiethnicWomen'sHealth Initiative. Circulation. 2012;125(14):1748-1756.
10. McSweeney JC, CodyM, O'Sullivan P, Elberson K, MoserDK, Garvin BJ. Women's early warning symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;108(21):2619-2623.
11. Graham MM, Westerhout CM, Kaul P, Norris CM, Armstrong PW. Sex differences in patients seeking medical attention for prodromal symptoms before an acute coronary event. Am Heart J. 2008;156(6):1210-1216.
12. McSweeney JC, Cleves MA, Zhao W, Lefler LL, Yang S. Cluster analysis of women's prodromal and acute myocardial infarction symptoms by race and other characteristics. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;25(4):311-322.
13. McSweeney JC, O'Sullivan P, Cleves MA, et al. Racial differences in women's prodromal and acute symptoms of myocardial infarction. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(1): 63-73.
14. McSweeney JC, O'Sullivan P, Cody M, Crane PB. Development of the McSweeney Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction SymptomSurvey. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(1): 58-67.
15. McSweeney JCM, Fischer E, Rojo MAN, Moser D. Reliability of theMcSweeney Acute and ProdromalMyocardial Infarction Symptom Survey among black and white women [published online ahead of print October 8, 2012]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. doi:10.1177/1474515112459989.
16. Ball LJ, Bisher GB, Birge SJ. A simple test of central processing speed: An extension of the Short Blessed Test. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(11):1359-1363.
17. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, Peck A, Schechter R, Schimmel H. Validation of a short orientation-memory-concentration test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140(6): 734-739.
18. Wilkins CH, Wilkins KL, Meisel M, Depke M, Williams J, Edwards DF. Dementia undiagnosed in poor older adults with functional impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(11): 1771-1776.
19. Shtatland ES, Kleinman K, Cain EM. A new strategy of model building in PROC LOGISTIC with automatic variable selection, validation, shrinkage, and model averaging. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2008:191-229.
20. Shtatland ES, Kleinman K, Cain EM. Model building in proc phreg with automatic variable selection and information criteria. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2005:1-10.
21. Harrell FE, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluation the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247(18): 2543-2546.
22. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med. 2004;23(13):2109-2123.
23. STATA [computer program]. Version 12.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2012.
24. SAS [computer program]. Version 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2012.
25. Michos ED, Blumenthal RS. How accurate are 3 risk prediction models in US women? Circulation. 2012;125(14): 1723-1726.
26. D'Agostino RB Sr, Ramachandran S, Vasan RS, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117(6): 743-753.
27. Tzoulaki I. Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score. JAMA. 2009;302(21): 2345-2352.
28. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N, Cook NR. Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: The Reynolds Risk Score. JAMA. 2007;297(6):611-619.
29. Arant CB, Wessel TR, Ridker PM, et al. Multimarker approach predicts adverse cardiovascular events in women evaluated for suspected ischemia: results from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsoredWomen's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Clin Cardiol. 2009;32(5):244-250.
30. Pelter MM, Riegel B, McKinley S, et al. Are there symptom differences in patients with coronary artery disease presenting to the emergency department ultimately diagnosed with or without acute coronary syndrome?Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30(9):1822-1828.
31. Meisel ZF, Armstrong K, Mechem CC, et al. Influence of sex on the out-of-hospital management of chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):80-87.
32. Wenger NK. Cardiovascular disease: The female heart is vulnerable. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(3):134-135.
33. Hayes SN, Wenger NK, Greenberger P. 10Q Report: Advancing women's heart health through improved research, diagnosis and treatment. Washington, DC: The National Coalition for WomenWith Heart Disease. http://www.womenheart.org/documents/upload/10Q-FINAL-REVISED-6-28-11.pdf. Published June 2011. Accessed January 16, 2012.
34. Grady D. Why is a good clinical prediction rule so hard to find? Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(19):1701-1702.