Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 41-56

  Yepes, Juan F ^a   Al Sabbagh, Mohanad ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); Implant failure assessment; Postimplant assessment

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADVERSE EFFECTS; BONE DENSITY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL SURGERY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; JAW; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; UTILIZATION;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PATIENT CARE PLANNING;

EID: 84916620604     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.09.003     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Fienitz T., Schwarz F., Ritter L., et al. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012, 23(7):882-887.
2. Schulze R.K., Berndt D., d'Hoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21(1):100-107.
3. Wang G., Vannier M.W., Cheng P.C. Iterative X-ray cone-beam tomography for metal artifact reduction and local region reconstruction. Microsc Microanal 1999, 5(1):58-65.
4. Zhang Y., Zhang L., Zhux R., et al. Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 67(3):924-932.
5. Frederiksen N.L. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995, 80(5):540-554.
6. Kim D.G. Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density?. JBone Metab 2014, 21(2):117-126.
7. Reeves T.E., Mah P., McDavid W.D. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012, 41(6):500-508.
8. Taylor T.T., Gans S., Jones E., et al. Comparison of micro-CT and cone beam CT-based assessments for relative difference of grey level distribution in a human mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013, 42(3):25117764.
9. Nomura Y., Watanabe H., Honda E., et al. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21(5):558-562.
10. Hua Y., Nackaerts O., Duyck J., et al. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20(8):767-771.
11. Parsa A., Ibrahim N., Hassan B., et al. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
12. Monje A., Monje F., Gonzalez-Garcia R., et al. Comparison between microcomputed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography radiologic bone to assess atrophic posterior maxilla density and microarchitecture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014, 25(6):723-728.
13. Ludlow J.B., Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008, 106(1):106-114.
14. Hujoel P.P., Bollen A., Noonan C., et al. Antepartum dental radiography and infant low birth weight. JAMA 2004, 291(16):1987-1993.
15. Gonzalez A.J., Mason G., Clarke R., et al. Scope of radiological protection control measures. Ann ICRP 2007, 37(5):1-105.
16. Hermann J.S., Schoolfield J.D., Nummikoski P.V., et al. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001, 16(4):475-485.
17. Albrektsson T., Zarb G., Worthington P., et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986, 1(1):11-25.
18. Albrektsson T., Jansson T., Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 1986, 30(1):151-174.
19. Carlsson L., Rostlund T., Albrektsson B., et al. Osseointegration of titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1986, 57(4):285-289.
20. Buser D., Weber H.P., Bragger U., et al. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, 6(4):405-412.
21. Hansson H.A., Albrektsson T., Branemark P.I. Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. JProsthet Dent 1983, 50(1):108-113.
22. Fransson C., Tomasi C., Pikner S.S., et al. Severity and pattern of peri-implantitis-associated bone loss. JClin Periodontol 2010, 37(5):442-448.
23. Wennstrom J., Palmer R. Consensus report of session 3: clinical trials. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Peridontology 1999, 1-40. Quintessence. N. Lang, T. Karring, J. Lindhe (Eds.).
24. Roos-Jansaker A.M., Renvert H., Lindahl C., et al. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. JClin Periodontol 2006, 33(4):290-295.
25. Colnot C., Romero D.M., Huang S., et al. Molecular analysis of healing at a bone-implant interface. JDent Res 2007, 86(9):862-867.
26. Kobayashi K., Shirmoda S., Nakagawa Y., et al. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004, 19(2):228-231.
27. Lascala C.A., Panella J., Marques M.M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004, 33(5):291-294.
28. Marmulla R., Wortche R., Muhling J., et al. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005, 34(1):28-31.
29. Pinsky H.M., Dyda S., Pinsky R.W., et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006, 35(6):410-416.
30. Ludlow J.B., Laster W.S., See M., et al. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007, 103(4):534-542.
31. Vera C., De kok I.J., Chen W., et al. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012, 27(5):1249-1257.
32. Sirin Y., Horasan S., Yaman D., et al. Detection of crestal radiolucencies around dental implants: an invitro experimental study. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2012, 70(7):1540-1550.
33. Dave M., Davies J., Wilson R., et al. Acomparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013, 24(6):671-678.
34. Mengel R., Kruse B., Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an invitro study on native pig mandibles. JPeriodontol 2006, 77(7):1234-1241.
35. Kalender W.A., Hebel R., Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987, 164(2):576-577.
36. Haramati N., Staron R.B., Mazel-Sperling K., et al. CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994, 18(6):429-434.