Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher)

Korean Journal of Urology

Volumn 55, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 808-813

  Jang, Hyeon Jun ^a   Song, Wan ^a   Suh, Yoon Seok ^a   Seok Jeong, U Seok ^a   Jeon, Hwang Gyun ^a   Jeong, Byong Chang ^a   Jeon, Seong Soo ^a   Lee, Hyun Moo ^a   Choi, Han Yong ^a   Seo, Seong Il ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RENAL NEPHROMETRY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84916599982     PISSN: 20056737     EISSN: 20056745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.808     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Long JA, Yakoubi R, Lee B, Guillotreau J, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2012;61:1257-62.
2. Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS, Pantuck AJ, Kim HL, Ficarra V, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 2004;171(6 Pt 1):2181-5.
3. Barlow LJ, Korets R, Laudano M, Benson M, McKiernan J. Predicting renal functional outcomes after surgery for renal cortical tumours: a multifactorial analysis. BJU Int 2010;106:489-92.
4. Weight CJ, Larson BT, Fergany AF, Gao T, Lane BR, Campbell SC, et al. Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol 2010;183:1317-23.
5. Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, Antebi E, et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer 2009;115:1465-71.
6. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007;178:41-6.
7. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 2001;166:6-18.
8. White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, Khanna R, Hernandez AV, Forest S, et al. Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of ≥7. Urology 2011;77:809-13.
9. Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single- surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures. Urology 2009;73:306-10.
10. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009;182:866-72.
11. Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, Bratslavsky G, Menon M, Linehan WM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 2008;180:2353-6.
12. Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Nguyen MM, Desai MM, Gill IS. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre. BJU Int 2008;102:86-92.
13. Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS Jr, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Weizer AZ. A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2012;188:45-50.
14. Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, White MA, Forest S, Autorino R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single- surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010;76:754-8.
15. Antonelli A, Cozzoli A, Nicolai M, Zani D, Zanotelli T, Perucchini L, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of intracapsular renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm. Eur Urol 2008;53:803-9.
16. Becker F, Siemer S, Humke U, Hack M, Ziegler M, Stockle M. Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-term survival data of 216 patients. Eur Urol 2006;49:308-13.
17. Riggs SB, Larochelle JC, Belldegrun AS. Partial nephrectomy: a contemporary review regarding outcomes and different techniques. Cancer J 2008;14:302-7.
18. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296-305.
19. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Fergany A, Frank I, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010;58:340-5.
20. Simmons MN, Fergany AF, Campbell SC. Effect of parenchymal volume preservation on kidney function after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2011;186:405-10.