District energy development in liberalised markets: situating UK heat network development in comparison with Dutch and Norwegian case studies

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1228-1241

  Hawkey, David ^a   Webb, Janette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

energy; market governance; sustainability; urban

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LIBERALIZATION; SUSTAINABILITY;

NETHERLANDS; NORWAY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84916210104     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2014.971001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baas, L. 2008. “Industrial Symbiosis in the Rotterdam Harbour and Industry Complex: Reflections on the Interconnection of the Techno-Sphere with the Social System.” Business Strategy and the Environment 17 (5): 330–340. doi: 10.1002/bse.624
2. Baas, L., and G. Korevaar. 2010. “Eco-industrial Parks in The Netherlands: The Rotterdam Harbor and Industry Complex.” In Sustainable Development in the Process Industries: Cases and Impact, edited by J. Harmsen and J. B. Powell, 59–79. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3. Bulkeley, H., and K. Kern. 2006. “Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK.” Urban Studies 43 (12): 2237–2259. doi: 10.1080/00420980600936491
4. Coutard, O., and J. Rutherford. 2010. “Energy Transition and City–Region Planning: Understanding the Spatial Politics of Systemic Change.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (6): 711–727. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.496284. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.496284
5. Ericson, K. 2009. The Swedish District Heating Systems: Critical Factors and Lessons Learned. Policy Development for Improving RES-H/C Penetration in European Member States. http://www.res-h-policy.eu/downloads/Swedish_district_heating_case-study_D5.
6. Euroheat & Power. 2011. District Heating and Cooling: Country by Country Survey. Brussels: Euroheat & Power.
7. Geels, F. 2010. “Ontologies, Socio-technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-level Perspective.” Research Policy 39 (4): 495–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
8. Grohnheit, P. E., and B. O. Gram Mortensen. 2003. “Competition in the Market for Space Heating. District Heating as the Infrastructure for Competition among Fuels and Technologies.” Energy Policy 31 (9): 817–826. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00066-6
9. Hall, P., and D. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Hawkey, D. J. C. 2012. “District Heating in the UK: A Technological Innovation Systems Analysis.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 5 (1): 19–32. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.005. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.005
11. Hawkey, D. J. C. 2013. District Heating Policy Options in the UK: Workshop Report. District Energy Vanguards Network. http://www.heatandthecity.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/102003/VanguardsNetwork-HeatPolicyOptionsWorkshopReport.pdf.
12. Hawkey, D. J. C. Forthcoming. District Heating in the UK: Prospects for a Third National Programme. Science and Technology Studies.
13. Hodson, Mike, and Simon Marvin. 2012. “Mediating Low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action.” European Planning Studies 20 (3): 421–439. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651804. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651804
14. IEA. 2005. A Comparison of Distributed CHP/DH with Large-Scale CHP/DH.
15. IEA. 2014. Heating Without Global Warming: Market Developments and Policy Considerations for Renewable Heat. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/FeaturedInsight_HeatingWithoutGlobalWarming_FINAL.pdf.
16. Ingham, G. 2011. Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Kelly, S., and M. Pollitt. 2010. “An Assessment of the Present and Future Opportunities for Combined Heat and Power with District Heating in the UK.” Energy Policy 38 (11): 6936–6945. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.010
18. Lange, P., P. P. J. Driessen, A. Sauer, B. Bornemann, and P. Burger. 2013. “Governing Towards Sustainability – Conceptualizing Modes of Governance.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15 (3): 403–425. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.769414. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.769414
19. Lehtonen, M., and S. Nye. 2009. “History of Electricity Network Control and Distributed Generation in the UK and Western Denmark.” Energy Policy 37 (6): 2338–2345. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.026
20. Mikler, J., and N. E. Harrison. 2012. “Varieties of Capitalism and Technological Innovation for Climate Change Mitigation.” New Political Economy 17 (2): 179–208. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2011.552106
21. Mitchell, C. 2008. The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Monstadt, J. 2007. “Urban Governance and the Transition of Energy Systems: Institutional Change and Shifting Energy and Climate Policies in Berlin.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (2): 326–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00725.x
23. Navarro Yáñez, C. J., A. Magnier, and M. A. Ramírez. 2008. “Local Governance as Government-Business Cooperation in Western Democracies: Analysing Local and Intergovernmental Effects by Multi-level Comparison.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (3): 531–547. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00816.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00816.x
24. Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs. 2011. Energy Report. http://www.government.nl/documents-and-publications/reports/2011/11/01/energy-report-2011.html.
25. Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development. 2013. “Local Government in Norway.” http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/krd.
26. Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate. 2009. “Guidance on the Design of a License Application for District Heating.” http://nve.no/Global/Konsesjoner/Fjernvarme/Fjernvarmeveileder2009.pdf.
27. OECD. 2013. Inventory of Estimated Budgetary Support and Tax Expenditures for Fossil Fuels 2013. OECD. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264187610-en.
28. PVW. 2005. “Warmtebedrijf Business Plan: Warm Relationship Between City and Port.” http://www.zuid-holland.nl/bestuur_en_politiek/Vergaderingen%20van/Provinciale_Staten/Statenperiode_2003-2007/2005/12_Oktober_2005/opendocument-sis.htm?llpos=1206007&llvol=-2000.
29. Rutherford, J. 2008. “Unbundling Stockholm: The Networks, Planning and Social Welfare Nexus Beyond the Unitary City.” Geoforum 39 (6): 1871–1883. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.05.002
30. Schreuer, A., H. Rohracher, and P. Späth. 2010. “Transforming the energy system: the role of institutions, interests and ideas.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (6): 649–652. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.496280
31. Scottish Government. 2014. Towards Decarbonising Heat: Maximising the Opportunities for Scotland. Draft Heat Generation Policy Statement for Consultation. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2014/03/2778/downloads.
32. Sellers, J. M., and S.-Y. Kwak. 2011. “State and Society in Local Governance: Lessons from a Multilevel Comparison.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (3): 620–643. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00977.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00977.x
33. Services of the European Commission. 2012. “Non-paper on the Energy Efficiency Directive Presented to the Informal Energy Council.” http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/eed/doc/20120424_energy_council_non_paper_efficiency_en.pdf.
34. Steward, F. 2012. “Transformative Innovation Policy to Meet the Challenge of Climate Change: Sociotechnical Networks Aligned with Consumption and End-Use as New Transition Arenas for a Low-Carbon Society or Green Economy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (4): 331–343. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663959
35. Summerton, J. 1992. District Heating Comes to Town: The Social Shaping of an Energy System. Linköping: Studies in Arts and Science, Linköping University.
36. Sundberg, G., and J. Sjodin. 2003. “Project Financing Consequences on Cogeneration: Industrial Plant and Municipal Utility Co-operation in Sweden.” Energy Policy 31 (6): 491–503. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00074-5
37. UK DECC. 2013. “The Future of Heating: Meeting the Challenge.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/190149/16_04-DECC-The_Future_of_Heating_Accessible-10.pdf.
38. UK Low Carbon Innovation Coordination Group. 2012. Technology Innovation Needs Assessment: Heat Report. http://www.lowcarboninnovation.co.uk/working_together/technology_focus_areas/heat/.
39. Visser, R. 2008. “Transition Management in the Rijnmond: The Effects of the TM Approach on the Implementation of Industrial Waste Heat Projects.: http://www.uu.nl/uupublish/content/Visser_Robin_eindverslag.pdf.
40. Warmtebedrijf. 2010. “Factsheet, November.” http://www.warmtebedrijf.nl/pop/upload/editor/Image/File/20101118%20Factsheet.
41. Wiltshire, R., M. King, J. Webb, and N. Banks. 2013. Research into Barriers to Deployment of District Heating Networks in Suitable Locations. London: UK DECC. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/191542/Barriers_to_deployment_of_district_heating_networks_2204.pdf.
42. Zero Carbon Hub. 2011. Allowable Solutions for Tomorrow's New Homes: Towards a Workable Framework. http://www.zerocarbonhub.org/sites/default/files/resources/reports/Allowable_Solutions_for_Tomorrows_New_Homes_Towards_a_Workable_Framework.pdf.