Nonlinear dynamics of a controlled stirred tank bioreactor with predator-prey relationship

Chemical and Process Engineering - Inzynieria Chemiczna i Procesowa

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 349-360

  Tabis̈, Boleslaw ^a   Skoneczny, Szymon ^a   Stryjewski, Wojciech S ^a  

^a CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Automatic control; Bioreactor; Dynamics; Predator prey; Steady states

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; CONTROL ENGINEERING; DYNAMICS; PROCESS CONTROL; TANKS (CONTAINERS);

DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; INTEGRATING ELEMENT; MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESS; PREDATOR- PREYS; PREDATOR-PREY RELATIONSHIPS; STEADY STATE; STIRRED TANK BIOREACTORS; UNSTABLE STEADY STATE;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 84916209059     PISSN: 02086425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/cpe-2014-0026     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ajbar A., 2001a. Classification of stability behaviour of bioreactors with wall attachment and substrate-inhibited kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 72, 166-176. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0290(20000120)72:2-166::AIDBIT53.0.CO;2-R.
2. Ajbar A., 2001b. On the existence of oscillatory behavior in unstructured models of bioreactors. Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 1991-1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00423-1.
3. Ajbar A., Alhumazi K., 2012. Dynamics of the chemostat. A bifurcation theory approach. CRC Press, London -New York.
4. Alhumazi K., Ajbar.A., 2005. Dynamics of predator-prey interactions in continuous cultures. Eng. Life Sci., 5,139-147. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200420062.
5. Butler G.J., Hsu S.B., Waltman P., 1983. Coexistence of competing predators in chemostat. J. Math. Biol., 17,133-151. DOI: 10.1007/BF00305755.
6. Chi C.T., Howell J.A., Pawlowsky U., 1974. The regions of multiple stable steady states of a biological reactor with wall growth, utilising inhibitory substrates. Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 207-211. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(74)85046-3.
7. Dunn I.J., Heinzle E., Ingham J., Prenosil J.E., 2003. Biological reaction engineering. Dynamic modeling fundamentals with simulation examples. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinhem.
8. El-Owaidy H.M., Moniem A.A., 2003. On food chain in a chemostat with distinct removal rates. Appl. Math. ENotes, 3, 183-191.
9. Li B., Kuang Y., 2000. Simple food chain in a chemostat with disting removal rates. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 242, 75-92. DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6655.
10. Lotka J.A., 1925. Elements of physical biology, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
11. Luyben W.L., 1999. Process modeling, simulation and control for chemical engineers. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York-Toronto.
12. Moghadas S.M., Gumel A.B., 2003. Dynamical and numerical analyses of a food-chain model. Appl. Math. Comp., 142, 35-49. DOI: 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00282-5.
13. Moussa M.S., Hooijmans C.M., Lubberding H.J., Gijzen H.J., Loosdrecht M.C.M., 2005. Modelling nitrification, heterotrophic growth and predation in activated sludge. Water Res., 39, 5080-5098. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.038.
14. Onysko K.A., Robinson C.W., Budman H.M., 2002. Improved modelling of the unsteady-state behavior of an immobilized-cell, fluidized-bed bioreactor for phenol biodegradation. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 80, 239-252. DOI:10.1002/cjce.5450800209.
15. Olivieri G., Russo M. E., Marzocchella A., Salatino P., 2011. Modeling of an aerobic biofilm reactor with doublelimiting substrate kinetics: Bifurcational and dynamical analysis. Biotechnol. Progress, 27, 1599-1613. DOI:10.1002/btpr.690.
16. Pavlou S., 1999. Computing operating diagrams of bioreactors. J. Biotechnol., 71, 7-16. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00011-5.
17. Ratsak C.H., Maarsden K.A., Kooijman S.A.L.M., 1996. Effects of protozoa on carbon mineralization in activated sludge. Water Res., 30, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00096-4.
18. Russo M.E., Maffettone P.I., Marzocchella A., Salatino P., 2008. Bifurcation and dynamical analysis of a continuous biofilm reactor. J. Biotechnol., 135, 295-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.04.003.
19. Scudo F.M., Ziegler J.R., 1978. The golden age of theoretical ecology: 1923-1940. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidenberg, New York.
20. Tabis B., 1996. Investigation of parametric dependency and linear stability of a cascade of stirred tank bioreactors. Inz. Chem. Proc., 17, 279-294 (in Polish).
21. Tabis B., Malik J., 1996. Steady states multiplicity in a cascade of stirred tank bioreactors for phenol degradation. Inz. Chem. Proc., 17, 645-651 (in Polish).
22. Tabis B., Malik J., 1998. Stability characteristics of a biochemical reactor with predator-prey relationship. A substrate inhibition case. Chem. Eng. J., 70, 179-188. DOI: 10.1016/S1385-8947(98)00094-1.
23. Tsuchiya M.M., Drake J.F., Jost J.L., Fredrickson A.G., 1972. Predator-prey interactions of Distyostelium discoideum and Eschierichia coli in continuous culture. J. Bacteriol., 110, 1147-1153.
24. Volterra V., 1926. Variazione e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. Accad.Nazion. Lincei, 2, 31-113.
25. Yang R.D., Humphrey A.E., 1975. Dynamics and steady state studies of phenol biodegradation in pure and mixedcultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 17, 1211-1235. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260170809.
26. Zhu H., Campell S.A., Wolkowicz G.S.K., 2002. Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic functional response. SIAM J. Appl., 63, 636-682. DOI: 10.1137/S0036139901397285.