-
1
-
-
2442692780
-
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles
-
A.-W. Chan, A. Hróbjartsson, M.T. Haahr, P.C. Gøtzsche, and D.G. Altman Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles JAMA J Am Med Assoc 291 2004 2457 2465
-
(2004)
JAMA J Am Med Assoc
, vol.291
, pp. 2457-2465
-
-
Chan, A.-W.1
Hróbjartsson, A.2
Haahr, M.T.3
Gøtzsche, P.C.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
2
-
-
70449633381
-
Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use
-
S.S. Vedula, L. Bero, R.W. Scherer, and K. Dickersin Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use N Engl J Med 361 2009 1963 1971
-
(2009)
N Engl J Med
, vol.361
, pp. 1963-1971
-
-
Vedula, S.S.1
Bero, L.2
Scherer, R.W.3
Dickersin, K.4
-
3
-
-
70349636711
-
Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A cross-sectional analysis
-
J.S. Ross, G.K. Mulvey, E.M. Hines, S.E. Nissen, and H.M. Krumholz Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis Plos Med 6 2009 e1000144
-
(2009)
Plos Med
, vol.6
, pp. 1000144
-
-
Ross, J.S.1
Mulvey, G.K.2
Hines, E.M.3
Nissen, S.E.4
Krumholz, H.M.5
-
4
-
-
0037267022
-
How useful are unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration in meta-analysis?
-
Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center
-
C.H. MacLean, S.C. Morton, J.J. Ofman, E.A. Roth, P.G. Shekelle Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center How useful are unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration in meta-analysis? J Clin Epidemiol 56 2003 44 51
-
(2003)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.56
, pp. 44-51
-
-
Maclean, C.H.1
Morton, S.C.2
Ofman, J.J.3
Roth, E.A.4
Shekelle, P.G.5
-
5
-
-
84883454261
-
US Food and Drug Administration documents can provide unpublished evidence relevant to systematic reviews
-
M.S. McDonagh, K. Peterson, H. Balshem, and M. Helfand US Food and Drug Administration documents can provide unpublished evidence relevant to systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 1071 1081
-
(2013)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.66
, pp. 1071-1081
-
-
McDonagh, M.S.1
Peterson, K.2
Balshem, H.3
Helfand, M.4
-
6
-
-
84858996695
-
Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: Reanalysis of meta-analyses
-
B. Hart, A. Lundh, and L. Bero Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses BMJ 344 2012 d7202
-
(2012)
BMJ
, vol.344
, pp. 7202
-
-
Hart, B.1
Lundh, A.2
Bero, L.3
-
7
-
-
56749166123
-
Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of publication and presentation
-
discussion e217
-
K. Rising, P. Bacchetti, and L. Bero Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation Plos Med 5 2008 e217 discussion e217
-
(2008)
Plos Med
, vol.5
, pp. 217
-
-
Rising, K.1
Bacchetti, P.2
Bero, L.3
-
8
-
-
38349049478
-
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
-
E.H. Turner, A.M. Matthews, E. Linardatos, R.A. Tell, and R. Rosenthal Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy N Engl J Med 358 2008 252 260
-
(2008)
N Engl J Med
, vol.358
, pp. 252-260
-
-
Turner, E.H.1
Matthews, A.M.2
Linardatos, E.3
Tell, R.A.4
Rosenthal, R.5
-
9
-
-
84878739419
-
Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: Cross sectional study
-
J.B. Schroll, L. Bero, and P.C. Gøtzsche Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study BMJ 346 2013 f2231
-
(2013)
BMJ
, vol.346
, pp. 2231
-
-
Schroll, J.B.1
Bero, L.2
Gøtzsche, P.C.3
-
10
-
-
84886558979
-
Strategies for obtaining unpublished drug trial data: A qualitative interview study
-
N. Wolfe, P.C. Gøtzsche, and L. Bero Strategies for obtaining unpublished drug trial data: a qualitative interview study Syst Rev 2 2013 31
-
(2013)
Syst Rev
, vol.2
, pp. 31
-
-
Wolfe, N.1
Gøtzsche, P.C.2
Bero, L.3
-
11
-
-
84888778352
-
How to access and process FDA drug approval packages for use in research
-
E.H. Turner How to access and process FDA drug approval packages for use in research BMJ 347 2013 f5992
-
(2013)
BMJ
, vol.347
, pp. 5992
-
-
Turner, E.H.1
-
12
-
-
84862239891
-
Regulatory review of novel therapeutics - Comparison of three regulatory agencies
-
N.S. Downing, J.A. Aminawung, N.D. Shah, J.B. Braunstein, H.M. Krumholz, and J.S. Ross Regulatory review of novel therapeutics - comparison of three regulatory agencies N Engl J Med 366 2012 2284 2293
-
(2012)
N Engl J Med
, vol.366
, pp. 2284-2293
-
-
Downing, N.S.1
Aminawung, J.A.2
Shah, N.D.3
Braunstein, J.B.4
Krumholz, H.M.5
Ross, J.S.6
-
13
-
-
84893909238
-
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children
-
T. Jefferson, M.A. Jones, P. Doshi, C.B. Del Mar, R. Hama, and M.J. Thompson Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4 2014 CD008965
-
(2014)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.4
, pp. 008965
-
-
Jefferson, T.1
Jones, M.A.2
Doshi, P.3
Del Mar, C.B.4
Hama, R.5
Thompson, M.J.6
-
14
-
-
84886411481
-
Industry and drug regulators disagree on which data should remain confidential
-
N. Hawkes Industry and drug regulators disagree on which data should remain confidential BMJ 347 2013 f5390
-
(2013)
BMJ
, vol.347
, pp. 5390
-
-
Hawkes, N.1
-
16
-
-
84896525622
-
Similarities and differences in the oncology drug approval process between FDA and European Union with emphasis on in vitro companion diagnostics
-
A.M. Senderowicz, and O. Pfaff Similarities and differences in the oncology drug approval process between FDA and European Union with emphasis on in vitro companion diagnostics Clin Cancer Res 20 2014 1445 1452
-
(2014)
Clin Cancer Res
, vol.20
, pp. 1445-1452
-
-
Senderowicz, A.M.1
Pfaff, O.2
-
17
-
-
84905388371
-
How do the EMA and FDA decide which anticancer drugs make it to the market? A comparative qualitative study on decision makers' views
-
G. Tafuri, P. Stolk, F. Trotta, M. Putzeist, H.G. Leufkens, and R.O. Laing How do the EMA and FDA decide which anticancer drugs make it to the market? A comparative qualitative study on decision makers' views Ann Oncol 25 2014 265 269
-
(2014)
Ann Oncol
, vol.25
, pp. 265-269
-
-
Tafuri, G.1
Stolk, P.2
Trotta, F.3
Putzeist, M.4
Leufkens, H.G.5
Laing, R.O.6
-
18
-
-
84890314024
-
Assessment of PRO label claims granted by the FDA as compared to the EMA (2006-2010)
-
C. DeMuro, M. Clark, L. Doward, E. Evans, M. Mordin, and A. Gnanasakthy Assessment of PRO label claims granted by the FDA as compared to the EMA (2006-2010) Value Health 16 2013 1150 1155
-
(2013)
Value Health
, vol.16
, pp. 1150-1155
-
-
Demuro, C.1
Clark, M.2
Doward, L.3
Evans, E.4
Mordin, M.5
Gnanasakthy, A.6
-
19
-
-
84890559508
-
Registering medicines for low-income countries: How suitable are the stringent review procedures of the World Health Organisation, the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency?
-
J.Y. Doua, and J.-P.V. Geertruyden Registering medicines for low-income countries: how suitable are the stringent review procedures of the World Health Organisation, the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency? Trop Med Int Health 19 2014 23 36
-
(2014)
Trop Med Int Health
, vol.19
, pp. 23-36
-
-
Doua, J.Y.1
Geertruyden, J.-P.V.2
-
20
-
-
84875015085
-
Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: An exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports
-
P. Doshi, and T. Jefferson Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports BMJ Open 3 2013 e002496
-
(2013)
BMJ Open
, vol.3
, pp. 002496
-
-
Doshi, P.1
Jefferson, T.2
|