The responsivity principle: Determining the appropriate program and dosage to match risk and needs

Simulation Strategies to Reduce Recidivism: Risk Need Responsivity (RNR) Modeling for the Criminal Justice System

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 143-166

  Crites, Erin L ^a   Taxman, Faye S ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916198348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6188-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. American Association of Community Psychiatrists [AACP]. (2009). LOCUS: Level of care utilization system for psychiatric and addiction services-Adult version 2010. Available from http://www.comm.psych.pitt.edu/find.html
2. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). (2001). ASAM PPC-2R: ASAMpatient placement criteria for the treatment of substance-related disorders. Chevy Chase, MD: ASAM.
3. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Thepsychologyofcriminalconduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Lexis Nexis.
4. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 7-27.
5. Andrews, D., & Dowden, C. (2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of programme integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173-187.
6. Andrews, D., Dowden, C., & Gendreau, P. (1999). Clinically relevant and psychologically informed approaches to reduced re-offending: A meta-analytic study of human service, risk, need, responsivity and other concerns in justice contexts. Ottawa, ON: Carlton University.
7. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 396-404.
8. Ang, R. P., & Hughs, J. N. (2001). Differential benefits of skills training with antisocial youth based on group composition: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Review, 31(2), 164-185.
9. Barber, S. J., & Wright, E. M. (2010). The effects of referral source supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(8), 847-859.
10. Beck, R., & Fernandez, E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of anger: A metaanalysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(1), 63-74.
11. Beckmeyer, J. J. (2006). Non-therapeutic correctional interventions: a meta-analysis ofcorrec-tional academic, vocational, and life skills programs. Department of Sociology/Criminal Justice & Criminology, University of Missouri--Kansas City.
12. Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “Real World” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3-25. doi:10.1177/0093854804270618.
13. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., & Nichols, T D. (2006). Preventing youth violence and delinquency through universal school-based prevention approach. Prevention Science, 7, 403-408.
14. Botvin, G. J., & Wills, T A. (1984). Personal and social skills training: Cognitive-behavioral approaches to substance abuse prevention. In C. S. Bell & R. Battjes (Eds.), Prevention research: Deterring drug abuse among children and adolescents (pp. 8-49). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services (NIDA Research Monograph).
15. Bouffard, W., & MacKenzie, D. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172-204.
16. Dowden, C., Antonowicz, D., & Andrews, D. A. (2003). The effectiveness of relapse prevention with offenders: a meta-analysis. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 47(5), 516-528.
17. Drake, E. K. (2011). “What works" in community supervision: Interim report. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy (Document No. 11-12-1201).
18. Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington state. Victims and Offenders, 4, 170-196.
19. Fletcher, B. W., Lehman, W. E. K., Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Taxman, F. S., & Young, D. W. (2009). Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice substance abuse treatment agencies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103S, S54-S64.
20. Gastfriend, D. R., & McLellan, A. T (1997). Treatment matching: Theoretical basis and practical implications. Alcohol and Other Substance Abuse, 81(4), 945-966.
21. Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J. & Forman, E. M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice, 9, 329-343.
22. Holloway, K. R., Bennett, T. H., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). The effectiveness of drug treatment programs in reducing criminal behavior: A meta-analysis. Psicothema, 16(3), 620-629.
23. Huber D. L., Hall J. A., Vaughn T. (2001). The dose of case management interventions. Lippincott’s Case Management, 6(3), 119-126.
24. Kopta, S. M., Howard, K. I., Lowry, J. L., & Beutler, L. E. (1994). Patterns of symptomatic recovery in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1009-1016.
25. Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127-144.
26. Little, G. L. (2005). Meta analysis of moral reconation therapy recidivism results from probation and parole implementations. Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Review, 14(1/2), 14-16.
27. Lipsey, M. W. (2008). The Arizona Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) for assessing the effectiveness of programs for juvenile probationers: SPEP ratings and relative recidivism reduction for the initial SPEP sample. A Report to the Juvenile Justice Services Division, Administrative Office of the Courts, State of Arizona. Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.
28. Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124-147. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573.
29. Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3(1), 297-320.
30. Lipsey, M. W., & Landenberger, N. A. (2005). In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims, and places. Berlin: Springer.
31. Lipton, D. S., Pearson, F. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. (2008). The Effects of Therapeutic Communities and Milieu Therapy on Recidivism: Meta-analytic Findings from the Correctional Drug Abuse Treatment Effectiveness (CDATE) Study. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment (pp. 39-77). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
32. Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Programs for Criminal Offenders (Campbell Systematic Review). Oslo, Norway: The Campbell Collaboration.
33. Lowenkamp, C. T. (2004). Correctional program integrity and treatment effectiveness: A multisite, program-level analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
34. Mann, R. E. (2009). Sex offender treatment: The case for manualization. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15(2), 121-131.
35. Martin, M. S., Dorken, S. K., Wamboldt, A. D., & Wootten, S. E. (2012). Stopping the revolving door: A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of interventions for criminally involved individuals with major mental disorders. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 1-12. doi:10.1037/h0093963.
36. McGrew, J. H., Bond, G. R., Dietzen, L., & Salyers, M. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 670-678.
37. Mee-Lee, D., Shulman, G. D., Fishman, M., Gastfriend, D. R., & Griffith, J. H. (Eds.). (2001). ASAM patient placement criteria for the treatment of substance-related disorders (ASAM PPC-2R) (Revised 2nd ed.). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine.
38. Mitchell, W., & MacKenzie, D. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 353-375.
39. National Institute of Corrections [NIC]. (2005). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: The principle of effective interventions. Washington, DC: NIC.
40. Padgett, K. G., Bales, W. D., & Blomberg, T. G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology & Public Policy., 5(1), 61-92.
41. Pattavina, A., Tusinski-Mitofsky, K., & Byrne, J.M. (2009). Persuasive technology: Moving beyond restriction to rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 25(1), 4.
42. Pearson, F. S., Lipton, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. S. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 48(3), 476-496.
43. Perry, A., Coulton, S., Glanville, J., Godfrey, C., Lunn, J., McDougall, C., & Neale, Z. (1996). Interventions for drug-using offenders in the courts, secure establishments and the community. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
44. Prendergast, M., Huang, D., & Hser, Y. (2008). Patterns of crime and drug use trajectories in relation to treatment initiation and 5-year outcomes: An application of growth mixture modeling across three data sets. Evaluation Review, 52(1), 59-83.
45. Prendergast, M. L., Podus, D., Chang, E., & Urada, D. (2002). The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67(1), 53-72.
46. Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can Electronic Monitoring Reduce Crime for Moderate to High-Risk Offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 215-237.
47. Simons, A. D., Padesky, C. A., Montemarano, J., Lewis, C. C., Murakami, J., Lamb, K., et al. (2010). Training and dissemination of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in adults: A preliminary examination of therapist competence and client outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(5), 751-756.
48. Simpson, D. D. (1979). The relation of time spent in drug abuse treatment to posttreatment outcome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(11), 1449-1453.
49. Smith, P., Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General Effects and Individual Differences (No. JS42-103/2002). Canada: University of New Brunswick, Saint John.
50. Stanard, R. P. (1999). The effect of training in a strengths model of case management on client outcomes in a community mental health center. Community Mental Health Journal, 55/(2), 169-179.
51. Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. (2000). The importance of systems in improving offender outcomes: New frontiers in treatment integrity. Justice Policy Journal, 2(2), 37-58.
52. Taxman, F. S., Byrne, J., & Thanner, M. (2002). Evaluating the implementation and impact of a seamless system of care for substance abusing offenders-the H/DTA model. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
53. Taxman, F. S., Young, D., Wiersema, B., Mitchell, S., & Rhodes, A. G. (2007). The national criminal justice treatment practices survey: Multilevel survey methods & procedures. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 52, 225-238.
54. Thanner, M. H. & Taxman, F. S. (2003). Responsivity: the value of providing intensive services to high-risk offender. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 131-147.
55. Thornton, C. C., Gottheil, E., Weinstein, S. P., & Kerachsky, R. S. (1998). Patient-treatment matching in substance abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(6), 505-511.
56. Tong, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(1), 3-24.
57. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2009). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 09-4180).
58. Visher, C., Winterfield, L., & Coggeshall, M. (2005). Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(3), 295-316.
59. Wilson, D. B., MacKenzie, D. L., & Mitchell, F. N. (2008). Effects of Correctional Boot Camps on Offending (Campbell Systematic Review). Oslo, Norway: The Campbell Collaboration.
60. Wilson, D. B., Gallagher, C. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Corrections-Based Education, Vocation, and Work Programs for Adult Offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(4), 347-368.