Functioning of cannabis abuse and dependence criteria across two different countries: The United States and the Netherlands

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 242-250

  Delforterie, Monique ^a   Creemers, Hanneke ^a   Agrawal, Arpana ^b   Lynskey, Michael ^c   Jak, Suzanne ^d   Van Der Ende, Jan ^e   Verhulst, Frank ^e   Huizink, Anja ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e SOPHIA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cannabis abuse dependence; DSM IV; Factor analysis; Measurement bias; US vs. the Netherlands

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CANNABIS SMOKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARIJUANA ABUSE; NETHERLANDS; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA ABUSE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NETHERLANDS; PREVALENCE; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84915789138     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: 15322491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2014.952445     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agrawal, A., & Lynskey, M. T. (2007). Does gender contribute toheterogeneity in criteria for cannabis abuse and dependence?Results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol andrelated conditions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88, 300-307.[doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.003]
2. Althoff, R. R., Verhulst, F. C., Rettew, D. C., Hudziak, J. J., & vander Ende, J. (2010). Adult outcomes of childhood dysregulation: A 14-year follow-up study. Journal of the American Academy ofChild & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(11), 1105-1116.
3. Andrews, G., & Peters, L. (1998). The psychometric properties ofthe Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Social Psychiatryand Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 80-88.
4. Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., Werner, C. S., Ligtvoet, R., &Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2012). Measurement bias detectionthrough factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A MultidisciplinaryJournal, 19, 561-579. [doi: 10.1080/10705511.2012.713261]
5. Budney, A. J., Vandrey, R. G., Hughes, J. R., Moore, B. A.,& Bahrenburg, B. (2007). Oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolsuppresses cannabis withdrawal symptoms. Drug and AlcoholDependence, 86, 22-29. [doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.014].
6. Cottler, L. B., Grant, B. F., Blaine, J., Mavreas, V., Pull, C., Hasin,D., . . ., Mager, D. (1997). Concordance of DSM-IV alcoholand drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured byAUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,47, 195-205. [doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(97)00090-2].
7. Gillespie, N. A., Kendler, K. S.,&Neale, M. C. (2011). Psychometricmodeling of cannabis initiation and use and the symptoms ofcannabis abuse, dependence and withdrawal in a sample of maleand female twins. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118, 166-172.[doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.014].
8. Grant, B. F., Harford, T. C., Dawson, D. A., Chou, P. S., &Pickering, R. P. (1995). The alcohol use disorder and associateddisabilities interview schedule (AUDADIS): Reliabilityof alcohol and drug modules in a general population sample.Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 39, 37-44. [doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01134-K].
9. Grant, B. F.,Moore, T. C., Shepard, J., & Kaplan, K. (2003). Sourceand accuracy statement:Wave 1 National Epidemiologic Surveyon Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Bethesda, MD:National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
10. Grant, J. D., Scherrer, J. F., Neuman, R. J., Todorov, A. A., Price, R.K., & Bucholz, K. K. (2006). A comparison of the latent classstructure of cannabis problems among adult men and womenwho have used cannabis repeatedly. Addiction, 101, 1133-1142.
11. Grucza, R. A., Abbacchi, A. M., Przybeck, T. R., & Gfroerer, J. C.(2007). Discrepancies in estimates of prevalence and correlatesof substance use and disorders between two national surveys.Addiction, 102, 623-629.
12. Hartman, C. A., Gelhorn, H., Crowley, T. J., Sakai, J. T.,Stallings, M., Young, S. E., . . . Hopfer, CJ. (2008). Item responsetheory analysis of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependencecriteria in adolescents. Journal of the AmericanAcademy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 165-173. [doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31815cd9f2].
13. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes incovariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus newalternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A MultidisciplinaryJournal, 6, 1-55. [doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118].
14. Jak, S., Oort, F., & Dolan, C. (2010). Measurement bias and multidimensionality;an illustration of bias detection in multidimensionalmeasurement models. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis,94, 129-137.
15. Langenbucher, J. W., Labouvie, E., Martin, C. S., Sanjuan, P. M.,Bavly, L., Kirisci, L., Chung, T. (2004). An application of itemresponse theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteriain DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal psychology, 113, 72-80.
16. Mellenbergh, G. J. (1994). Generalized linear item response theory.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 300-307.
17. Mewton, L., Teesson, M., & Slade, T. (2010). "Youthful epidemic"or diagnostic bias? Differential item functioning ofDSM-IV cannabis use criteria in an Australian general populationsurvey. Addictive Behaviors, 35(5), 408-413. [doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.001].
18. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user's guide. LosAngeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
19. NDM (2007). National Drug Monitor, 2007. Utrecht, NL: NetherlandInstitute of Mental Health and Addiction.
20. NDM (2010). National Drug Monitor 2010. Utrecht, NL: Netherland Institute of Mental Health and Addiction.
21. Piontek, D., Kraus, L., Legleye, S., & Bühringer, G. (2011). Thevalidity of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence criteria inadolescents and the value of additional cannabis use indicators.Addiction, 106, 1137-1145.
22. Reinarman, C., Cohen, P. D. A., & Kaal, H. L. (2004). The limitedrelevance of drug policy: Cannabis in amsterdam and inSan Francisco. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 836-842.[doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.5.836].
23. SAMHSA (2009). Results from the 2008 National Survey on DrugUse and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies,NSDUH Series H-36, 2009; HHS Publication No. SMA 09-4434)
24. Teesson, M., Lynskey, M., Manor, B., & Baillie, A. (2002). Thestructure of cannabis dependence in the community. Drugand Alcohol Dependence, 68, 255-262. [doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00223-5].
25. Verhulst, F. C., Akkerhuis, G. W., & Althaus, M. (1985). Mentalhealth in Dutch children: (I) a cross-cultural comparison. ActaPsychiatrica Scandinavica, 72, 1-108.
26. World Health Organization (1992). Composite international diagnosticinterview.Version 1.1. Geneva: WHO, Division of MentalHealth.
27. Wittchen, H. U. (1994). Reliability and validity studies of theWHOCompositeInternational Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): A criticalreview. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 28, 57-84. [doi:10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1].
28. Wittchen, H. U., Behrendt, S., Höfler, M., Perkonigg, A., Lieb, R.,Bühringer, G., Beesdo, K. (2008). What are the high risk periodsfor incident substance use and transitions to abuse and dependence?Implications for early intervention and prevention.International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 17,S16-S29.