An exploratory study of how sports and recreation industry personnel perceive the barriers and facilitators of physical activity in children with disability

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 24, 2014, Pages 2080-2084

  Shields, Nora ^a,b   Synnot, Anneliese J ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NORTHERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community sports; Content analysis; Physical activity; Recreation industry

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARENT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; RECREATION; REHABILITATION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ARCHITECTURAL ACCESSIBILITY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; DISABLED CHILDREN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARENTS; RECREATION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VICTORIA;

EID: 84914680333     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.892637     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Frey GC, Stanish HI, Temple VA. Physical activity of youth with intellectual disability: review and research agenda. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2008;25:95-117.
2. Rimmer JA, Rowland JL. Physical activity for youth with disabilities: a critical need in an underserved population. Neurorehabil 2008;11:141-8.
3. van der Ploeg HP, van der Beek AJ, van der Woude LH, van Mechelen W. Physical activity for people with a disability: a conceptual model. Sports Med 2004;34:639-49.
4. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
5. De Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kyuhlman P. Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitudes and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Educ Res 1988;3:273-82.
6. Shields N, Synnot A, Barr M. Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2012;46:989-97.
7. Wilkinson PF. Disabled children and integrated play environments. Rec Res Rev 1983;10:20-8.
8. Anderson L, Heyne L. A statewide needs assessment using focus groups: perceived challenges and goals in providing inclusive recreation services in rural communities. J Park Rec Admin 2000; 18:17-37.
9. Rimmer JH, Riley B, Wang E, et al. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am J Prev Med 2004;26:419-25.
10. Schleien S, Germ P, McAvoy L. Inclusive community leisure services: recommended professional practices and barriers. Ther Rec J 1996;30:260-73.
11. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2007.
12. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62:107-15.
13. Cresswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Inc; 2007.
14. Victorian Department of Human Services. Draft Victorian State disability plan (2002-2012). Melbourne, Australia: Industry Workforce and Strategy Division, Victorian Department of Human Services; 2001.
15. Victorian Department of Human Services. Draft Victorian State disability plan (2013-2016). Melbourne, Australia: Industry Workforce and Strategy Division, Victorian Department of Human Services; 2012.
16. Shields N, Taylor N, Bruder N, Angelo T. Influencing physiotherapy student attitudes toward exercise for adolescents with Down syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:360-6.
17. Shields N, Taylor N, Bruder N, Angelo T. Getting fit for practice: an innovative paediatric clinical placement provided physiotherapy students opportunities for skill development. Physiotherapy 2013;99: 159-64.