Pregnancy outcomes of prenatally diagnosed Turner syndrome: A French multicenter retrospective study including a series of 975 cases

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1133-1138

  Gruchy, N ^a   Vialard, F ^b   Blondeel, E ^b   Le Meur, N ^c   Joly Helas G ^d   Chambon, P ^d   Till, M ^e   Herbaut Graux, M ^f   Vigouroux Castera, A ^g   Coussement, A ^h   Lespinasse, J ⁱ   Amblard, F ^j   Jimenez, M ^k   Lebel Roy Camille, L ^l   Carre Pigeon F ^m   Flori, E ⁿ   Mugneret, F ^o   Jaillard, S ^p   Yardin, C ^q   Harbuz, R ^r   Collonge Rame, M ^s   Vago, P ^t   Valduga, M ^u   Leporrier, N ^a   more..

^a CHU CÔTE DE NACRE   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL   (France)

^c ETABLISSEMENT FRANÇAIS DU SANG   (France)

^d ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e CBPE Hôpitaux de Lyon   (France)

^f Laboratoire Biolille   (France)

^g CHU PURPAN   (France)

^h Hôpital de Chambéry ^*  (France)

ⁱ Hôpital de Chambéry   (France)

^j GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF TOURS   (France)

^l Laboratoire de biologie médicale et cytogénétique   (France)

^m REIMS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁿ HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

^o DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^p PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^q LIMOGES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^r POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^s HÔPITAL SAINT JACQUES   (France)

^t UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

^u UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CYTOGENETICS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS; FRANCE; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE; KARYOTYPING; LABORATORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TURNER SYNDROME; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETIC COUNSELING; INDUCED ABORTION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADULT; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TURNER SYNDROME;

EID: 84914176337     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4439     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Turner HH. A syndrome of infantilism, congenital webbed neck and cubitus valgus. Endocrinology 1938;23:566-74.
2. Hook EB. Chromosome abnormalities and spontaneous fetal death following amniocentesis: further data and associations with maternal age. Am J Hum Genet 1983;35(1):110-6.
3. Gunther DF, Eugster E, Zagar AJ, et al. Ascertainment bias in Turner syndrome: new insights from girls who were diagnosed incidentally in prenatal life. Pediatrics 2004;114(3):640-4.
4. Huang B, Thangavelu M, Bhatt S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of 45, X and 45, X mosaicism: the need for thorough cytogenetic and clinical evaluations. Prenat Diagn 2002;22(2):105-10.
5. Brun JL, Gangbo F, Wen ZQ, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and management of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a report on 98 cases. Prenat Diagn 2004;24(3):213-8.
6. Gruchy N, Vialard F, Decamp M, et al. Pregnancy outcome in 188 French cases of prenatally diagnosed Klinefelter syndrome. Hum Reprod 2011;26(9):2570-5.
7. Surerus E, Huggon IC, Allan LD. Turner's syndrome in fetal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22(3):264-7.
8. Baena N, De Vigan C, Cariati E, et al. Turner syndrome: evaluation of prenatal diagnosis in 19 European registries. Am J Med Genet A 2004;129A(1):16-20.
9. Jacobs P, Dalton P, James R, et al. Turner syndrome: a cytogenetic and molecular study. Ann Hum Genet 1997;61(Pt 6):471-83.
10. Jacobs P, Hassold T, Harvey J, et al. The origin of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Prog Clin Biol Res 1989;311:135-51.
11. Hook EB, Warburton D. Turner syndrome revisited: review of new data supports the hypothesis that all viable 45, X cases are cryptic mosaics with a rescue cell line, implying an origin by mitotic loss. Hum Genet 2014;133(4):417-24.
12. Morris JK. Trisomy 21 mosaicism and maternal age. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A(10):2482-4.
13. Alberman E, Mutton D, Morris JK. Cytological and epidemiological findings in trisomies 13, 18, and 21: England and Wales 2004-2009. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A(5):1145-50.
14. Otter M, Schrander-Stumpel CT, Curfs LM. Triple X syndrome: a review of the literature. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;18(3):265-71.
15. Hamamy HA, Dahoun S. Parental decisions following the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormalities. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2004;116:58-62.
16. Nicolaides KH, Snijders RJ, Gosden CM, et al. Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosome abnormalities. Lancet 1992;340(8821):704-7.
17. Mezei G, Papp C, Toth-Pal E, et al. Factors influencing parental decision making in prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:94-101.
18. Mansfield C, Hopfer S, Marteau TM. Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. Prenat Diagn 1999;19(9):808-12.
19. Robinson A, Bender BG, Linden MG. Decisions following the intrauterine diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Am J Med Genet 1989;34(4):552-4.
20. Holmes-Siedle M, Ryynanen M, Lindenbaum RH. Parental decisions regarding termination of pregnancy following prenatal detection of sex chromosome abnormality. Prenat Diagn 1987;7(4):239-44.
21. Sagi M, Meiner V, Reshef N, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy: possible reasons for high rates of pregnancy termination. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:461-5.
22. Christian SM, Pillay R, Mac Dougall A, et al. Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a trend over time. Prenat Diagn 2000;30:1049-56.
23. Marteau TM, Nippert I, Hall S, et al. Decision-making after diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Outcomes of pregnancies diagnosed with Klinefelter syndrome: the possible influence of health professionals. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:562-6.
24. Chaabouni H, Chaabouni M, Maazoul F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome disorders in Tunisian population. Ann Genet 2001;44(2):99-104.
25. Abramsky L, Hall S, Levitan J, et al. What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: interview and questionnaire study. BMJ 2001;322:463-6.
26. Drugan A, Greb A, Johnson MP, et al. Determinants of parental decisions to abort for chromosome abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 1990;10(8):483-90.
27. Yilmaz Z, Sahin FI, Bulakbasi T, et al. Ethical considerations regarding parental decisions for termination following prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormalities. Genet Couns 2008;19(3):345-52.
28. Evans MI, Sobiecki MA, Krivchenia EL, et al. Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis: "what" is still more important than "when". Am J Med Genet 1996;61(4):353-5.
29. Buchanan A, Sachs A, Toler T, et al. NIPT: current utilisation and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling. Prenat Diagn 2014. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4382.