Characterization of proteins in soybean roots under flooding and drought stresses

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 114, Issue , 2015, Pages 161-181

  Oh, MyeongWon ^a,b   Komatsu, Setsuko ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CROP SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Drought stress; Flooding stress; Proteomics; Root; Soybean

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; DROUGHT; FLOODING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT ROOT; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; SEEDLING; SOYBEAN;

DROUGHTS; FLOODS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; PROTEOMICS; SEEDLING; SOYBEANS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84914163044     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Liu K. Food use of whole soybeans. Soybeans: chemistry, production, processing, and utilization 2008, 441-482. American Oil Chemists' Society Press, Urbana. L. Johnson, P.J. White, R. Galloway (Eds.).
2. Easterling D.R., Meehl G.A., Parmesan C., Changnon S.A., Karl T.R., Mearns L.O. Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 2000, 289:2068-2074.
3. Kausar R., Hossain Z., Makino T., Komatsu S. Characterization of ascorbate peroxidase in soybean under flooding and drought stresses. Mol Biol Rep 2012, 39:10573-10579.
4. Ribas-Carbo M., Taylor N.L., Giles L., Busquets S., Finnegan P.M., Day D.A., et al. Effects of water stress on respiration in soybean leaves. Plant Physiol 2005, 139:466-473.
5. Bota J., Medrano H., Flexas J. Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress?. New Phytol 2004, 162:671-681.
6. Silvente S., Sobolev A.P., Lara M. Metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes in response to water stress. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e38554.
7. Alam I., Sharmin S., Kim K.H., Yang J., Choi M., Lee B.H. Proteome analysis of soybean roots subjected to short-term drought stress. Plant Soil 2010, 333:491-505.
8. Mohammadi P.P., Moieni A., Hiraga S., Komatsu S. Organ-specific proteomic analysis of drought-stresses soybean seedlings. J Proteomics 2012, 75:1906-1923.
9. Toorchi M., Yukawa K., Nouri M.Z., Komatsu S. Proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in soybean roots. Peptides 2009, 30:2108-2117.
10. Russell D.A., Wong D.M., Sachs M.M. The anaerobic response of soybean. Plant Physiol 1990, 92:401-407.
11. Armstrong W. Aeration in higher plants. Adv Bot Res 1979, vol. 7:225-332. Academic Press, London. H.W. Woolhouse (Ed.).
12. Komatsu S., Yamamoto R., Nanjo Y., Mikami Y., Yunokawa H., Sakata K. A. Comprehensive analysis of the soybean genes and proteins expressed under flooding stress using transcriptome and proteome techniques. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:4766-4778.
13. Hashiguchi A., Sakata K., Komatsu S. Proteome analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings under flooding stress. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:2058-2069.
14. Nanjo Y., Skultety L., Asraf Y., Komatsu S. Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free technique. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:3989-4002.
15. Vartapetian B.B., Jackson M.B. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann Bot 1997, 79:3-20.
16. Igamberdiev A.U., Baron K., Manach-Little N., Stoimenova M., Hill R.D. The haemoglobin/nitric oxide cycle: involvement in flooding stress and effects on hormone signalling. Ann Bot 2005, 96:557-564.
17. Davies W.J., Wilkinson S., Loveys B. Stomatal control by chemical signalling and the exploitation of this mechanism to increase water use efficiency in agriculture. New Phytol 2002, 153:449-460.
18. Wilkinon S., Davies W.J. ABA-based chemical signaling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant Cell Environ 2002, 25:195-210.
19. Schachtman D.P., Goodger J.Q.D. Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought. Trends Plant Sci 2008, 13:281-287.
20. Komatsu S., Oh M.W., Jang H.Y., Kwon S.J., Ko J.H., Woo S.H., et al. Proteomic analyses of soybean root tips during germination. Protein Pept Lett 2014, 21:1308-1319.
21. Lakshman M., Zhang Z., Mohanty B., Kwon J.Y., Choi H.Y., Nam H.J., et al. Elucidating rice cell metabolism under flooding and drought stresses using flux-based modeling and analysis. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:2140-2150.
22. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72:248-254.
23. Nanjo Y., Skultety L., Uvackova L., Klubicova K., Hajduch M., Komatsu S. Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings. J Proteome Res 2012, 11:372-385.
24. Zhang Y., Wen Z., Washburn M.P., Florens L. Effect of dynamic exclusion duration on spectral count based quantitative proteomics. Anal Chem 2009, 81:6317-6326.
25. Schmutz J., Cannon S.B., Schlueter J., Ma J., Mitros T., Nelson W., et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463:178-183.
26. Usadel B., Nagel A., Thimm O., Redestig H., Blaesing O.E., Palacios-Rofas N., et al. Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of corresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiol 2005, 138:1195-1204.
27. Briesemeister S., Rahnenfuhrer J., Kohlbacher O. YLoc-an interpretable web server for predicting subcellular localization. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W497-W502.
28. Kanehisa M., Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:27-30.
29. Khatoon A., Rehman S., Hiraga S., Makino T., Komatsu S. Organ-specific proteomics analysis for identification of response mechanism in soybean seedlings under flooding stress. J Proteomics 2012, 75:5706-5723.
30. Plaxton W.C. The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1996, 47:185-214.
31. Cramer G.R., van Sluyter S.C., Hopper D.W., Pascovici D., Keighley T., Haynes P.A. Proteomic analysis indicates massive changes in metabolism prior to the inhibition of growth and photosynthesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to water deficit. BMC Plant Biol 2013, 13:49.
32. van Dongen J.T., Gupta K.J., Ramirez-Aguilar S.J., Araujo W.L., Nunes-Nesi A., Fernie A.R. Regulation of respiration in plants: a role for alternative metabolic pathways. J Plant Physiol 2011, 168:1434-1443.
33. Drew M.C., He C.J., Morgan P.W. Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation in roots. Trends Plant Sci 2000, 5:123-127.
34. Bailey-Serres J., Voesenek L.A.C.J. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008, 59:313-339.
35. O'Leary B., Park J., Plaxton W.C. The remarkable diversity of plant PEPC (phosphoenolpyruvate carbosylase): recent insights into the physiological functions and post-translational controls of non-photosynthetic PEPCs. Biochem J 2011, 436:15-34.
36. Tcherkez G., Boex-Fontvieille E., Mahe A., Hodges M. Respiratory carbon fluxes in leaves. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2012, 168:1434-1443.
37. Kidric M., Kos J., Sabotic J. Proteases and their endogenous inhibitors in the plant response to abiotic stress. Bot Serbica 2014, 38:139-158.
38. Reznik B., Lykke-Andersen J. Regulated and quality-control mRNA turnover pathways in eukaryotes. Biochem Soc Trans 2010, 38:1506-1510.
39. Petsch K.A., Mylne J., Botella J.R. Cosuppression of eukaryotic release factor 1-1 in Arabidopsis affects cell elongation and radial cell division. Plant Physiol 2005, 139:115-126.
40. Zhou X., Cooke P., Li L. Eukaryotic release factor 1-2 affects Arabidopsis responses to glucose and phytohormones during germination and early seedling development. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:357-367.
41. Foyer C.H., Noctor G. Redox regulation and photosynthetic organisms: signaling, acclimation, and practical implications. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11:861-905.
42. Diao G., Wang Y., Yang C. Functional characterization of a gluthathione S-transferase gene from Limonim bicolor in response to several abiotic stresses. Afr J Biotechnol 2010, 9:5060-5065.
43. Frova C. The plant glutathione transferase gene family: genomic structure, functions, expression and evolution. Physiol Plant 2003, 119:469-479.
44. Liu D., Liu Y., Rao J., Wang G., Li H., Ge F., et al. Overexpression of the glutathione S-transferase gene from Pyrus pyrifolia fruit improves tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Biol 2013, 47:515-523.
45. Moons A. Regulatory and functional interactions of plant growth regulators and plant glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). Vitam Horm 2005, 72:155-202.
46. Kumutha D., Enhilmathi K., Sairam R.K., Saivastava G.C., Deshmukh P.S., Meena R.C. Waterlogging induced oxidative stress and antioxidant activity in pigeonpea genotypes. Biol Plant 2009, 53:75-84.
47. Gibbs S.M., Greenway H. Review: mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth, survival and anaerobic catabolism. Funct Plant Biol 2003, 30:1-47.
48. Smith A.M., Ap Rees T. Pathways of carbohydrate fermentation in the roots of marsh plants. Planta 1979, 146:327-334.
49. Komatsu S., Sugimoto T., Hoshino T., Nanjo Y., Furukawa K. Identification of flooding stress responsible cascades in root and hypocotyls of soybean using proteome analysis. Amino Acids 2010, 38:729-738.
50. Komatsu S., Thibaut D., Hiraga S., Kato M., Chiba M., Hashiguchi A., et al. Characterization of a novel flooding stress-responsive alcohol dehydrogenase expressed in soybean roots. Plant Mol Biol 2011, 77:309-322.
51. Tougou M., Hashiguchi A., Yukawa K., Nanjo Y., Hiraga S., Nakamura T., et al. Responses to flooding stress in soybean seedlings with the alcohol dehydrogenase transgene. Plant Biotechnol 2012, 29:301-305.
52. Ushimaru T., Maki Y., Sano S., Koshiba K., Asada K., Hideo T. Induction of enzymes involved in the ascorbate-dependent antioxidative system, namely, ascorbate peroxidase, monodehydroascorbate reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase, after exposure to air of rice (Oriza sativa) seedlings germinated under water. Plant Cell Physiol 1997, 38:541-549.
53. Yang H.L., Zhao Y.R., Wang C.L., Yang Z.L., Zeng Q.Y., Lu H. Molecular characterization of a dehydroascorbate reductase from Pinus bungeana. J Integr Plant Biol 2009, 51:993-1001.
54. Hossain M.A., Hasanuzzaman M., Fujita M. Coordinate induction of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase system by exogenous proline and glycinebetain is correlated with salt tolerance in mung been. Front Agric China 2011, 5:1-14.
55. Sanchez-Rodiguez E., Rubio-Wilhelmi M., Cervilla L.M., Blasco B., Rioa J.J., Rosales M.A., et al. Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci 2011, 178:30-40.
56. Wang Z., Xiao Y., Chen W., Tang K., Zhang L. Increased vitamin C content accompanied by an enhanced recycling pathway confers oxidative stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Integr Plant Biol 2010, 52:400-409.
57. Ji K., Wang Y., Sun W., Lou Q., Mei H., Shen S., et al. Drought-responsive mechanisms in rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance during reproductive stage. J Plant Physiol 2012, 169:336-344.
58. Eltayeb A.E., Kawano N., Badawi G., Kaminaka H., Sanekata T., Morishima I., et al. Enhanced tolerance to ozone and drought stresses in transgenic tobacco overexpressing dehydroascorbate reductase in cytosol. Physiol Plant 2006, 127:57-65.
59. Hossain M.A., Mostofa M.G., Fujita M. Heat-shock positively modulates oxidative protection of salt and drought-stressed mustard (Brassica campestris L.) seedlings. J Plant Sci Mol Breed 2013, 2:1.
60. Sun X., Wang F., Cai H., Zhao C., Ji W., Zhu Y. Functional characterization of an Arabidopsis prolyl aminopeptidase AtPAP1 in response to salt and drought stresses. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2013, 114:325-338.
61. Szawlowska U., Grabowska A., Zdunek-Zastocka E., Bielawski W. TsPAP1 encodes a novel plant prolyl aminopeptidase whose expression is induced in response to suboptimal growth conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012, 419:104-109.
62. Khajuria C., Buschman L.L., Chen M.S., Siegfried B.D., Zhu K.Y. Identification of a novle aminopeptidase P-like gene (OnAPP) possibly involved in Bt toxicity and resistance in a major corn pest (Ostrinia nubilalis). PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e23983.
63. Jeong H.J., Shin J.S., Ok S.H. Barley DNA-binding methionine aminopeptidase, which changes the localization from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by low temperature, is involved in freezing tolerance. Plant Sci 2011, 180:53-60.
64. Schroder G., Eichel J., Breinig S., Schroder J. Three differentially expressed S-adenosylmethionine synthetases from Catharanthus roseus: molecular and functional characterization. Plant Mol Biol 1997, 33:211-222.
65. Peleman J., Boerjan W., Engler G., Seurinck J., Botterman J., Alliotte T., et al. Strong cellular preference in the expression of a housekeeping gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encoding S-adenosylmethionine synthetase. Plant Cell 1989, 1:81-93.
66. Peleman J., Saito K., Cottyn B., Engler G., Seurinck J., van Montagu M., et al. Structure and expression analyses of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 1989, 84:359-369.
67. Lindroth A.M., Saarikoski P., Flygh G., Clapham D., Gronroos R., Thelander M., et al. Two S-adenosylmethionine synthetase-encoding genes differentially expressed during adventitious root development in Pinus contorta. Plant Mol Biol 2001, 46:335-346.
68. Fukuda T., Saito A., Wasaki J., Shinano T., Osaki M. Metabolic alterations proposed by proteome in rice roots grown under low P and high Al concentration under pH. Plant Sci 2007, 172:1157-1165.
69. 2 and nitric oxide interactions mediated cold-induced S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in Medicago sativa subsp. falcata that confers cold tolerance through up-regulating polyamine oxidation. Plant Biotechnol J 2014, 12:601-612.
70. Cui S., Huang F., Wang J., Ma X., Cheng Y., Liu J. A proteomic analysis of cold stress responses in rice seedlings. Proteomics 2005, 5:3162-3172.
71. Arimura G., Ozawa R., Nishioka T., Boland W., Koch T., Kuhnemann F., et al. Herbivore-induced voltiles induce the emission of ethylene in neighboring lima bean plants. Plant J 2002, 29:87-98.
72. Witzel K., Weidner A., Surabhi G.K., Borner A., Mock H.P. Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of barley genotypes with contrasting response towards salinity. J Exp Bot 2009, 60:3545-3557.
73. Fan R., Wang H., Wang Y., Yu D. Proteomic analysis of soybean defense response induced by cotton worm (prodenia litura, fabricius) feeding. Proteome Sci 2012, 10:16.
74. Yan S., Tang Z., Su W., Sun W. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 2005, 5:235-344.
75. Cruz R.T., Jordan W.R., Drew M.C. Structural changes and associated reduction of hydraulic conductance in roots of Sorghum bicolor L. following exposure to water deficit. Plant Physiol 1992, 99:203-212.
76. Komatsu S., Kobayashi U., Nishizawa K., Nanjo Y., Furukawa K. Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in soybean cell wall during flooding stress. Amino Acids 2010, 39:1435-1449.
77. Hossain Z., Komatsu S. Potentiality of soybean proteomics in untying the mechanism of flood and drought stress tolerance. Proteomes 2014, 2:107-127.
78. Frolova L., le Goff X., Rasmussen H.H., Cheperegin S., Drugeon G., Kress M., et al. A highly conserved eukaryotic protein family possessing properties of polypeptide chain release factor. Nature 1994, 372:701-703.