메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 57, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1432-1438

Assessment of risk of bias in controlled studies;Bewertung des Risikos für Bias in kontrollierten Studien

Author keywords

Bias; Cochrane collaboration; Quality assessment; Reporting quality; Tool

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); GERMANY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL BIAS; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE);

EID: 84914154417     PISSN: 14369990     EISSN: 14371588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-014-2065-6     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (8)

References (35)
  • 1
    • 0030027092 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK287ktF2itw%3D%3D, PID: 8555924
    • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.312 , Issue.7023 , pp. 71-72
    • Sackett, D.L.1    Rosenberg, W.M.2    Gray, J.A.3    Haynes, R.B.4    Richardson, W.S.5
  • 3
    • 63849227303 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kritisches Lesen wissenschaftlicher Artikel
    • PID: 19562021
    • Du Prel JB, Röhrig B, Blettner M (2009) Kritisches Lesen wissenschaftlicher Artikel. Dtsch Arztebl Int 106(7):100–105
    • (2009) Dtsch Arztebl Int , vol.106 , Issue.7 , pp. 100-105
    • Du Prel, J.B.1    Röhrig, B.2    Blettner, M.3
  • 4
    • 67049115712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Studiendesign in der medizinischen Forschung
    • PID: 19568374
    • Röhrig B, du Prel JB, Blettner M (2009) Studiendesign in der medizinischen Forschung. Dtsch Arztebl Int 106(11):184–189
    • (2009) Dtsch Arztebl Int , vol.106 , Issue.11 , pp. 184-189
    • Röhrig, B.1    du Prel, J.B.2    Blettner, M.3
  • 5
    • 84859001212 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jones DJ (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. Zugegriffen: 20. Nov. 2013
    • Jones DJ (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. http://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/03/risk-bias-assessment-should-be-taught-all-junior-doctors. Zugegriffen: 20. Nov. 2013
  • 6
    • 84914182300 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Zugegriffen: 18. November 2013
    • Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Zugegriffen: 18. November 2013
  • 7
    • 0035822324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
    • PID: 11440947
    • Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323(7303):42–46
    • (2001) BMJ , vol.323 , Issue.7303 , pp. 42-46
    • Jüni, P.1    Altman, D.G.2    Egger, M.3
  • 8
    • 84859001212 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Cochrane Collaborations’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    • Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche P, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaborations’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928
    • (2011) BMJ , vol.d5928 , pp. 343
  • 9
    • 0035977410 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fls1Sltw%3D%3D
    • Unnebrink K, Windeler J (2001) Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. Statist Med 20(24):3931–3946
    • (2001) Statist Med , vol.20 , Issue.24 , pp. 3931-3946
    • Unnebrink, K.1    Windeler, J.2
  • 10
    • 68249114452 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls
    • Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB et al (2009) Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 338:b2393
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.b2393 , pp. 338
    • Sterne, J.A.C.1    White, I.R.2    Carlin, J.B.3
  • 11
    • 84914182299 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Carpenter JR, Kenward, MG (2014) Missing data in clinical trials – a practical guide. Birmingham: National Health Service Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology. Zugegriffen: 20. Mai 2014
    • Carpenter JR, Kenward, MG (2014) Missing data in clinical trials – a practical guide. Birmingham: National Health Service Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology. http://www.missingdata.org.uk. Zugegriffen: 20. Mai 2014
  • 12
    • 84868308325 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials
    • PID: 22945832
    • Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG et al (2012) Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 157:429–438
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.157 , pp. 429-438
    • Savović, J.1    Jones, H.E.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 13
    • 0037160763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Blinding in randomized trials: hiding who got what
    • PID: 11879884
    • Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Blinding in randomized trials: hiding who got what. Lancet 359:696–700
    • (2002) Lancet , vol.359 , pp. 696-700
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Grimes, D.A.2
  • 14
    • 84905827928 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Blood loss and operative duration using monopolar electrosurgery versus ultrasound scissors for surgical preparation during thoracoscopic ventral spondylodesis: results of a randomized, blinded, controlled trial
    • Otto C, Schiffer G, Tjardes T, Kunter H, Eysel P, Paffrath T (2014) Blood loss and operative duration using monopolar electrosurgery versus ultrasound scissors for surgical preparation during thoracoscopic ventral spondylodesis: results of a randomized, blinded, controlled trial. Eur Spine J 23:1783–1790
    • (2014) Eur Spine J , vol.23 , pp. 1783-1790
    • Otto, C.1    Schiffer, G.2    Tjardes, T.3    Kunter, H.4    Eysel, P.5    Paffrath, T.6
  • 15
    • 40949113623 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
    • PID: 18316340
    • Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL et al (2008) Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 336(7644):601–605
    • (2008) BMJ , vol.336 , Issue.7644 , pp. 601-605
    • Wood, L.1    Egger, M.2    Gluud, L.L.3
  • 17
    • 84897368196 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should include funding source as a standard item [editorial]
    • Bero LA (2013) Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should include funding source as a standard item [editorial]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):ED000075
    • (2013) Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):ED000075
    • Bero, L.A.1
  • 18
    • 84897368189 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should not include funding source as a standard item [editorial]
    • Sterne JAC (2013) Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should not include funding source as a standard item [editorial]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):ED000076
    • (2013) Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):ED000076
    • Sterne, J.A.C.1
  • 19
    • 84988924424 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Vergleich von Bewertungsinstrumenten für die Studienqualität von Primär- und Sekundärstudien zur Verwendung für HTA-Berichte im deutschsprachigen Raum, Schriftenreihe Health Technology Assessment, Bd 102
    • DIMDI: Köln
    • Dreier M, Borutta B, Stahmeyer J, Krauth C, Walter U (2010) Vergleich von Bewertungsinstrumenten für die Studienqualität von Primär- und Sekundärstudien zur Verwendung für HTA-Berichte im deutschsprachigen Raum, Schriftenreihe Health Technology Assessment, Bd 102. Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI), Köln
    • (2010) Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information
    • Dreier, M.1    Borutta, B.2    Stahmeyer, J.3    Krauth, C.4    Walter, U.5
  • 20
    • 0032970925 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses
    • Moher D, Cook DJ, Jadad AR et al (1999) Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. Health Technol Assess 3(12):i-iv, 1-98
    • (1999) Health Technol Assess 3(12):i-iv , pp. 1-98
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Jadad, A.R.3
  • 21
    • 0345583669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis
    • PID: 10493204
    • Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 282(11):1054–1060
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.282 , Issue.11 , pp. 1054-1060
    • Jüni, P.1    Witschi, A.2    Bloch, R.3    Egger, M.4
  • 22
    • 0029914622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK28zgvVCmug%3D%3D, PID: 8721797
    • Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12
    • (1996) Control Clin Trials , vol.17 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-12
    • Jadad, A.R.1    Moore, R.A.2    Carroll, D.3
  • 23
    • 21044459830 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On behalf of the Metaquality Study Group. Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study
    • PID: 15817526
    • Moja LP, Telaro E, D’Amico R, Moschetti I, Coe L, Liberati A (2005) On behalf of the Metaquality Study Group. Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. BMJ 330(7499):1053
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.330 , Issue.7499 , pp. 1053
    • Moja, L.P.1    Telaro, E.2    D’Amico, R.3    Moschetti, I.4    Coe, L.5    Liberati, A.6
  • 24
    • 43549092286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
    • PID: 18426565
    • Lundh A, Gøtzsche PC (2008) Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:22. doi:10.1186/1471-288-8-22
    • (2008) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.8 , pp. 22
    • Lundh, A.1    Gøtzsche, P.C.2
  • 25
    • 84886861401 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials included in Cochrane reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge
    • PID: 23728703
    • Hróbjartsson A, Boutron I, Turner L, Altman DG, Moher D (2013) Assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials included in Cochrane reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:ED000058. doi:10.1002/14651858.ED000058
    • (2013) Cochrane Database Syst Rev , vol.4 , pp. ED000058
    • Hróbjartsson, A.1    Boutron, I.2    Turner, L.3    Altman, D.G.4    Moher, D.5
  • 26
    • 79951609482 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte: Eine Anwendung des CONSORT 2010 Statements
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M3nslaktw%3D%3D, PID: 21312152
    • Ziegler A, König IR (2011) Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte: Eine Anwendung des CONSORT 2010 Statements. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 136:e2–8
    • (2011) Dtsch Med Wochenschr , vol.136 , pp. e2-e8
    • Ziegler, A.1    König, I.R.2
  • 27
    • 84873195412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:MR000030
    • Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG et al (2012) Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:MR000030. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2
    • (2012) doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2
    • Turner, L.1    Shamseer, L.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 28
    • 70349784295 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte sind auch für Leser medizinischer Fachartikel hilfreich
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnmvVWqug%3D%3D, PID: 19802771
    • Meerpohl JJ, Blümle A, Antes G, von Elm E (2009) Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte sind auch für Leser medizinischer Fachartikel hilfreich. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 134:2078–2083
    • (2009) Dtsch Med Wochenschr , vol.134 , pp. 2078-2083
    • Meerpohl, J.J.1    Blümle, A.2    Antes, G.3    von Elm, E.4
  • 29
    • 79955926678 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
    • PID: 22021739
    • Da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AW, Egger M (2011) Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open 1:e000048. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2010–000048
    • (2011) BMJ Open , vol.1 , pp. e000048
    • Da Costa, B.R.1    Cevallos, M.2    Altman, D.G.3    Rutjes, A.W.4    Egger, M.5
  • 30
    • 84882896698 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs
    • PID: 22981249
    • Hartling L, Hamm MP, Milne A et al (2013) Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs. J Clin Epidemiol 66(9):973–981
    • (2013) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.66 , Issue.9 , pp. 973-981
    • Hartling, L.1    Hamm, M.P.2    Milne, A.3
  • 31
    • 0034671451 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaption of self-report measures
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jt1Cmug%3D%3D, PID: 11124735
    • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaption of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191
    • (2000) Spine , vol.25 , Issue.24 , pp. 3186-3191
    • Beaton, D.E.1    Bombardier, C.2    Guillemin, F.3    Ferraz, M.B.4
  • 32
    • 43049113533 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • GRADE: an emerging consensus of evidence and strength of recommendations
    • PID: 18436948
    • Guyatt GA, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926
    • (2008) BMJ , vol.336 , Issue.7650 , pp. 924-926
    • Guyatt, G.A.1    Oxman, A.D.2    Vist, G.E.3
  • 33
    • 0032547326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group
    • COI: 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXlslGqsLY%3D, PID: 9718051
    • Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T et al (1998) Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA 280:605–613
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 605-613
    • Hulley, S.1    Grady, D.2    Bush, T.3
  • 34
    • 0037125379 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial
    • COI: 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xltlegs7k%3D, PID: 12117397
    • Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.288 , pp. 321-333
    • Rossouw, J.E.1    Anderson, G.L.2    Prentice, R.L.3
  • 35
    • 84914182293 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Raspe H (2005) Konzept und Methoden der Evidenz-basierten Medizin: Besonderheiten, Stärken, Grenzen, Schwächen und Kritik. Institut für Sozialmedizin. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein. Zugegriffen: 19. April 2014
    • Raspe H (2005) Konzept und Methoden der Evidenz-basierten Medizin: Besonderheiten, Stärken, Grenzen, Schwächen und Kritik. Institut für Sozialmedizin. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein. http://www.ebm-netzwerk.de/site/was-ist-ebm/images/konzepte_ebm_raspe.pdf. Zugegriffen: 19. April 2014


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.