Should patients listen to how doctors frame messages?

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 349, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Gigerenzer, Gerd ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 84914128641     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7091     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Moxey A, O'Connell D, McGettigan P, Henry D. Describing treatment effects to patients. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:948-59.
2. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, 2008.
3. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus 1986;59:S251-78.
4. nd Report of Session 2010-12. Behaviour Change. 2011. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ ldsctech/179/179.pdf.
5. McKenzie CR, Nelson JD. What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychon Bull Rev 2003;10:596-602.
6. Sher S, McKenzie CR. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition 2006;101:467-94.
7. Kühberger A. The framing of decisions: a new look at old problems. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1995;62:230-40.
8. Kühberger A, Tanner C. Risky choice framing: task versions and a comparison of prospect theory and fuzzy-trace theory. J Behav Decis Making 2010;23:314-29.
9. Mandel DR. Gain-loss framing and choice: separating outcome formulations from descriptor formulations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2001;85:56-76.
10. Keren G. Perspectives on framing. Psychology Press, 2011.