Population receptive field estimates of human auditory cortex

NeuroImage

Volumn 105, Issue , 2015, Pages 428-439

  Thomas, Jessica M ^a   Huber, Elizabeth ^a   Stecker, G Christopher ^a,b   Boynton, Geoffrey M ^a   Saenz, Melissa ^c,d   Fine, Ione ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^d EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Population receptive field (pRF); Tonotopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84914124275     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.060     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Binda P., Thomas J.M., Boynton G.M., Fine I. Minimizing biases in estimating the reorganization of human visual areas with BOLD retinotopic mapping. J. Vis. 2013, 13.
2. Boynton G.M., Engel S.A., Glover G.H., Heeger D.J. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. The Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16:4207-4221.
3. Cheung S.W., Bedenbaugh P.H., Nagarajan S.S., Schreiner C.E. Functional organization of squirrel monkey primary auditory cortex: responses to pure tones. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 85:1732-1749.
4. Cochran W.G. The distribution of quadratic forms in a normal system, with applications to the analysis of covariance. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1934, 30:178-191.
5. Da Costa S., van der Zwaag W., Marques J.P., Frackowiak R.S.J., Clarke S., Saenz M. Human primary auditory cortex follows the shape of Heschl's gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:14067-14075.
6. Da Costa S., van der Zwaag W., Miller L.M., Clarke S., Saenz M. Tuning in to sound: frequency-selective attentional filter in human primary auditory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33:1858-1863.
7. Dick F., Tierney A.T., Lutti A., Josephs O., Sereno M.I., Weiskopf N. In vivo functional and myeloarchitectonic mapping of human primary auditory areas. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:16095-16105.
8. Dumoulin S.O., Wandell B.A. Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. NeuroImage 2008, 39:647-660.
9. Duncan R.O., Boynton G.M. Cortical magnification within human primary visual cortex correlates with acuity thresholds. Neuron 2003, 38:659-671.
10. Elbert T., Sterr A., Rockstroh B., Pantev C., Muller M.M., Taub E. Expansion of the tonotopic area in the auditory cortex of the blind. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:9941-9944.
11. Engel S.A., Rumelhart D.E., Wandell B.A., Lee A.T., Glover G.H., Chichilnisky E.J., Shadlen M.N. fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 1994, 369:525.
12. Formisano E., Kim D.S., Di Salle F., van de Moortele P.F., Ugurbil K., Goebel R. Mirror-symmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron 2003, 40:859-869.
13. Haak K.V., Cornelissen F.W., Morland A.B. Population receptive field dynamics in human visual cortex. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e37686.
14. Hackett T.A. Anatomical organization of the auditory cortex. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2008, 19:774-779.
15. Hackett T.A., Stepniewska I., Kaas J.H. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and ipsilateral cortical connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998, 394:475-495.
16. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Elliott M.R., Gurney E.M., Bowtell R.W. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:213-223.
17. Harms M.P., Melcher J.R. Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically-motivated basis set. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003, 20:168-183.
18. Howard M.A., Volkov I.O., Abbas P.J., Damasio H., Ollendieck M.C., Granner M.A. A chronic microelectrode investigation of the tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex. Brain Res. 1996, 724:260-264.
19. Humphries C., Liebenthal E., Binder J.R. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex. NeuroImage 2010, 50:1202-1211.
20. Jaccard P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 1912, 11:37-50.
21. Jäncke L., Gaab N., Wüstenberg T., Scheich H., Heinze H.J. Short-term functional plasticity in the human auditory cortex: an fMRI study. Cogn. Brain Res. 2001, 12:479-485.
22. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999, 22:751-761.
23. Kay K.N., Winawer J., Mezer A., Wandell B.A. Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110:481-494.
24. Kayser C., Petkov C.I., Augath M., Logothetis N.K. Functional imaging reveals visual modulation of specific fields in auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:1824-1835.
25. Kayser C., Petkov C.I., Logothetis N.K. Tuning to sound frequency in auditory field potentials. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:1806-1809.
26. Langers D.R.M., van Dijk P. Mapping the tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex with minimally salient acoustic stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22(9):2024-2038.
27. Langers D.R., Van Dijk P., Backes W.H. Interactions between hemodynamic responses to scanner acoustic noise and auditory stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005, 53:49-60.
28. Langers D.R.M., Krumbholz K., Bowtell R.W., Hall D.A. Neuroimaging paradigms for tonotopic mapping (I): the influence of sound stimulus type. NeuroImage 2014, 100:650-662.
29. Langers D.R.M., Sanchez-Panchuelo R.M., Francis S.T., Krumbholz K., Hall D.A. Neuroimaging paradigms for tonotopic mapping (II): the influence of acquisition protocol. NeuroImage 2014, 100:663-675.
30. Liegeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., Chauvel P. Localization of the primary auditory area in man. Brain 1991, 114(Pt 1A):139-151.
31. Menning H., Roberts L.E., Pantev C. Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training. NeuroReport 2000, 11:817-822.
32. Moerel M., De Martino F., Formisano E. Processing of natural sounds in human auditory cortex: tonotopy, spectral tuning, and relation to voice sensitivity. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:14205-14216.
33. Moerel M., De Martino F., Santoro R., Ugurbil K., Goebel R., Yacoub E., Formisano E. Processing of natural sounds: characterization of multipeak spectral tuning in human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:11888-11898.
34. Muchinsky P.M. The correction for attenuation. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1996, 56:63-75.
35. Naselaris T., Kay K.N., Nishimoto S., Gallant J.L. Encoding and decoding in fMRI. NeuroImage 2011, 56:400-410.
36. Pantev C., Herholz S.C. Plasticity of the human auditory cortex related to musical training. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35:2140-2154.
37. Petkov C.I., Kayser C., Augath M., Logothetis N.K. Functional imaging reveals numerous fields in the monkey auditory cortex. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e215.
38. Pihlaja M., Henriksson L., James A.C., Vanni S. Quantitative multifocal fMRI shows active suppression in human V1. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008, 29:1001-1014.
39. Rademacher J., Morosan P., Schormann T., Schleicher A., Werner C., Freund H.J., Zilles K. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. NeuroImage 2001, 13:669-683.
40. Rauschecker J.P., Tian B., Hauser M. Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. Science 1995, 268:111-114.
41. Recanzone G.H., Schreiner C.E., Sutter M.L., Beitel R.E., Merzenich M.M. Functional organization of spectral receptive fields in the primary auditory cortex of the owl monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999, 415:460-481.
42. Saenz M., Langers D.R. Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 2014, 307:42-52.
43. Seifritz E., Di Salle F., Esposito F., Herdener M., Neuhoff J.G., Scheffler K. Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence. NeuroImage 2006, 29:1013-1022.
44. Soltysik D.A., Peck K.K., White K.D., Crosson B., Briggs R.W. Comparison of hemodynamic response nonlinearity across primary cortical areas. NeuroImage 2004, 22:1117-1127.
45. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 1904, 15:72-101.
46. Striem-Amit E., Hertz U., Amedi A. Extensive cochleotopic mapping of human auditory cortical fields obtained with phase-encoding FMRI. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17832.
47. Talavage T.M., Sereno M.I., Melcher J.R., Ledden P.J., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:1282-1296.
48. Tian B., Rauschecker J.P. Processing of frequency-modulated sounds in the cat's anterior auditory field. J. Neurophysiol. 1994, 71:1959-1975.
49. Triantafyllou C., Hoge R.D., Krueger G., Wiggins C.J., Potthast A., Wiggins G.C., Wald L.L. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. NeuroImage 2005, 26:243-250.
50. Zenger-Landolt B., Heeger D.J. Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:6884-6893.
51. Zuiderbaan W., Harvey B.M., Dumoulin S.O. Modeling center-surround configurations in population receptive fields using fMRI. J. Vis. 2012, 12:10.