Web-based Citation Management Tools: Comparing the Accuracy of Their Electronic Journal Citations

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 552-557

  Homol, Lindley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliographic management; Citation generators; EBSCO Discovery Service; EndNote Basic; RefWorks; Zotero

Indexed keywords

EID: 84913597299     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Psychological Association Publication manual of the American Psychological Association 2010, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
2. Brahmi F.A., Gall C. EndNote and Reference Manager citation formats compared to "instructions to authors" in top medical journals. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2006, 25(2):49-57. 10.1300/J115v25n02_04.
3. Dahlstrom E. ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2012 (research report) Retrieved from. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS1208/ERS1208.pdf.
4. Dahlstrom E., Walker J.D., Dziuban C. ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2013 (research report) Retrieved from. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS1302/ERS1302.pdf.
5. Emanuel J. Users and citation management tools: Use and support. Reference Services Review 2013, 41(4):639-659. 10.1108/RSR-02-2013-0007.
6. Gilmour R., Cobus-Kuo L. Reference management software: A comparative analysis of four products. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2011, 66. 10.5062/F4Z60KZF.
7. Head A.J., Eisenberg M.B. Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age. Retrieved from University of Washington Project Information Literacy website 2010, (http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_fall2010_survey_fullreport1.pdf).
8. Hensley M.K. Citation management software: Features and futures. Reference and User Services Quarterly 2011, 50(3):204-208. (Retrieved from http://rusa.metapress.com/home/main.mpx).
9. Kessler J., Van Ullen M.K. Citation generators: Generating bibliographies for the next generation. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005, 31(4):310-316. (Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-academic-librarianship/).
10. Martin J.L. Course instructor perceptions of computer-generated bibliographic citations. Reference Services Review 2009, 37(3):304-312. 10.1108/00907320910982794.
11. Miller R. The almost experts: Capstone students and the research process. 2013, April, Association of College and Research Libraries, Indianapolis, IN.
12. Modern Language Association of America MLA handbook for writers of research papers 2009, Modern Language Association of America, New York, NY.
13. Ovadia S. Managing citations with cost-free tools. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 2011, 30:107-111. 10.1080/01639269.2011.565408.
14. Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. About 2014, Retrieved from https://www.zotero.org/about/.
15. Salem J., Fehrmann P. Bibliographic management software: A focus group study of the preferences and practices of undergraduate students. Public Services Quarterly 2013, 9(2):110-120. 10.1080/15228959.2013.785878.
16. Thomson Reuters EndNote Retrieved from. http://endnote.com/basic.