Genomic selection for the improvement of antibody response to newcastle disease and avian influenza virus in chickens

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Liu, Tianfei ^a,b,c,d   Qu, Hao ^b,d   Luo, Chenglong ^b,d   Li, Xuewei ^a   Shu, Dingming ^b,d   Lund, Mogens Sø ^c   Su, Guosheng ^c  

^a SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL SCIENCE   (China)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFLUENZA VACCINE; NEWCASTLE DISEASE VACCINE;

ACCURACY; ANTIBODY RESPONSE; ARTICLE; AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; CROSS VALIDATION RANDOM FAMILY SAMPLING; CROSS VALIDATION RANDOM INDIVIDUAL SAMPLING; ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOMIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; MULTIPLE TRAIT GENOMIC BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION MODEL; MULTIPLE TRAIT PEDIGREE BASED BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION MODEL; NEWCASTLE DISEASE PARAMYXOVIRUS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETIC PARAMETERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SINGLE TRAIT GENOMIC BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION MODEL; SINGLE TRAIT PEDIGREE BASED BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION MODEL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VACCINATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; AVIAN INFLUENZA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; IMMUNOLOGY; INFLUENZA VIRUS A; NEWCASTLE DISEASE; NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; VIROLOGY;

AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS; GALLUS GALLUS;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODY FORMATION; CHICKENS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC VARIATION; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; INFLUENZA A VIRUS; INFLUENZA IN BIRDS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEWCASTLE DISEASE; NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84913595028     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112685     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alexander DJ (1995) The epidemiology and control of avian influenza and Newcastle disease. Journal of Comparative Pathology 112: 105-126.
2. Ababneh MMK, Dalab AE, Alsaad SR, Al-Zghoul MB, Al-Natour MQ (2012) Molecular characterization of a recent Newcastle disease virus outbreak in Jordan. Research in Veterinary Science 93: 1512-1514.
3. Sartore S, Bonfanti L, Lorenzetto M, Cecchinato M, Marangon S (2010) The effects of control measures on the economic burden associated with epidemics of avian influenza in Italy. Poult Sci 89: 1115-1121.
4. Capua I, Alexander DJ (2009) Avian influenza infection in birds: a challenge and opportunity for the poultry veterinarian. Poult Sci 88: 842-846.
5. Alexander DJ (2001) Newcastle disease. British Poultry Science 42: 5-22.
6. Gross W, Siegel P, Hall R, Domermuth C, DuBoise R (1980) Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 2. Resistance to infectious diseases. Poult Sci 59: 205-210.
7. Jaworek B (1978) Effects of selection to resistance on newcastle disease in japanese quail. Genetics Selection Evolution 10: 1-1.
8. Pinard MH, van Arendonk JA, Nieuwland MG, van der Zijpp AJ (1992) Divergent selection for immune responsiveness in chickens: estimation of realized heritability with an animal model. Journal of Animal Science 70: 2986-2993.
9. S. Gavora J, Lloyd Spencer J (1983) Breeding for immune responsiveness and disease resistance. Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Genetics 14: 159-180.
10. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
11. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
12. Gao H, Su G, Janss L, Zhang Y, Lund MS (2013) Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 4678-4687.
13. Meuwissen THE (2009) Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genetics Selection Evolution 41: 35.
14. Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Gregersen VR, Lund MS (2010) Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 1175-1183.
15. Lund M, Sahana G, de Koning D-J, Su G, Carlborg O (2009) Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XII common dataset. I: Genomic selection. BMC Proceedings 3: S1.
16. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009) Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 433-443.
17. Ostersen T, Christensen O, Henryon M, Nielsen B, Su G, et al. (2011) Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution 43: 38.
18. Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M (2013) Accelerating Improvement of Livestock with Genomic Selection. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 1: 221-237.
19. Biscarini F, Bovenhuis H, Van Arendonk JAM, Parmentier HK, Jungerius AP, et al. (2010) Across-line SNP association study of innate and adaptive immune response in laying hens. Animal Genetics 41: 26-38.
20. Luo C, Qu H, Ma J, Wang J, Li C, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association study of antibody response to Newcastle disease virus in chicken. BMC Genetics 14: 42.
21. Grimm D, Staeheli P, Hufbauer M, Koerner I, Marti7acute;nez-Sobrido L, et al. (2007) Replication fitness determines high virulence of influenza A virus in mice carrying functional Mx1 resistance gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 6806-6811.
22. Wang Y, Brahmakshatriya V, Lupiani B, Reddy S, Okimoto R, et al. (2012) Associations of chicken Mx1 polymorphism with antiviral responses in avian influenza virus infected embryos and broilers. Poultry Science 91: 3019-3024.
23. Sironi L, Williams JL, Stella A, Minozzi G, Moreno A, et al. (2011) Genomic study of the response of chicken to highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. BMC Proc 5 Suppl 4: S25.
24. Guo G, Zhao F, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du L, et al. (2014) Comparison of singletrait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models. BMC Genetics 15: 30.
25. Jia Y, Jannink J-L (2012) Multiple Trait Genomic Selection Methods Increase Genetic Value Prediction Accuracy. Genetics 192: 1513-1522.
26. Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Lawlor TJ (2011) Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 4198-4204.
27. Sheng Z, Pettersson M, Hu X, Luo C, Qu H, et al. (2013) Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous x commercial broiler chicken cross. BMC Genomics 14: 151.
28. Box GE, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26: 211-252.
29. Groenen M, Megens H-J, Zare Y, Warren W, Hillier L, et al. (2011) The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken. BMC Genomics 12: 274.
30. Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
31. VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 91: 4414-4423.
32. Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Cullis BR (1995) Average Information REML: An Efficient Algorithm for Variance Parameter Estimation in Linear Mixed Models. Biometrics 51: 1440-1450.
33. th World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod, Leipzing, Germany: ID732.
34. Moyer SE, Collins WM, Skoglund WC (1962) Heritability of Body Weight at Three Ages in Cross-bred Broiler Chickens Resulting from Two Systems of Breeding. Poultry Science 41: 1374-1382.
35. Wilso LL, Stout JM, Ziegler JH, Simpson MJ, Varela-alvarez H, et al. (1971) Heritability of Live and Carcass Characters in a Crossbred Beef Herd. Journal of Heredity 62: 123-125.
36. Sánchez JP, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Bertrand JK (2008) Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models. Journal of Animal Science 86: 267-277.
37. Newman S, Reverter A, Johnston DJ (2002) Purebred-crossbred performance and genetic evaluation of postweaning growth and carcass traits in Bos indicus6 Bos taurus crosses in Australia. Journal of Animal Science 80: 1801-1808.
38. Wei M, van der Werf JH (1995) Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits. Journal of Animal Science 73: 2220-2226.
39. Bacon LD, Hunt HD, Cheng HH (2000) A Review of the Development of Chicken Lines to Resolve Genes Determining Resistance to Diseases. Poultry Science 79: 1082-1093.
40. Gavora JS, Grunder AA, Spencer JL, Gowe RS, Robertson A, et al. (1974) An Assessment of Effects of Vaccination on Genetic Resistance to Marek's Disease. Poultry Science 53: 889-897.
41. Sacco RE, Nestor KE, Saif YM, Tsai HJ, Patterson RA (1994) Effect of genetic selection for increased body weight and sex of poult on antibody response of turkeys to Newcastle disease virus and Pasteurella multocida vaccines. Avian Dis 38: 33-36.
42. Fulton JE, Arango J, Arthur JA, Settar P, Kreager KS, et al. (2013) Improving the Outcome of a Marek's Disease Challenge in Multiple Lines of Egg Type Chickens. Avian Diseases 57: 519-522.
43. Kapell DNRG, Hill WG, Neeteson A-M, McAdam J, Koerhuis ANM, et al. (2012) Twenty-five years of selection for improved leg health in purebred broiler lines and underlying genetic parameters. Poultry Science 91: 3032-3043.
44. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G (2010) The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 42: 5.
45. Saatchi M, McClure M, McKay S, Rolf M, Kim J, et al. (2011) Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation. Genetics Selection Evolution 43: 40.
46. Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton J, O'Sullivan N, et al. (2011) Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution 43: 23.
47. Wolc A, Arango J, Jankowski T, Settar P, Fulton JE, et al. (2013) Pedigree and genomic analyses of feed consumption and residual feed intake in laying hens. Poult Sci 92: 2270-2275.
48. Legarra A, Calenge F, Mariani P, Velge P, Beaumont C (2011) Use of a reduced set of single nucleotide polymorphisms for genetic evaluation of resistance to Salmonella carrier state in laying hens. Poultry Science 90: 731-736.
49. Su G, Brondum RF, Ma P, Guldbrandtsen B, Aamand GR, et al. (2012) Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (similar to 54,000) and high-density (similar to 777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 4657-4665.
50. Wray NR, Yang J, Hayes BJ, Price AL, Goddard ME, et al. (2013) Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat Rev Genet 14: 507-515.
51. Legarra A, Robert-Granie C, Manfredi E, Elsen JM (2008) Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180: 611-618.
52. Christensen OF, Madsen P, Nielsen B, Ostersen T, Su G (2012) Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. animal 6: 1565-1571.
53. Calus M, Veerkamp R (2011) Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods. Genetics Selection Evolution 43: 26.