Factors underlying restricted crossover localization in barley meiosis

Annual Review of Genetics

Volumn 48, Issue , 2014, Pages 29-47

  Higgins, James D ^a   Osman, Kim ^b   Jones, Gareth H ^b   Franklin, F Chris H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cereals; chiasma; chromosome synapsis; poaceae; recombination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARLEY; BRACHYPODIUM; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME CHIASM; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CROSSING OVER; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; TEMPERATURE; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HORDEUM;

HORDEUM; POACEAE; SYNAPSIS;

CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HORDEUM; MEIOSIS;

EID: 84913592177     PISSN: 00664197     EISSN: 15452948     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092509     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Linkiewicz AM, Dubcovsky J, Hummel D, et al. 2003. Synteny perturbations between wheat homoeologous chromosomes caused by locus duplications and deletions correlate with recombination rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:10836-41
2. Albini SM, Jones GH. 1988. Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum. II. Pachytene observations: the SC karyotype and the correspondence of late recombination nodules and chiasmata. Genome 30:399-410
3. Anderson LK, Doyle GG, Brigham B, Carter J, Hooker KD, et al. 2003. High-resolution crossover maps for each bivalent of Zea mays using recombination nodules. Genetics 165:849-65
4. Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH. 2003. A meiotic time-course for Arabidopsis thaliana. Sex. Plant Reprod. 16:141-49
5. Armstrong SJ, Jones GH. 2003. Meiotic cytology and chromosome behaviour in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 54:1-10
6. Baptista-Giacomelli FR, Pagliarini MS, de Almeida JL. 2000. Meiotic behavior in several Brazilian oat cultivars (Avena sativa L.). Cytologia (Tokyo) 65:371-78
7. Barakate A, Higgins JD, Vivera S, Stephens J, Perry RM, et al. 2014. The synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for imposition of meiotic crossovers in barley. Plant Cell 26:729-40
8. Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, et al. 2010. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327:836-40
9. Bennett MD, Finch RA. 1971. Duration of meiosis in barley. Genet. Res. 17:209-14
10. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Ann. Bot. 95:45-90
11. Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP. 2010. Genetic interference: Don't stand so close to me. Curr. Genomics 11:91-102
12. Bishop DK, Zickler D. 2004. Early decision: meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117:9-15
13. Borde V, Robine N, Lin W, Bonfils S, Geli V, Nicolas A. 2009. HistoneH3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites. EMBO J. 28:99-111
14. Bowers JE, Arias MA, Asher R, Avise JA, Ball RT, et al. 2005. Comparative physical mapping links conservation of microsynteny to chromosome structure and recombination in grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:13206-11
15. Buckler ES, Phelps-Durr TL, Buckler CSK, Dawe RK, Doebley JF, Holtsford TP. 1999. Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. Genetics 153:415-26
16. Calvente A, Viera A, Page J, Parra MT, Gomez R, et al. 2005. DNA double-strand breaks and homology search: inferences from a species with incomplete pairing and synapsis. J. Cell Sci. 118:2957-63
17. Carpenter ATC. 1975. Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. II. The recombination nodule: a recombination-Associated structure at pachytene? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:3186-89
18. Caryl AP, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH. 2000. A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1. Chromosoma 109:62-71
19. Chelysheva L, Grandont L, Vrielynck N, le Guin S, Mercier R, Grelon M. 2010. An easy protocol for studying chromatin and recombination protein dynamics during Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis: immunodetection of cohesins, histones and MLH1. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129:143-53
20. Chen Z, Higgins JD, Hui JTL, Li J, Franklin FCH, Berger F. 2011. Retinoblastoma protein is essential for early meiotic events in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 30:744-55
21. Choi K, Zhao X, Kelly KA, Venn O, Higgins JD, et al. 2013. Arabidopsis meiotic crossover hot spots overlap with H2 A. Z nucleosomes at gene promoters. Nat. Genet. 45:1327-36
22. Colombo PC, Jones GH. 1997. Chiasma interference is blind to centromeres. Heredity 79:214-27
23. Crismani W, Girard C, Froger N, Pradillo M, Santos JL, et al. 2012. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336:1588-90
24. Darlington CD. 1931. Meiosis. Biol. Rev. Biol. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 6:221-64
25. de Boer E, Dietrich AJ, Hoog C, Stam P, Heyting C. 2007. Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis. J. Cell Sci. 120:731-36
26. Dowrick G. 1957. The influence of temperature on meiosis. Heredity 11:37-49
27. Draper J, Mur LAJ, Jenkins G, Ghosh-Biswas GC, Bablak P, et al. 2001. Brachypodium distachyon. A new model system for functional genomics in grasses. Plant Physiol. 127:1539-55
28. Emerson RA, Beadle GW, Fraser AC. 1935. A summary of linkage studies in maize. Cornell Univ. Agric. Stn. Mem. 180:1-83
29. Erayman M, Sandhu D, Sidhu D, Dilbirligi M, Baenziger PS, Gill KS. 2004. Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:3546-65
30. Falque M, Anderson LK, Stack SM, Gauthier F, Martin OC. 2009. Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize. Plant Cell 21:3915-25
31. Ferdous M, Higgins JD, Osman K, Lambing C, Roitinger E, et al. 2012. Inter-homolog crossing-over and synapsis in Arabidopsis meiosis are dependent on the chromosome axis protein AtASY3. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002507
32. Fletcher HL. 1978. Localized chiasmata due to partial pairing: 3D reconstruction of synaptonemal complexes in male Stethophyma grossum. Chromosoma 65:247-69
33. Fogwill M. 1958. Differences in crossing-over and chromosome size in the sex cells of Lilium and Fritillaria. Chromosoma 9:493-504
34. Fox DP. 1973. Control of chiasma distribution in locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal). Chromosoma 43:289-328
35. Fuchs J, Demidov D, Houben A, Schubert I. 2006. Chromosomal histone modification patterns: from conservation to diversity. Trends Plant Sci. 11:199-208
36. Fung JC, Rockmill B, Odell M, Roeder GS. 2004. Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116:795-802
37. Gauthier F, Martin OC, Falque M. CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes. BMC Bioinform. 12:27
38. Harper L, Golubovskaya I, Cande WZ. 2004. A bouquet of chromosomes. J. Cell Sci. 117:4025-32
39. Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH. 2004. The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18:2557-70
40. Higgins JD, Perry RM, Barakat A, Ramsay L, Waugh R, et al. 2012. Spatiotemporal asymmetry of the meiotic program underlies the predominantly distal distribution of meiotic crossovers in barley. Plant Cell 24:4096-109
41. Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH. 2005. The Arabidopsis synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for chromosome synapsis and normal fidelity of crossing over. Genes Dev. 19:2488-500
42. Higgins JD, Vignard J, Mercier R, Pugh AG, Franklin FCH, Jones GH. 2008. AtMSH5 partners AtMSH4 in the class I meiotic crossover pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana, but is not required for synapsis. Plant J. 55:28-39
43. Hollingsworth NM, Byers B. 1989. Hop1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. Genetics 121:445-62
44. Hultén M. 1974. Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. Hereditas 76:55-78
45. Jackson N, Sanchez-Moran E, Buckling E, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH. 2006. Reduced meiotic crossovers and delayed prophase I progression in AtMLH3-deficient Arabidopsis. EMBOJ. 25:1315-23
46. Jones GH. 1987. Chiasmata. In Meiosis, ed. PB Moens, pp. 213-44. Waltham, MA: Acad. Press
47. Jones GH. 1978. Giemsa C-banding of rye meiotic chromosomes and nature of terminal chiasmata. Chromosoma 66:45-57
48. Jones GH. 1984. The control of chiasma distribution. SEB Symp. 38:293-320
49. Jones GH, Franklin FC. 2006. Meiotic crossing-over: obligation and interference. Cell 126:246-48
50. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375-84
51. Kellogg EA. 1998. Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:2005-10
52. Kleckner N. 2006. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 115:175-94
53. Kleckner N, Zickler D, Jones GH, Dekker J, Padmore R, et al. 2004. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12592-97
54. Knoll A, Higgins JD, Seeliger K, Reha SJ, Dangel NJ, et al. 2012. The Fanconi anemia ortholog FANCM ensures ordered homologous recombination in both somatic and meiotic cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:1448-64
55. Kunzel G, Korzun L, Meister A. 2000. Cytologically integrated physical restriction fragment length polymorphism maps for the barley genome based on translocation breakpoints. Genetics 154:397-412
56. Kunzel G, Waugh R. 2002. Integration of microsatellite markers into the translocation-based physical RFLP map of barley chromosome 3 H. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105:660-65
57. Ladizinsky G. 2012. Studies in Oat Evolution: A Man's Life with Avena (Springer Briefs in Agriculture). New York: Springer
58. Laurie DA, Jones GH. 1981. Interindividual variation in chiasma distribution in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Heredity 47:409-16
59. Lhuissier FGP, Offenberg HH, Wittich PE, Vischer NOE, Heyting C. 2007. Themismatch repair protein MLH1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato. Plant Cell 19:862-76
60. Li X, Chang Y, Xin X, Zhu C, Li X, et al. 2013. Replication protein A2c coupled with replication protein A1c regulates crossover formation during meiosis in rice. Plant Cell 25:3885-99
61. Lima de Faria A, Jaworska H. 1972. Relation between chromosome size gradient and sequence of DNA replication in rye. Hereditas 70:39-57
62. Loidl J. 1989. Effects of elevated temperature on meiotic chromosome synapsis in Allium ursinum. Chromosoma 97:449-58
63. Lukaszewski AJ. 1992. A comparison of physical distribution of recombination in chromosome 1R in diploid rye and in hexaploid triticale. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:1048-53
64. Lukaszewski AJ. 2008. Unexpected behavior of an inverted rye chromosome arm in wheat. Chromosoma 117:569-78
65. Lukaszewski AJ, Curtis CA. 1993. Physical distribution of recombination in B-genome chromosomes of tetraploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:121-27
66. Lukaszewski AJ, Kopecky D, Linc G. 2012. Inversions of chromosome arms 4AL and 2BS in wheat invert the patterns of chiasma distribution. Chromosoma 121:201-8
67. Marcon E, Moens P. 2003. MLH1p and MLH3p localize to precociously induced chiasmata of okadaicacid-treated mouse spermatocytes. Genetics 165:2283-87
68. Mayer KFX, Waugh R, Langridge P, Close TJ, Wise RP, et al. 2012. A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 491:711-16
69. McClintock B. 1948. Mutable loci in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Book 47:155-69
70. Mercier R, Grelon M. 2008. Meiosis in plants: ten years of gene discovery. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120:281-90
71. Mercier R, Jolivet S, Vezon D, Huppe E, Chelysheva L, et al. 2005. Twomeiotic crossover classes cohabit in Arabidopsis: One is dependent on MER3, whereas the other one is not. Curr. Biol. 15:692-701
72. Mieczkowski PA, Dominska M, Buck MJ, Gerton JL, Lieb JD, Petes TD. 2006. Global analysis of the relationship between the binding of the Bas1p transcription factor and meiosis-specific double-strand DNA breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:1014-27
73. Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, et al. 2010. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327:876-79
74. Naranjo T, Valenzuela NT, Perera E. 2010. Chiasma frequency is region specific and chromosome conformation dependent in a rye chromosome added to wheat. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129:133-42
75. Newton WCF, Darlington CD. 1930. Fritillaria meleagris chiasma formation and distribution. J. Genet. 22:1-14
76. Nonomura KI, Nakano M, Eiguchi M, Suzuki T, Kurata N. 2006. PAIR2 is essential for homologous chromosome synapsis in rice meiosis I. J. Cell Sci. 119:217-25
77. Oakley HA, Jones GH. 1982. Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela). I. Chromosoma pairing, synaptonemal complexes and chiasma localization in spermatogenesis. Chromosoma 85:311-22
78. Osman K, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH. 2011. Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 190:523-44
79. Page SL, Hawley RS. 2004. The genetics andmolecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20:525-58
80. Paigen K, Petkov P. 2010. Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:221-33
81. Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, Murakami H, Blitzblau HG, et al. 2011. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144:719-31
82. Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2010. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327:835
83. Perrella G, Consiglio MF, Aiese-Cigliano R, Cremona G, Sanchez-Moran E, et al. 2010. Histone hyperacetylation affects meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 62:796-806
84. Phillips D, Nibau C, Wnetrzak J, Jenkins G. 2012. High resolution analysis of meiotic chromosome structure and behaviour in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). PLoS ONE 7:e39539
85. Phillips D, Wnetrzak J, Nibau C, Barakate A, Ramsay L, et al. 2013. Quantitative high resolution mapping of HvMLH3 foci in barley pachytene nuclei reveals a strong distal bias and weak interference. J. Exp. Bot. 64:2139-54
86. Pryor A, Faulkner K, Rhoades MM, Peacock WJ. 1980. Asynchronous replication of heterochromatin in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:6705-9
87. Ronceret A, Pawlowski WP. 2010. Chromosome dynamics in meiotic prophase I in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129:173-83
88. Scherthan H. 2001. A bouquet makes ends meet. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:621-27
89. Smagulova F, Gregoretti IV, Brick K, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2011. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472:375-78
90. Sturtevant AH. 1913. The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. J. Exp. Zool. 14:43-59
91. Tease C. 1978. Cytological detection of crossing-over in BrdU substituted meiotic chromosomes using the fluorescent plus giemsa technique. Nature 272:823-24
92. Tease C, Jones GH. 1978. Analysis of exchanges in differentially stained meiotic chromosomes of Locusta migrotoria after BrdU substitution and FPG staining. I. Crossover exchanges in monochiasmate bivalents. Chromosoma 69:163-78
93. Thompson EA, Roeder GS. 1989. Expression and DNA sequence of RED1, a gene required for meiosis I chromosome segregation in yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218:293-301
94. Wallace BMN, Jones GH. 1978. Incomplete chromosome pairing and its relation to chiasma localization in Stethophyma grossum spermocytes. Heredity 40:385-96
95. Wang KJ, Wang M, Tang D, Shen Y, Qin BX, et al. 2011. PAIR3, an axis-Associated protein, is essential for the recruitment of recombination elements onto meiotic chromosomes in rice. Mol. Biol. Cell 22:12-19
96. Wang M, Wang KJ, Tang D, Wei CX, Li M, et al. 2010. The central element protein ZEP1 of the synaptonemal complex regulates the number of crossovers during meiosis in rice. Plant Cell 22:417-30
97. Watson JD, Callan HG. 1963. The form of bivalent chromosomes in newt oocytes at first metaphase of meiosis. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 104:281-95
98. Yuan WY, Li XW, Chang YX, Wen RY, Chen GX, et al. 2009. Mutation of the rice gene PAIR3 results in lack of bivalent formation in meiosis. Plant J. 59:303-15
99. Zickler D, Kleckner N. 1999. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:603-754