Intraocular lens-shell technique: Adjustment of the surgical procedure leads to greater safety when treating dense nuclear cataracts e112663

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Lixia, Luo ^a   Haotian, Lin ^a   Weirong, Chen ^a   Bo, Qu ^a   Xinyu, Zhang ^a   Zhuoling, Lin ^a   Jingjing, Chen ^a   Yizhi, Liu ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL DENSITY; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR LENS SHELL TECHNIQUE; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; LENS NUCLEUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEMPORAL CLEAR CORNEAL INCISION THICKNESS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 84913582248     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112663     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Leaming DV (1999) Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members-1998 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 25: 851-9.
2. Zeng M, Liu X, Liu Y, Xia Y, Luo L, et al. (2008) Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol 92: 1092-6.
3. Wang Y, Xia Y, Zeng M, Liu X, Luo L, et al. (2009) Torsional ultrasound efficiency under different vacuum levels in different degrees of nuclear cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 35: 1941-5.
4. Gimbel HV, da Reitz Pereira C (2002) Advances in phacoemulsification equipment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13: 30-2.
5. Shah PA, Yoo S (2007) Innovations in phacoemulsification technology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18: 23-6.
6. Ciooni RJ, Osher RH (1995) Intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification surgery. In: Steinert RF, ed. Cataract Surgery: Technique, Complications, and Management, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia pp. 327-40.
7. Polack FM, Sugar A (1976) The phacoemulsification procedure.II. Corneal endothelial changes. Invest Ophthalmol 15: 458-69.
8. Olson LE, Marshall J, Rice NS, Andrews R (1978) Effects of ultrasound on the corneal endothelium: I. The acute lesion. Br J Ophthalmol 62: 134-44.
9. Edelhauser HF, Van Horn DL, Hyndiuk RA, Schulz RO (1975) Intraocular irrigating solutions; their effect on corneal endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol 93: 648-57.
10. Nagahara K (1993) Video Presentation. ASCRS Film Festival, Seattle.
11. Koch PS, Katzen LE (1994) Stop and chop phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 20: 566-70.
12. Luo L, Lin H, He M, Congdon N, Yang Y, et al. (2012) Clinical Evaluation of Three Incision Size-Dependent Phacoemulsification Systems. Am J Ophthalmol 153: 831-9.
13. Buratto L, Packard R (2000) Complications. In: Buratto L, Osher RH, Masket S, eds, Cataract Surgery in Complicated Cases. Thorofare NJ, Slack, 291-9.
14. Hwang HS, Kim EC, Kim MS (2010) Drill-and-crack technique for nuclear disassembly of hard nucleus. J Cataract Refract Surg 36: 1627-30.
15. Simanjuntak GW, Tan JF, Mailangkay HH (2010) Double Extra Sharp Chopper Increase Efficacy of Phacoemulsification for Hard Mature Cataract Surgery. Semin Ophthalmol 25: 8-12.
16. Sato M, Mizushima Y, Oshika T (2008) Visco-shell technique with sodium hyaluronate 2.3% in phacoemulsification of Morgagnian.cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 34: 1824-7.