A guide to research partnerships for pragmatic clinical trials

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 349, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Johnson, Karin E ^a   Tachibana, Chris ^a   Coronado, Gloria D ^b   Dember, Laura M ^c   Glasgow, Russell E ^d   Huang, Susan S ^e   Martin, Paul J ^f   Richards, Julie ^a   Rosenthalprofessor, Gary ^g   Septimus, Ed ^h   Simon, Gregory E ^a   Solberg, Leif ⁱ   Suls, Jerry ^j   Thompson, Ella ^a   Larson, Eric B ^a  

^a GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^h HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA   (United States)

ⁱ HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE   (United States)

^j NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DRUG EFFICACY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL INFECTION; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS INFECTION; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; SKILL; COOPERATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84913570555     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g6826     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Patsopoulos NA. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011;13:217-24.
2. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624-32.
3. Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:464-75.
4. Califf RM, Sanderson I, Miranda ML. The future of cardiovascular clinical research: informatics, clinical investigators, and community engagement. JAMA 2012;308:1747-8.
5. Glasgow RE, Riley WT. Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med 2013;45:237-43.
6. Macpherson H. Pragmatic clinical trials. Complement Ther Med 2004;12:136-40.
7. Matthews S. New NIH effort seeks to find ways to make trials run smoother. Nature Med 2012;18:1598.
8. Huang SS, Septimus E, Kleinman K, Moody J, Hickok J, Avery TR, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2255-65.
9. Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:499-505. (Reprint of J Chron Dis 1967;20:637-48.)
10. Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav 2013;40:257-65.
11. Maclure M. Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policy-makers. CMAJ 2009;180:1001-3.
12. Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008;34:228-43.
13. Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess 2007;11:iii, ix-105.
14. Francis D, Roberts I, Elbourne DR, Shakur H, Knight RC, Garcia J, et al. Marketing and clinical trials: a case study. Trials 2007;8:37.
15. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004;10:307-12.
16. Rahman S, Majumder MA, Shaban SF, Rahman N, Ahmed M, Abdulrahman KB, et al. Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches. Adv Med Educ Pract 2011;2:85-93.
17. Gawlinski A. The power of clinical nursing research: engage clinicians, improve patients' lives, and forge a professional legacy. Am J Crit Care 2008;17:315-26.
18. nd ed. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
19. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012;307:1583-4.
20. Chalkidou K, Tunis S, Whicher D, Fowler R, Zwarenstein M. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials 2012;9:436-46.