A study on significance of system dynamics approach in understanding adoption of information technology in building construction projects

31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, ISARC 2014 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 418-425

  Mathews, Vinay ^a   Varghese, Koshy ^a   Mahalingam, Ashwin ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Adoption; Construction projects; Information technology; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SURVEYS; SYSTEM THEORY;

ADOPTION; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TOOLS; LITERATURE SURVEY; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPROACH; SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84912572229     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.22260/isarc2014/0056     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Basoglu, N., Daim, T. and Kerimoglu, O. Organizational adoption of enterprise resource planning systems: A conceptual framework. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18(1): p. 73-97, 2007
2. Chuttur, M. Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Online: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37,Accessed: 30/05/2014
3. Bagozzi, R.P. The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4): p. 3, 2007
4. Boland, R.J., Lyytinen,K. and Yoo,Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4): p. 631-647,2007
5. Dossick, C.S. and Neff, G. Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaboration using Building Information Modelling. The Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(2): p. 83-93, 2011
6. Whyte, J. Managing digital coordination of design: emerging hybrid practices in an institutionalized project setting. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(3): p. 159-168, 2011
7. Won, J., Lee, G., Dossick, G. Where to Focus for Successful Adoption of BIM within an Organization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 139(11), 2013
8. Sushil. System Dynamics : A practical approach for Mangerial Problems. Wiley Eastern Publication, New Delhi. 1993
9. Sterman, J.D., System dynamics modeling for project management. Online: http://jsterman.scripts.mit.edu/~jsterman/docs/Sterman-1992-SystemDynamicsModeling.pdf. 01/04/2013, Accessed: 30/05/2014
10. Fisher, D.K., Norvell, J., Sonka, S. and Nelson M.J. Understanding technology adoption through system dynamics modeling: implications for agribusiness management. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 3(3): p. 281-296, 2000
11. Venkatesh, V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 27(3), 2003
12. Thompson, R.L. and Higgins, C.A. Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS quarterly. 15(1),1991
13. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.1975
14. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 46(2): p. 186-204, 2000
15. Vallerand, R.J. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 29: p 271-360, 1997
16. Marks, D.F. The health psychology reader. Sage Publications.2002
17. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. 5 ed. 2 Free Press. 2003
18. Hartmann, T., Meerveld, H., Vossebeld, N. and Adriaanse A. Aligning building information model tools and construction management methods. Automation in Construction. 22.p 605-613, 2012
19. Soffer, P., Golany, B. and Dori, D. Aligning an ERP system with enterprise requirements: An object-process based approach. Computers in Industry. 56(6): p. 639-662, 2005
20. Giddens, A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.1984
21. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science. 5(2): p. 121-147,1994
22. Orlikowski, W.J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science. 3(3): p. 398-427, 1992
23. Kellogg, K.C., Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J.A. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science. 17(1): p. 22-44, 2006
24. Sargent, K., Hyland, P. and Sawang, S. Factors influencing the adoption of information technology in a construction business. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building. 12(2): p. 86,2012
25. Peansupap, V. and Walker, D. Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: a micro analysis. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management. 5(3): p. 135-157, 2005
26. Nikas, A., Poulymenakou, A., and Kriaris, P. Investigating antecedents and drivers affecting the adoption of collaboration technologies in the construction industry. Automation in Construction. 16(5): p. 632-641, 2007
27. Baxter, G. and Sommerville, I. Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers. 23(1): p. 4-17, 2011
28. Kadefors, A. Institutions in building projects: implications for flexibility and change. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 11(4): p. 395-408. 1995
29. Engwall, M. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Research Policy. 32(5): p. 789-808, 2003.