Instructional Designer’s Intentions and Learners’ Perceptions of the Instructional Functions of Visuals in an e-Learning Context

Journal of Visual Literacy

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 143-166

  Jin, Sung Hee ^a   Boling, Elizabeth ^b  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

e learning materials; learner perception; media design; visual design; visuals for learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912564115     PISSN: 1051144X     EISSN: 23796529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23796529.2010.11674678     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alesandrini, K. L. (1984). Pictures and adult learning. Instructional Science, 13, 63-77.
2. Anglin, G. J., Vaez, H., & Cunningham, K. L. (2004). Visual Representations and Learning: The Role of Static and Animated Graphics. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 865–913). NY: Simon & Schuster.
3. Barry, A. M. S. (1994). Perceptional aesthetics and visual language. In D. M. Moore, & R. M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual Literacy: A Spectrum of Visual Learning (pp. 113–132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publishing.
4. Bender, B. G., & Levin, J. R. (1978). Pictures, imagery, and related children’s prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 583–588.
5. Boling, E., Eccarius, M., Smith, K., & Frick, T. (2004). Instructional illustrations: Intended meanings and learner interpretations. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(2), 185–204.
6. Brace, I. (2004). Questionnaire design. Market research in practice. London, UK: Kogan Page.
7. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual Prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
8. Carroll, J. M. (1998). Minimalism beyond the nurnberg funnel. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
9. Clark, R. C., Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials. CA: Pfeiffer.
10. Dwyer, F. M. (2007).The program of systematic evaluation (pse): evaluating the effects of multimedia instruction 1965–2007. Educational Technology, 67 (5), 41–45.
11. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
12. Gall, M. D., Borg,W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. White Plains, NY: Longman.
13. Harp, S. F. & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 44–434.
14. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Jung, I. & Rha, I. (2004). Understanding of distance learning. Seoul: kyoyookKahacksa Publishing.
16. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Elements of graph design. New York, NY: Macmillan.
17. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Krippendorf, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, LA; Taylor & Francis.
19. Levie, W. H., Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of the research. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232.
20. Levin, J. R. (1981). On the functions of pictures in prose. In F.J. Pirozzolo & M.C. Wittrock(Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 203–228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Liddle, D. (1996). Design of the conceptual model. In T. Winograd, (Ed.) Bringing Design to Software (pp. 17–31). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Lohr, L. L. (2003). Creating graphics for learning and performance: lessons in visual literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
23. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia instruction: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
24. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320.
27. Norman, D. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28. Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Imaginal and verbal mediators and noun concreteness in paired-associate learning: The elusive interaction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 384–390.
29. Peeck, J. (1987). The role of illustrations in processing and remembering illustrated text. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Basic research (v. 1). NY: Springer-Verlag.
30. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2007). Interaction Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
31. Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, Graphics & Learning. Dubuque, LA: Brown & Benchmark.
32. Schallert, D. L. (1980). The role of illustration in reading comprehension. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
33. Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 49–70). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156.
35. Schriver, K. (1997). Dynamics in Document Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Sless, D. (1986). In Search of Semiotics. London: Groom Helm.
37. Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2560 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19(2), 73–74.
38. Stern, R. C., & Robinson, R. S. (1994). Perception and its role in communication and learning. In D. M. Moore, & R. M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual Literacy: A Spectrum of Visual Learning (pp. 31–52). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publishers.
39. Stone, C. L. (1983). A Meta-Analysis of Advance Organizer Studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51(7), 194–199.
40. Unnava, H. R. & Burnkrant, R. E. (1991). An imagery-processing view of the role of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 226–231.
41. van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics and iconography. In T. van Leeuwen, & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 92–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Watkins, J. K., Miller, E., & Brubaker, D. (2004). The role of the visual image: What are students really learning from pictorial representations. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(1), 23–40.
43. Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 211–247.