Relict species: A relict concept?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 655-663

  Grandcolas, Philippe ^a   Nattier, Romain ^a   Trewick, Steve ^b  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGION; BIOTA; CLADISTICS; EXCAVATION STRUCTURE;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; FOSSIL; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; REPTILE; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; FOSSILS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; REPTILES;

EID: 84912522548     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.002     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Heath T.A., et al. Taxon sampling affects inferences of macroevolutionary processes from phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:160-166.
2. Crisp M.D., et al. Hypothesis testing in biogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:66-72.
3. O'Brien S.J. The platypus genome unravelled. Cell 2008, 133:953-955.
4. Soltis D.E., et al. Missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7:22-31.
5. Friedman W.E., Ryerson K.C. Reconstructing the ancestral female gametophyte of angiosperms: insights from Amborella and other ancient lineages of flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:129-143.
6. Ladiges P.Y., Cantrill D. New Caledonia-Australian connections: biogeographic patterns and geology. Aust. Syst. Bot. 2007, 20:383-389.
7. Jones M.E.H., et al. A sphenodontine (Rhynchocephalia) from the Miocene of New Zealand and palaeobiogeography of the tuatara (Sphenodon). Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276:1385-1390.
8. Heads M. Globally basal centres of endemism: the Tasman-Coral Sea region (south-west Pacific), Latin America and Madagascar/South Africa. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 96:222-245.
9. Goldberg E.E., et al. Diversity, endemism, and age distributions in macroevolutionary sources and sinks. Am. Nat. 2005, 165:623-633.
10. Wallis G.P., Trewick S.A. New Zealand phylogeography: evolution on a small continent. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:3548-3580.
11. Grandcolas P., et al. New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:3309-3317.
12. Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics 1966, University of Illinois Press.
13. Engelmann G.F., Wiley E.O. The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Zool. 1977, 26:1-11.
14. Brooks D.R., McLennan D.A. The Nature Of Diversity. An Evolutionary Voyage of Discovery 2002, University of Chicago Press.
15. Crisp M.D., Cook L.G. Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:122-128.
16. O'Hara R.J. Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biol. Philos. 1992, 7:135-160.
17. Krell F.T., Cranston P.S. Which side of the tree is more basal?. Syst. Entomol. 2004, 29:279-281.
18. Jenner R.A. Unburdening evo-devo: ancestral attractions, model organisms, and basal baloney. Dev. Genes Evol. 2006, 216:385-394.
19. Gregory T.R. Understanding evolutionary trees. Evol. Educ. Outreach 2008, 1:121-137.
20. Zhou Z.Y., Zheng S.L. The missing link in Ginkgo evolution - the modern maidenhair tree has barely changed since the days of the dinosaurs. Nature 2003, 423:821-822.
21. Michener C.D. From solitary to eusocial: need there be a series of intervening species?. Fortschr. Zool. 1985, 31:293-305.
22. Pagel M., et al. Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level. Science 2006, 314:119-121.
23. Royer D.L., et al. Ecological conservatism in the 'living fossil' Ginkgo. Paleobiology 2003, 29:84-104.
24. Hay J.M., et al. Rapid molecular evolution in a living fossil. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:106-109.
25. Casane D., Laurenti P. Why coelacanths are not 'living fossils'. Bioessays 2013, 35:332-338.
26. Friedman M., Coates M.I. A newly recognized fossil coelacanth highlights the early morphological diversification of the clade. Proc. R. Soc. B 2006, 273:245-250.
27. Ladevèze S., et al. First evidence of sexual dimorphism and gregariousness in an early metatherian population. Nature 2014, 474:83-86.
28. Rice D.W., et al. Horizontal transfer of entire genomes via mitochondrial fusion in the angiosperm Amborella. Science 2013, 342:1468-1473.
29. Feild T.S., et al. Hardly a relict: freezing and the evolution of vesselless wood in Winteraceae. Evolution 2002, 56:464-478.
30. Grandcolas P., D'Haese C. Testing adaptation with phylogeny: how to account for phylogenetic pattern and selective value together?. Zool. Scr. 2003, 32:483-490.
31. Mooers A.O., Schluter D. Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: support for one- and two-rate models. Syst. Biol. 1999, 48:623-633.
32. Pagel M., Meade A. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:571-581.
33. Galtier N. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:866-873.
34. Penny D., et al. Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: the covarion model of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 2001, 53:711-723.
35. Santos C.M.D. On basal clades and ancestral areas. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1470-1471.
36. Edwards S.V., Boles W.E. Out of Gondwana: the origin of passerine birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:347-349.
37. Van Dover C.L., et al. Evolution and biogeography of deep-sea vent and seep invertebrates. Science 2002, 295:1253-1257.
38. Bremer K. Ancestral areas - a cladistic reinterpretation of the center of origin concept. Syst. Biol. 1992, 41:436-445.
39. Ronquist F. Ancestral areas and parsimony. Syst. Biol. 1994, 43:267-274.
40. Sanmartin I., et al. Inferring dispersal: a Bayesian approach to phylogeny-based island biogeography, with special reference to the Canary Islands. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35:428-449.
41. Ree R.H., Smith S.A. Maximum likelihood inference of geographic range evolution by dispersal, local extinction, and cladogenesis. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:4-14.
42. Watson D.M. A conceptual framework for studying species composition in fragments, islands and other patchy ecosystems. J. Biogeogr. 2002, 29:823-834.
43. Hampe A., Jump A.S. Climate relicts: past, present, future. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 42:313-333.
44. Woolbright S.A., et al. Climate relicts and their associated communities as natural ecology and evolution laboratories. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29:406-416.
45. Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology 2010, Springer. J.C. Habel, T. Assmann (Eds.).
46. Assmann T., et al. The dark side of relict species biology: cave animals as ancient lineages. Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology 2010, 91-103. Springer. J.C. Habel, T. Assmann (Eds.).
47. Cronk Q.C.B. Relict floras of Atlantic islands: patterns assessed. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1992, 46:91-103.
48. Desutter-Grandcolas L. Studies in cave life evolution: a rationale for future theoretical developments using phylogenetic inference. J. Zool. Sys. Evol. Res. 1997, 35:23-31.
49. Gibert J., Deharveng L. Subterranean ecosystems: a truncated functional biodiversity. Bioscience 2002, 52:473-481.
50. Little C.T.S., Vrijenhoek R.C. Are hydrothermal vent animals living fossils?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:582-588.
51. Yoder A.D., Nowak M.D. Has vicariance or dispersal been the predominant biogeographic force in Madagascar? Only time will tell. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37:405-431.
52. Trewick S.A., et al. Hello New Zealand. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1-6.
53. Fjeldså J., Bowie R.C.K. New perspectives on the origin and diversification of Africa's forest avifauna. Afr. J. Ecol. 2008, 46:235-247.
54. Murienne J. Testing biodiversity hypotheses in New Caledonia using phylogenetics. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:1433-1434.
55. Waters J.M., Craw D. Goodbye Gondwana? New Zealand biogeography, geology, and the problem of circularity. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:351-356.
56. Giribet G., Boyer S. 'Moa's Ark' or 'Goodbye Gondwana': is the origin of New Zealand's terrestrial invertebrate fauna ancient, recent, or both?. Invert. Syst. 2010, 24:1-8.
57. Biffin E., et al. Did kauri (Agathis: Araucariaceae) really survive the Oligocene drowning of New Zealand?. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:594-601.
58. Legendre F., et al. The phylogeny of termites (Dictyoptera: Isoptera) based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes: implications for and the evolution of the worker and pseudergate castes, and foraging behaviors. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48:615-627.
59. Nee S., et al. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1994, 344:77-82.
60. Rabosky D.L. Heritability of extinction rates links diversification patterns in molecular phylogenies and fossils. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:629-640.
61. Crisp M.D., Cook L.G. Explosive radiation or cryptic mass extinction? Interpreting signatures in molecular phylogenies. Evolution 2009, 63:2257-2265.
62. Graham C.H., et al. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:632-636.
63. Carnaval A.C., et al. Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest hotspot. Science 2009, 323:785-789.
64. Murienne J., et al. Species diversity in the New Caledonian endemic genera Cephalidiosus and Nobarnus (Insecta: Heteroptera: Tingidae), an approach using phylogeny and species distribution modelling. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 97:177-184.
65. Grandcolas P., et al. Mapping extrinsic traits such as extinction risks or modelled bioclimatic niches on phylogenies: does it make sense at all?. Cladistics 2011, 27:181-185.
66. Parsons P.A. Environments and evolution: interactions between stress, resource inadequacy and energetic efficiency. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2005, 80:589-610.
67. Vane-Wright R.I., et al. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 1991, 55:235-254.
68. Forest F., et al. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 2007, 445:757-760.
69. Pillon Y., Munzinger J. Amborella fever and its (little) implication in conservation. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10:519-520.
70. Redding D.W., et al. Evolutionarily distinctive species often capture more phylogenetic diversity than expected. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 251:606-615.
71. Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics: Protecting Species in a Major Extinction Crisis 2015, Springer-Verlag. R. Pellens, P. Grandcolas (Eds.).
72. Holmquist C. The relict concept - is it a merely zoogeographical conception?. Oikos 1962, 13:262-292.
73. Warren W.C., et al. Genome analysis of the Platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution. Nature 2008, 453:175-183.
74. Amemiya C.T., et al. Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:3622-3627.
75. Simpson G.G. The Major Features of Evolution 1953, Columbia University Press.
76. Taylor P.D. Extinction and the fossil record. Extinctions in the History of Life 2004, 1-34. Cambridge University Press. P.D. Taylor (Ed.).
77. Sharma P., Giribet G. A relict in New Caledonia: phylogenetic relationships of the family Troglosironidae (Opiliones: Cyphophthalmi). Cladistics 2009, 25:279-294.
78. Ward P.S., et al. Phylogeny and biogeography of dolichoderine ants: effects of data partitioning and relict taxa on historical inference. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:342-362.
79. Purvis A. Phylogenetic approaches to the study of extinction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 39:301-319.
80. Quental T.B., Marshall C.R. Diversity dynamics: molecular phylogenies need the fossil record. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:434-441.
81. Bergsten J. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 2005, 21:163-193.
82. Magallón S. Using fossils to break long branches in molecular dating: a comparison of relaxed clocks applied to the origin of angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:384-399.
83. Soltis D.E., et al. Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1133:3-25.
84. Lee D.E., et al. Where and why have all the flowers gone? Depletion and turnover in the New Zealand Cenozoic angiosperm flora in relation to palaeogeography and climate. Aust. J. Bot. 2001, 49:341-356.
85. Donovan S.E., et al. Morphological phylogenetics of termites (Isoptera). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2000, 70:467-513.
86. Pellens R., et al. The evolutionary transition from subsocial to eusocial behavior: phylogenetic and ecological evidence for modification of the 'shift-in-dependent-care' hypothesis with a new prototermite model. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:616-626.
87. Donovan S.E., et al. Gut content analysis and a new feeding group classification of termites. Ecol. Entomol. 2001, 26:356-366.
88. Nel A., Paicheler J.C. Les Isoptera fossiles: état actuel des connaissances, implications paléoécologiques et paléoclimatologiques (Insecta, Dictyoptera). Cah. Paleontol. 1993, 102-179.