Multi-component modelling of human brain tissue: a contribution to the constitutive and computational description of deformation, flow and diffusion processes with application to the invasive drug-delivery problem

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 861-879

  Ehlers, Wolfgang ^a   Wagner, Arndt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

anisotropy; brain tissue; extra vascular drug infusion; finite deformations; multi component modelling; Theory of Porous Media

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; ANISOTROPY; BLOOD VESSELS; BRAIN; COMPUTATION THEORY; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY; DEFORMATION; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; DRUG INFUSION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LIQUIDS; MEDICAL IMAGING; POROUS MATERIALS; TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY;

BRAIN TISSUE; COUPLED PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EULER TIME INTEGRATION SCHEME; FINITE DEFORMATIONS; INVASIVE DRUG DELIVERY; MULTICOMPONENTS; THEORY OF POROUS MEDIAS; TWO-COMPONENT MIXTURES;

TISSUE;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; BRAIN TISSUE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; POSSIBILITY; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SKELETON MALFORMATION; VELOCITY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; DIFFUSION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANISOTROPY; BRAIN; DIFFUSION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHARMACOKINETICS;

EID: 84912076617     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2013.853754     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AcartürkA. 2009. Simulation of charged hydrated porous materials [dissertation thesis], Report No. II-18, Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), University of Stuttgart.
2. BasserPJ, MattieloJ, LebihanD. 1994. Estimation of effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin-echo. J Magn Reson. 103(3):247–254.
3. BaxterLT, JainRK. 1989. Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors: I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc Res. 37(1):77–104.
4. BoboRH, LaskeDW, AkbasakA, MorrisonPF, DedrickRL, OldfieldEH. 1994. Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 91(6):2076–2080.
5. BowenRM. 1976. Theory of mixtures. In: EringenAC, editor. Continuum physics. Vol. III. New York: Academic Press. p. 1–127.
6. BrezziF, FortinM. 1991. Mixed and hybrid finite element methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. ChenX, SarntinoranontM. 2007. Biphasic finite element model of solute transport for direct infusion into nervous tissue. Ann Biomed Eng. 35(12):2145–2158.
8. Dutta-RoyT, WittekA, MillerK. 2008. Biomechanical modelling of normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Biomech. 41(10):2263–2271.
9. EhlersW. 2002. Foundations of multiphasic and porous materials. In: EhlersW, BluhmJ, editors. Porous media: theory, experiments and numerical applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p. 3–86.
10. EhlersW. 2009. Challenges of porous media models in geo- and biomechanical engineering including electro-chemically active polymers and gels. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math. 1(1):1–24.
11. EhlersW, EipperG. 1999. Finite elastic deformations in liquid-saturated and empty porous solids. Transp Porous Media. 34(1–3):179–191.
12. EhlersW, EllsiepenP, BlomeP, MahnkopfD, MarkertB. 1999. Theoretische und numerische Studien zur Lösung von Rand- und Anfangswertproblemen in der Theorie Poröser Medien, Report No. 96-II-1, Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), University of Stuttgart.
13. EhlersW, MarkertB. 2003. A macroscopic finite strain model for cellular polymers. Int J Plasticity. 19(7):961–976.
14. EhlersW, WagnerA. 2013. Constitutive and computational aspects in tumor therapies of multiphasic brain tissue. In: HolzapfelGA, KuhlE, editors. Computer models in biomechanics: from nano to macro. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 263–276.
15. EhlersW, ZinatbakhshS, MarkertB. 2013. Stability analysis of finite difference schemes revisited: a study of decoupled solution strategies for coupled multifield problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 94:758–786.
16. EllsiepenP. 1999. Zeit- und ortsadaptive Verfahren angewandt auf Mehrphasenprobleme poröser Medien [dissertation thesis]. Report No. 11-3, Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), University of Stuttgart.
17. FranceschiniG, BigoniD, RegitnigP, HolzapfelGA. 2006. Brain tissue deforms similarly to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory. J Mech Phys Solids. 54(12):2592–2620.
18. GroothuisDR, BenalcazarH, AllenCV. 2000. Comparison of cytosine arabinoside delivery to rat brain by intraveneous, intrathecal, intraventricular and intraparenchymal routes of administration. Brain Res. 856(1):281–290.
19. HakimS, AdamsRD. 1965. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure – observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci. 2(4):307–327.
20. KaczmarekM, SubramaniamRP, NeffSR. 1997. The hydromechanics of hydrocephalus: steady-state solutions for cylindrical geometry. Bull Math Biol. 59(2):295–323.
21. KawakamiK, KawakamiM, KioiM. 2004. Distribution kinetics of targeted cytotoxin in glioma by bolus or convection-enhanced delivery in a murine model. J Neurosurg. 101(6):1004–1011.
22. KimJH, MareciTH, SarntinoranontM. 2010. A voxelized model of direct infusion into the corpus callosum and hippocampus of the rat brain: model development and parameter analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 48(3):203–214.
23. LinningerAA, SomayajiMR, MekarskM, ZhangL. 2008. Prediction of convection-enhanced drug delivery to the human brain. J Theor Biol. 250(1):125–138.
24. LippertH. 2006. Lehrbuch Anatomie. 7th ed. München: Elsevier.
25. MarkertB. 2007. A constitutive approach to 3-d nonlinear fluid flow through finite deformable porous continua. Transp Porous Media. 70(3):427–450.
26. MarkertB, EhlersW, KarajanN. 2005. A general polyconvex strain-energy function for fiber-reinforced materials. Proc Appl Math Mech. 5(1):245–246.
27. MarkertB, HeiderY, EhlersW. 2010. Comparison of monolithic and splitting solution schemes for dynamic porous media problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 82:1341–1383.
28. MorrisonPF, LaskeDW, BoboH, OldfieldEH, DedrickRL. 1994. High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics. Am J Physiol. 266(1):292–305.
29. NagashimaT, TamakiN, MatsumotoS, HorwitzB, SeguchiY. 1987. Biomechanics of hydrocephalus: a new theoretical model. Neurosurgery. 21(6):898–903.
30. PardridgeWM. 1996. Physiologic-based strategies for protein drug delivery to the brain. J Control Release. 39(2):281–286.
31. SarntinoranontM, ChenX, ZhaoJ, MareciTM. 2006. Computational model of interstitial transport in the spinal cord using diffusion tensor imaging. Ann Biomed Eng. 34(8):1304–1321.
32. SchünkeM, SchulteE, SchumacherU. 2006. Prometheus: LernAtlas der Anatomie, Kopf und Neuroanatomie. Stuttgart: Georg-Thieme-Verlag.
33. SmithJH, HumphreyJA. 2007. Interstitial transport and transvascular fluid exchange during infusion into brain and tumor tissue. Microvasc Res. 73(1):58–73.
34. StøverudKH, DarcisM, HelmigR, HassanizadehSM. 2011. Modeling concentration distribution and deformation during convection-enhanced drug delivery into brain tissue. Transp Porous Media. 92(1):119–143.
35. SuS-W, PayneSJ. 2009. A two phase model of oxygen transport in cerebral tissue. In: Annual international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society. p. 4921–4924. 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332469.
36. SykováE, NicholsonC. 2008. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiol Rev. 88(4):1277–1340.
37. TaylorZ, MillerK. 2004. Reassessment of brain elasticity for analysis of biomechanics of hydocephalus. J Biomech. 37(8):1263–1269.
38. TuchDS, WedeenVJ, DaleAM, GeorgeJS, BelliveauJW. 2001. Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 98(20):11697–11701.
39. VogesJ, ReszkaR, GossmannA, et al. 2003. Imaging-guided convection-enhanced delivery and gene therapy of glioblastoma. Ann Neurol. 54(4):479–487.
40. WagnerA, EhlersW. 2008. A porous media model to describe the behaviour of brain tissue. Proc Appl Math Mech. 8:10201–10202. 10.1002/pamm.200810201.
41. WagnerA, EhlersW. 2010. Continuum-mechanical analysis of human brain tissue. Proc Appl Math Mech. 10(1):99–100.
42. ZienkiewiczOC, TaylorRL. 2000. The finite element method. The basis. 5th ed. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann.