Empowering the learner to reflect: Do we need another approach?

Medical Education

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1146-1147

  Wass, Val ^a   Harrison, Chris ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84912060875     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12612     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Hoff B. The Te of Piglet. New York, NY: Dutton 1992.
2. Nyugen QD, Fernandez N, Karsenti T, Charlin B. What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and proposal of a five-component model Med Educ 2014;48:1178-1191.
3. Wiktionary. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/a_camel_is_a_horse_designed_by_a_committee. [Accessed 03 September 2014.]
4. Murdoch-Eaton D, Sandars J. Reflection moving from mandatory ritual to meaningful professional development. Arch Dis Child 2014;99 (3):279-83.
5. Hodges BD, Ginsburg S, Cruess R et al. Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 2011;33 (5):354-63.
6. Driessen E, Van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten CPM, Wass V. Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review Med Educ 2007;41:1224-33.