Funding sources for canadian biorepositories: The role of user fees and strategies to help fill the gap

Biopreservation and Biobanking

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 300-305

  Barnes, Rebecca O ^a   Schacter, Brent ^a,b   Kodeeswaran, Sugy ^c   Watson, Peter H ^a,d  

^a Canadian Tumour Repository Network   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUDGET; CANADIAN; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; FEE; FUNDING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; STANDARDIZATION; CANADA; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CANADA; DATA COLLECTION; FEES AND CHARGES; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMIC;

EID: 84912041662     PISSN: 19475535     EISSN: 19475543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2014.0052     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Mabile L, Dalgeish R, Thorisson GA, et al. Quantifying the use of bioresources for promoting their sharing in scientific research. GigaScience 2013;2:7-15.
2. Watson PH, Nussbeck SY, Carter C, et al. A framework for biobank sustainability. Biopreserv Biobank 2014;12:60-68.
3. Watson PH, Barnes RO. A proposed schema for classifying human research biorepositories. Biopreserv Biobank 2011; 9:327-333.
4. Knoppers BM, Zawati MH, Kirby ES. Sampling populations of humans across the world: ELSI issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012;13:395-413.
5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans; 1998 (with 2000, 2002 and 2005 amendments).
6. Massett HA, Atkinson NL, Weber D, et al. Assessing the needs for a standardized cancer HUman Biobank (caHUB): Findings from a national survey with cancer researchers. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011;2011:8-15.
7. Gee S, Georghiou L, Oliver R, Yuille M. Financing UK biobanks: Rationale for a National Biobanking Research Infrastructure - Work Package 7 Cost Model. May 2013.
8. The Cancer Human Biobank (caHUB). cited July 2014. Available from: http://caHUB.cancer.gov/.
9. Albert M, Bartlett J, Watson P, et al. Recovering costs: Is full self-sustainability possible? Biopreserv Biobank. (Submitted for publication.)
10. Cheah S, O'Donoghue S, Daudt H, et al. Permission to Contact (PTC)-A strategy to enhance patient engagement in translational research. Biopreserv Biobank 2014;11: 245-252.
11. Le Blanc J, Dee S, Braun L, et al. Impact of a 'Permission to Contact'(PTC) platform on biobank enrollment and efficiency. Biopreserv Biobank 2013;11:144-148.
12. CTRNet Policy 09-Biobank Planning. CTRNet 2014. Available on-line: www.ctrnet.ca/Policies. Last accessed October 6, 2014.