Understanding long-term unmet needs in Australian survivors of stroke

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 9, Issue A100, 2014, Pages 106-112

  Andrew, Nadine E ^a   Kilkenny, Monique ^a,b   Naylor, Rebecca ^c   Purvis, Tara ^a   Lalor, Erin ^c   Moloczij, Natasha ^b   Cadilhac, Dominique A ^a,b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^c National Stroke Foundation Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community care; Outcomes; Stroke; Stroke care; Treatment; Unmet needs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIAN; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVOR; AUSTRALIA; COMPLICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABLED PERSON; HEALTH SURVEY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COGNITION DISORDERS; DISABLED PERSONS; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; STROKE; SURVIVORS;

EID: 84912033912     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12325     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Deloitte Access Economics. The Economic Impact of Stroke in Australia. Melbourne, Australia, National Stroke Foundation, 2013.
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Stroke and Its Management in Australia: An Update. Canberra, AIHW, 2013.
3. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM etal. Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2004; 35:2340-2345.
4. Paul SL, Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RAL, Thrift AG. Long-term outcome in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study: predictors of quality of life at 5 years after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36:2082-2086.
5. Hackett ML, Anderson CS. Predictors of depression after stroke: a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2005; 36:2296-2301.
6. White JH, Alston MK, Marquez JL etal. Community-dwelling stroke survivors: function is not the whole story with quality of life. Arch Phys Med 2007; 88:1140-1146.
7. Sumathipala K, Radcliffe E, Sadler E, Wolfe C, McKevitt C. Identifying the long-term needs of stroke survivors using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Chronic Illn 2011; 8:31-44.
8. White JH, Magin P, Attia J, Pollack MR, Sturm J, Levi CR. Exploring poststroke mood changes in community-dwelling stroke survivors: a qualitative study. Arch Phys Med 2008; 89:1701-1707.
9. Teoh V, Sims J, Milgrom J. Psychosocial predictors of quality of life in a sample of community-dwelling stroke survivors: a longitudinal study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16:157-166.
10. Fox M, Kostanski M. The needs of younger stroke survivors. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci 2007; 2:427-433.
11. Ch'ng A, French D, McLean N. Coping with the challenges of recovery from stroke. J Health Psychol 2008; 13:1136-1146.
12. White JH, Magin P, Pollack MR. Stroke patients'experience with the Australian health system: a qualitative study. Can J Occup Ther 2009; 76:81-89.
13. Murray J, Young J, Forster A. Review of longer-term problems after a disabling stroke. Rev Clin Gerentol 2007; 17:277-292.
14. Graven C, Brock K, Hill K, Joubert L. Are rehabilitation and/or care co-ordination interventions delivered in the community effective in reducing depression, facilitating participation and improving quality of life after stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33:1501-1520.
15. Rhoda A, Shelling L, Dennett R, Ayers T, Evans P, Campbell J. The effectiveness of various models of primary care-based follow-up after stroke: a systematic review. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2011; 12:214-222.
16. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Wolfe C. The Stroke Association UK Stroke Survivor Needs Survey. London, UK, The Stroke Association, 2010.
17. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J etal. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke 2011; 42:1398-1403.
18. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Measuring Remoteness: Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA). Canberra, Commonwealth Government of Australia, 2001. October, Report No.
19. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics. New York, Wiley & Sons, 1980.
20. Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke 2002; 33:1041-1047.
21. National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit - Rehabilitation Services Report. Melbourne, Australia, National Stroke Foundation, 2012.
22. Peoples H, Satink T, Steultjens E. Stroke survivors' experience of rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand J Occup Ther 2011; 18:163-171.
23. National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit Rehabilitation Services 2012. Melbourne, National Stroke Foundation, 2013.
24. Palmcrantz S, Holmqvist L, Sommerfeld D. Long-term health states relevant to young persons with stroke living in the community in southern Stockholm - a study of self-rated disability and predicting factors. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34:817-823.
25. Tistad M, Tham K, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Unfulfilled rehabilitation needs and dissatisfaction with care 12 months after a stroke: an explorative observational study. BMC Neurol 2012; 12:40.
26. Robinson R, Murata Y, Shimoda K. Dimensions of social impairment and their effect on depression and recovery following stroke. Int Psychogeriatr 1999; 11:375-384.
27. Murray J, Young J, Forster A. Review of longer-term problems after a disabling stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol 2007; 17:277-292.