Which values are important for patients during involuntary treatment? A qualitative study with psychiatric inpatients

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 832-836

  Valenti, Emanuele ^a,b   Giacco, Domenico ^b   Katasakou, Christina ^b   Priebe, Stefan ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; FEMALE; FREEDOM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HOSPITAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORALITY; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; FREEDOM; HOSPITALS, PSYCHIATRIC; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INPATIENTS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLING STUDIES; VOLITION;

EID: 84912030718     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100370     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Habermas J. Between facts and norms: contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Maden, MA: Polity Press, 1996:287-301.
2. Gutmann A, Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004:1-12.
3. Moreno JD. Deciding together: bioethics and moral consensus. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:53-64.
4. Gracia D. Ethical case deliberation and decision making. Med Healthc Philos 2003;6:227-332.
5. Emmanuel EJ, Emmanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. J Am Med Assoc 1992;267(16):2221-6.
6. Gracia D. Deliberation and consensus. In: Chadwick R, Have HT, Meslin EM. eds. The SAGE handbook of health care ethics. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 2011:84-94.
7. Kelly E. Material ethics of values: Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann. London: Springer, 2011:61-81.
8. Gracia D. Moral deliberation: the role of methodologies in clinical ethics. Med Healthc Philos 2001;4(2):223-32.
9. Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics II.6:1106b35. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002:117.
10. Katsakou C, Rose D, Amos T, et al. Psychiatric patient's view on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012;47:1169-79.
11. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. London: Sage, 2012:120-35.
12. Priebe S, Katsakou C, Amos T, et al. Patient's views and readmission 1 year after involuntary hospitalization. Br J Psychiatry 2009;194:49-54.
13. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:29-53.
14. Charmaz K. Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. eds. Qualitative reearch. London: Sage, 2000:509-35.
15. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage, 1994:50-88.
16. Arboleda-Florez J. Psychiatry and law-do the fields agree in their views on coercive treatment? In: Kallert TW, Mezzich JE, Monhanan J. eds. Coercive treatment in psychiatry: clinical, legal and ethical aspects. London: Wiley, 2011:54-62.
17. Dressing H, Salize HJ. Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States. Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004;39(10):797-803.
18. Quirk A, Lelliot P, Seale C. The permeable institution: an ethnographics study of three acute psychiatric wards in London. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:2105-17.
19. Quirk A, Lellitot P, Seale C. Service users' strategies for managing risk in the volatile environment of an acute psychiatric Ward. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:2573-83.
20. Jones IR, Ahmed N, Catty J, et al. Illness careers and continuity of care in mental health service: a qualitative study of service users and carers. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:632-9.
21. Johansson IM, Lundman B. Patient's experiences of involuntary psychiatric care: good opportunities and great losses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2002;9:639-47.
22. Amering M, Stastny P, Hopper K. Psychiatric advanced directives: qualitative study of informed deliberation by mental health service user. Br J Psychiatry 2005;186:247-52.
23. Katsakou C, Marougka S, Garabette J, et al. Why do some involuntary patients feel coerced into hospitalization? A mixed-methods study. Psychiatry Res 2011;187:275-82.
24. Beachamp TL, Childress JF. Principle of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001:123-45.
25. Beauchamp TL. Standing on principle. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010:23-8.