Tasting calories differentially affects brain activation during hunger and satiety

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 279, Issue , 2015, Pages 139-147

  van Rijn, Inge ^a   de Graaf, Cees ^a   Smeets, Paul A M ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate; Energy sensing; FMRI; Median cingulate; Oral cavity; Sweetness

Indexed keywords

MALTODEXTRIN; SUCRALOSE; POLYSACCHARIDE; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENT; TRICHLOROSUCROSE;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ANTERIOR INSULA; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CINGULATE GYRUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; FRONTAL GYRUS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; HUNGER; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; MOTIVATION; NEUROIMAGING; PARIETAL GYRUS; POSTCENTRAL GYRUS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SATIETY; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; SWEETNESS; THALAMUS; VENTROLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; BRAIN; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; DRUG EFFECTS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; HUNGER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POLYSACCHARIDES; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SATIATION; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE PERCEPTION; THALAMUS;

EID: 84912003714     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Mattes R.D. Oral fatty acid signaling and intestinal lipid processing: support and supposition. Physiol Behav 2011, 105:27-35.
2. Stewart J.E., Feinle-Bisset C., Keast R.S.J. Fatty acid detection during food consumption and digestion: associations with ingestive behavior and obesity. Prog Lipid Res 2011, 50:225-233.
3. Degrace-Passilly P., Besnard P. CD36 and taste of fat. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012, 15:107-111.
4. Newman L., Haryono R., Keast R. Functionality of fatty acid chemoreception: a potential factor in the development of obesity. Nutrients 2013, 5:1287-1300.
5. Chandrashekar J., Hoon M.A., Ryba N.J., Zuker C.S. The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 2006, 444:288-294.
6. Damak S., Rong M., Yasumatsu K., Kokrashvili Z., Varadarajan V., Zou S., et al. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science 2003, 301:850-853.
7. Zhao G.Q., Zhang Y., Hoon M.A., Chandrashekar J., Erlenbach I., Ryba N.J.P., et al. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 2003, 115:255-266.
8. de Araujo I.E., Oliveira-Maia A.J., Sotnikova T.D., Gainetdinov R.R., Caron M.G., Nicolelis M.A.L., et al. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron 2008, 57:930-941.
9. Sclafani A., Clyne A.E. Hedonic response of rats to polysaccharide and sugar solutions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1987, 11:173-180.
10. Sclafani A., Mann S. Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared. Physiol Behav 1987, 40:563-568.
11. Sclafani A. Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity: an overview. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1987, 11:131-153.
12. Chambers E.S., Bridge M.W., Jones D.A. Carbohydrate sensing in the human mouth: effects on exercise performance and brain activity. J Physiol 2009, 587:1779-1794.
13. Jeukendrup A.E., Chambers E.S. Oral carbohydrate sensing and exercise performance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010, 13:447-451.
14. Rollo I., Williams C. Effect of mouth-rinsing carbohydrate solutions on endurance performance. Sports Med 2011, 41:449-461.
15. Pottier A., Bouckaert J., Gilis W., Roels T., Derave W. Mouth rinse but not ingestion of a carbohydrate solution improves 1-h cycle time trial performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010, 20:105-111.
16. Turner C.E., Byblow W.D., Stinear C.M., Gant N. Carbohydrate in the mouth enhances activation of brain circuitry involved in motor performance and sensory perception. Appetite 2014, 80:212-219.
17. Frank G.K.W., Oberndorfer T.A., Simmons A.N., Paulus M.P., Fudge J.L., Yang T.T., et al. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1559-1569.
18. Smeets P.A.M., Weijzen P., de Graaf C., Viergever M.A. Consumption of caloric and non-caloric versions of a soft drink differentially affects brain activation during tasting. Neuroimage 2011, 54:1367-1374.
19. Griffioen-Roose S., Smeets P.A., Weijzen P.L., van Rijn I., van den Bosch I., de Graaf C. Effect of replacing sugar with non-caloric sweeteners in beverages on the reward value after repeated exposure. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e81924-e81930.
20. Beelen M., Berghuis J., Bonaparte B., Ballak S.B., Jeukendrup A.E., van Loon L.J.C. Carbohydrate mouth rinsing in the fed state: lack of enhancement of time-trial performance. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2009, 19:400-409.
21. Haase L., Cerf-Ducastel B., Murphy C. Cortical activation in response to pure taste stimuli during the physiological states of hunger and satiety. Neuroimage 2009, 44:1008-1021.
22. Cahill L. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7:477-484.
23. Smeets P.A.M., de Graaf C., Stafleu A., van Osch M.J.P., Nievelstein R.A.J., van der Grond J. Effect of satiety on brain activation during chocolate tasting in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2006, 83:1297-1305.
24. Uher R., Treasure J., Heining M., Brammer M.J., Campbell I.C. Cerebral processing of food-related stimuli: effects of fasting and gender. Behav Brain Res 2006, 169:111-119.
25. Van Strien T. Dutch eating behavior questionnaire manual 2005, Boom Test Publishers, Amsterdam. 1st ed.
26. Frank T.C., Kim G.L., Krzemien A., Van Vugt D.A. Effect of menstrual cycle phase on corticolimbic brain activation by visual food cues. Brain Res 2010, 1363:81-92.
27. Alonso-Alonso M., Ziemke F., Magkos F., Barrios F.A., Brinkoetter M., Boyd I., et al. Brain responses to food images during the early and late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy young women: relation to fasting and feeding. Am J Clin Nutr 2011, 94:377-384.
28. Dreher J-C., Schmidt P.J., Kohn P., Furman D., Rubinow D., Berman K.F. Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:2465-2470.
29. Deichmann R., Gottfried J.A., Hutton C., Turner R. Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 19:430-441.
30. Siep N., Roefs A., Roebroeck A., Havermans R., Bonte M.L., Jansen A. Hunger is the best spice: an fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res 2009, 198:149-158.
31. Mehta S., Melhorn S.J., Smeraglio A., Tyagi V., Grabowski T., Schwartz M.W., et al. Regional brain response to visual food cues is a marker of satiety that predicts food choice. Am J Clin Nutr 2012, 96:989-999.
32. Griffioen-Roose S., Smeets P.A., van den Heuvel E., Boesveldt S., Finlayson G., de Graaf C. Human protein status modulates brain reward responses to food cues. Am J Clin Nutr 2014, 100:113-122.
33. Maldjian J.A., Laurienti P.J., Kraft R.A., Burdette J.H. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1233-1239.
34. Amaro E., Barker G.J. Study design in fMRI: basic principles. Brain Cogn 2006, 60:220-232.
35. van der Laan L.N., de Ridder D.T.D., Viergever M.A., Smeets P.A.M. The first taste is always with the eyes: a meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. Neuroimage 2011, 55:296-303.
36. Bennett C.M., Miller M.B. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010, 1191:133-155.
37. Grabenhorst F., Rolls E.T. Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 27:723-729.
38. Brown C.A., Jones A.K. A role for midcingulate cortex in the interruptive effects of pain anticipation on attention. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:2370-2379.
39. Vogt B.A. Structural and functional dichotomy of human midcingulate cortex. Eur J Neurosci Soc 2003, 18:3134-3144.
40. Small D.M., Zatorre R.J., Dagher A., Evans A.C., Jones-Gotman M. Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: from pleasure to aversion. Brain 2001, 124:1720-1733.
41. Maddock R.J. The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: new insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain. Trends Neurosci 1999, 22:310-316.
42. Petrides M. Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005, 360:781-795.
43. Aron A.R., Fletcher P.C., Bullmore E.T., Sahakian B.J., Robbins T.W. Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci 2003, 6:115-116.
44. Menon V., Adleman N.E., White C.D., Glover G.H., Reiss A.L. Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:131-143.
45. Swick D., Ashley V., Turken A. Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition. BMC Neurosci 2008, 9:102.
46. Rubia K., Smith A.B., Brammer M.J., Taylor E. Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection. Neuroimage 2003, 20:351-358.
47. Liddle P.F., Kiehl K.A., Smith A.M. Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:100-109.
48. Lundström J.N., Boesveldt S., Albrecht J. Central processing of the chemical senses: an overview. ACS Chem Neurosci 2011, 2:5-16.
49. Jacobson A., Green E., Murphy C. Age-related functional changes in gustatory and reward processing regions: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2010, 53:602-610.
50. Zald D.H., Pardo J.V. Cortical activation induced by intraoral stimulation with water in humans. Chem Senses 2000, 25:267-275.
51. de Araujo I.E.T., Kringelbach M.L., Rolls E.T., McGlone F. Human cortical responses to water in the mouth, and the effects of thirst. J Neurophysiol 2003, 90:1865-1876.