Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with pythagorean fuzzy sets

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1061-1078

  Zhang, Xiaolu ^a   Xu, Zeshui ^b  

^a Southeast University   (China)

^b Sichuan University   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUZZY SETS;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; NEGATIVE-IDEAL SOLUTIONS; OPTIMAL ALTERNATIVE; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84912000476     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.21676     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bellman RE, Zadeh LA. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci 1970;17: B-141-B-164.
2. Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1986;20:87-96.
3. Yager RR. Level sets and the representation theorem for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 2010;14:1-7.
4. Xu ZS,Yager RR. Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int J Approx Reason 2008;48:246-262.
5. Atanassov KT, Pasi G, Yager RR. Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multiperson and multi-measurement tool decision making. Int J Syst Sci 2005;36:859-868.
6. Yager RR. OWA aggregation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 2009;38:617-641.
7. Xu ZS, Yager RR. Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 2011;41:568-578.
8. Yager RR. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In Proc. Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, 2013. pp 57-61.
9. Yager RR. Pythagorean membership grades in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2014;22:958-965.
10. Yager RR, Abbasov AM. Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 2013;28:436-452.
11. Hwang CL,Yoon KS.Multiple attibute decision methods and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1981.
12. Chen CT. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2000;114:1-9.
13. Chen TY, Tsao CY. The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2008;159:1410-1428.
14. Boran FE, Genc¸ S, Kurt M, Akay D. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 2009;36:11363-11368.
15. Xu ZS, Zhang XL. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-Based Syst 2013;52:53-64.
16. Beg I, Rashid T. TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int J Intell Syst 2013;28:1162-1171.
17. Xu ZS. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2007;15:1179-1187.
18. Gau WL, Buehrer DJ. Vague sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1993;23:610-614.
19. Xu ZS, Yager RR. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 2006;35:417-433.
20. Sugeno M. Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey. Fuzzy Automata Decis Process 1977;78:89-102.
21. Yager RR. On the measure of fuzziness and negation part I: membership in the unit interval. Int J Gen Syst 1979;5:221-229.
22. Yager RR. On the measure of fuzziness and negation. II. Lattices. Inf Control 1980;44:236-260.
23. Hadi-Vencheh A, Mirjaberi M. Fuzzy inferior ratio method for multiple attribute decision making problems. Inform Sci 2014;277:263-272.
24. Liao HC, Xu ZS. A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 2013;12:373-392.
25. Zhang XL, Xu ZS. The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl-Based Syst 2014;61:48-58.
26. Liou JJ, Tsai CY, Lin RH, Tzeng GH. A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. J Air Transp Manage 2011;17:57-61.
27. Shen L, Olfat L, Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Diabat A. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour Conserv Recy 2013;74:170-179.