Flawed by Dasein? Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology, and the Personal Experience of Physiotherapy

Human Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 431-446

  Abrams, Thomas ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disability; Ethnomethodology; Heidegger; Ontological difference; Phenomenology; Physiotherapy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912000154     PISSN: 01638548     EISSN: 1572851X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-014-9316-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrams, T. (2013). Being-towards-death and taxes: Heidegger, disability, and the ontological difference. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 2(1), 28–50.
2. Carr, D. (1970). Husserl’s problematic concept of the life-world. American Philosophical Quarterly,7(4), 331–339.
3. Cott, C. A. (2004). Client-centered rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation,26(24), 1411–1422.
4. Cott, C. A. (2008). Client-centered rehabilitation: what is it and how do we measure it? Physiotherapy,94, 89–90.
5. Cott, C. A., Teare, G., McGilton, K. S., & Lineker, S. (2006). Reliability and construct validity of the client-centered rehabilitation questionnaire. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(22), 1387–1397.
6. Dreyfus, H. (1993). Heidegger’s critique of the Husserl/Searle account of intentionality. Social Research,60(1), 17–38.
7. Eisenberg, N. (2012). Post-structural conceptualizations of power relationships in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice,28(6), 439–446.
8. Emerson, J. (1970). Behavior in private places: Sustaining definitions of reality in gynecological examinations. In H. Dreitzel (Ed.), Recent Sociology (Vol. 2, pp. 74–97). New York: Macmillan.
9. Frank, A. (2000). The standpoint of the storyteller. Qualitative Health Research,10(3), 354–365.
10. Frank, A. (2002). At the will of the body: Reflections on illness. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. French, S., & Swain, J. (2004). Researching together: A participatory approach. In physiotherapy: A psychosocial approach. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
12. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
13. Garfinkel, H., & Liberman, K. (2007). Introduction: The lebenswelt origins of the sciences. Human Studies,30(1), 3–7.
14. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: Anchor Books.
15. Guignon, C. (1983). Heidegger and the problem of knowledge. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
16. Guignon, C. (1984). Heidegger’s “authenticity” revisited. The Review of Metaphysics,38(2), 321–339.
17. Heidegger, M. (1977). Science and Reflection (W. Lovitt, Trans.). In W. Lovitt (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 155–182). New York: Harper and Row.
18. Heidegger, M. (1992). The concept of time (W. McNeil, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Heidegger, M. (1993a). The origin of the work of art. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings (2nd ed., pp. 143–212). San Francisco: Harper Collins.
20. Heidegger, M. (1993b). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings (2nd ed., pp. 307–342). San Francisco: Harper Collins.
21. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.
22. Husserl, E. (1939). The origin of geometry. In T. Luckmann (Ed.), Phenomenology and sociology: Selected readings (pp. 42–70). London: Penguin.
23. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology; an introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
24. Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. McHoul, A. (1998). How can ethnomethodology be Heideggerian? Human Studies,21, 13–26.
26. Michalko, R. (1998). The mystery of the eye and the shadow of blindness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27. Michalko, R. (1999). The two-in-one: Walking with smokie, walking with blindness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
28. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
29. Nichols, D. A., & Gibson, B. E. (2010). The body and physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice,26(8), 497–509.
30. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.
31. Raby, R. C. (2000). Re-configuring agnes: The telling of a transsexual’s story. Torquere: Journal of the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Studies Association,2, 18–35.
32. Robillard, A. (1994). Communication problems in the intensive care unit. Qualitative Sociology,17(4), 383–395.
33. Robillard, A. (1996). Anger in-the-social-order. Body and Society,2(1), 17–30.
34. Robillard, A. (1999). Wild phenomena and disability jokes. Body and Society,5(4), 61–65.
35. Schillmeier, M. (2010). Rethinking disability: bodies, senses, things. New York: Routledge.
36. Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world (R. M. Zaner, & T. J. Engelhardt, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
37. Shaw, J. A., & DeForge, R. T. (2012). Physiotherapy as bricolage: Theorizing expert practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice,28(6), 420–427.
38. Stratford, P., Gill, C., Westaway, M., & Binkley, J. (1995). Assessing disability and change on individual patients: A report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada,47, 4.
39. Straus, E. (1952). The upright posture. Psychiatric Quarterly,26(1), 529–561.
40. Titchkosky, T. (2001). From the field-coming out disabled: The politics of understanding. Disability Studies Quarterly,21(4), 131–139.
41. Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
42. Titchkosky, T., & Michalko, R. (2012). The body as the problem of individuality: A phenomenological disability studies approach. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New directions and developments (pp. 127–142). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Toombs, S. K. (1995). The lived experience of disability. Human Studies,18, 9–23.
44. Trede, F. (2012). Emancipatory physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice,28(6), 466–473.