-
2
-
-
25844469667
-
Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations
-
[2]
-
[2] M. Birenbaum, Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Educ., vol. 33, pp. 71–84, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002985613176
-
(1997)
Higher Educ
, vol.33
, pp. 71-84
-
-
Birenbaum, M.1
-
4
-
-
27944453166
-
Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development
-
[4]
-
[4] R.J. Beck, N.L. Livne, and S.L. Bear, Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 28, pp. 221–244, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619760500268733
-
(2005)
Eur. J. Teach. Educ
, vol.28
, pp. 221-244
-
-
Beck, R.J.1
Livne, N.L.2
Bear, S.L.3
-
5
-
-
78449288693
-
The Bologna Process and Its Impact on University-Level Chemical Education in Europe
-
[5]
-
[5] G. Pinto, The Bologna Process and Its Impact on University-Level Chemical Education in Europe. J. Chem. Educ., vol. 87, pp. 1176–1182, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed1004257
-
(2010)
J. Chem. Educ
, vol.87
, pp. 1176-1182
-
-
Pinto, G.1
-
7
-
-
0039581942
-
Cognitive Processes Contemporary Paradigms of Learning
-
[7] in Sutherland P., Sterling VA, Kogan
-
[7] J. Mezirow, Cognitive Processes Contemporary Paradigms of Learning, in Sutherland P., Adult Learning: A Reader. Sterling VA, Kogan, 1998.
-
(1998)
Adult Learning: A Reader
-
-
Mezirow, J.1
-
8
-
-
41549124056
-
Make sense of nanochemistry and nanotechnology
-
[8]
-
[8] P. Ambrogi, M. Caselli, M. Montalti, and M. Venturi, Make sense of nanochemistry and nanotechnology, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 9, pp. 5–10, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b801285g
-
(2008)
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract
, vol.9
, pp. 5-10
-
-
Ambrogi, P.1
Caselli, M.2
Montalti, M.3
Venturi, M.4
-
9
-
-
77953017668
-
Protein-Sequencing Jigsaw
-
[9]
-
[9] C.M. Davis-McGibony, Protein-Sequencing Jigsaw. J. Chem. Educ., vol. 87, pp. 409–411, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed8001144
-
(2010)
J. Chem. Educ
, vol.87
, pp. 409-411
-
-
Davis-McGibony, C.M.1
-
10
-
-
77954666788
-
Collaborative learning in teaching information management
-
[10]
-
[10] N. Natho, L. Knipping, O. Pfeiffer, C. Schröder, E. Zorn, and S. Jeschke. Collaborative learning in teaching information management. Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, pp. 405–413, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.483278
-
(2010)
Eur. J. Eng. Educ
, vol.35
, pp. 405-413
-
-
Natho, N.1
Knipping, L.2
Pfeiffer, O.3
Schröder, C.4
Zorn, E.5
Jeschke, S.6
-
11
-
-
79951710769
-
Learning through teaching and sharing in the jigsaw classroom
-
[11]
-
[11] A.M. Norintan, Learning through teaching and sharing in the jigsaw classroom. Ann. Dentistry, vol. 15, pp. 71–76, 2008.
-
(2008)
Ann. Dentistry
, vol.15
, pp. 71-76
-
-
Norintan, A.M.1
-
12
-
-
19644385871
-
Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students’ reported learning gains
-
[12]
-
[12] P.T. Terenzini, A.F. Cabrera, C.L. Colbeck, J.M. Parente, and S.A. Bjorkland, Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students’ reported learning gains. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, pp. 123–130, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00579.x
-
(2001)
J. Eng. Educ
, vol.90
, pp. 123-130
-
-
Terenzini, P.T.1
Cabrera, A.F.2
Colbeck, C.L.3
Parente, J.M.4
Bjorkland, S.A.5
-
13
-
-
0842263748
-
Active learning strategies to promote critical thinking
-
[13]
-
[13] S.E. Walker, Active learning strategies to promote critical thinking. J. Athletic Trainers, vol. 38, pp. 263–270, 2003.
-
(2003)
J. Athletic Trainers
, vol.38
, pp. 263-270
-
-
Walker, S.E.1
-
14
-
-
0035483498
-
A New Model for Computer Assisted Learning
-
[14]
-
[14] T. Wolfskill, and D. Hanson, A New Model for Computer Assisted Learning. J. Chem. Educ., vol. 78, pp. 1417–1424, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1417
-
(2001)
J. Chem. Educ
, vol.78
, pp. 1417-1424
-
-
Wolfskill, T.1
Hanson, D.2
-
16
-
-
69249166067
-
Blended Instruction: Adapting Conventional Instruction for Large Classes
-
[16] Retieved from
-
[16] G.E. Marsh, A.C. McFadden, Price, B.J. Blended Instruction: Adapting Conventional Instruction for Large Classes. Online J. Distance Learning Administration 2003, Retieved from http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/winter64/marsh64.htm
-
(2003)
Online J. Distance Learning Administration
-
-
Marsh, G.E.1
McFadden, A.C.2
Price, B.J.3
-
17
-
-
79951686429
-
Experience of cooperative learning in engineering
-
[17]
-
[17] R. Maceiras, M.A. Cancela A. Sánchez, and S. Urréjola. Experience of cooperative learning in engineering. Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, pp. 13–19, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.518232
-
(2011)
Eur. J. Eng. Educ
, vol.36
, pp. 13-19
-
-
Maceiras, R.1
Cancela, M.A.2
Sánchez, A.3
Urréjola, S.4
-
19
-
-
70349297674
-
In-Class Debates: Fertile Ground for Active Learning and the Cultivation of Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Skills
-
[19]
-
[19] R. Kennedy, In-Class Debates: Fertile Ground for Active Learning and the Cultivation of Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Skills. Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ., vol. 19, pp. 183–190, 2007.
-
(2007)
Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ
, vol.19
, pp. 183-190
-
-
Kennedy, R.1
-
20
-
-
84864690533
-
Aplicación de Nuevas Tecnologías en la Docencia Universitaria
-
[20]
-
[20] R. Maceiras, A. Cancela, and V. Goyanes, Aplicación de Nuevas Tecnologías en la Docencia Universitaria, Formación Universitaria, vol. 3, pp. 21–26, 2009.
-
(2009)
Formación Universitaria
, vol.3
, pp. 21-26
-
-
Maceiras, R.1
Cancela, A.2
Goyanes, V.3
-
22
-
-
84976952726
-
Teaching psychology through an instructor-debate format
-
[22]
-
[22] L. Lewin, and J. Wakefield, Teaching psychology through an instructor-debate format. Teach. Psychol., vol. 10, pp. 115–116, 1983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1002_20
-
(1983)
Teach. Psychol
, vol.10
, pp. 115-116
-
-
Lewin, L.1
Wakefield, J.2
-
23
-
-
28044447923
-
Increasing student involvement in the learning process through debate on controversial topics
-
[23]
-
[23] R. Berdine, Increasing student involvement in the learning process through debate on controversial topics. J. Marketing Educ., vol. 9, pp. 6–8, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027347538700900303
-
(1987)
J. Marketing Educ
, vol.9
, pp. 6-8
-
-
Berdine, R.1
|