Next steps in the development of ecological soil clean-up values for metals

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 342-345

  Wentsel, Randall ^a   Fairbrother, Anne ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clean up values; Metals; Regulatory; Soil; Workshop

Indexed keywords

METAL; SOIL POLLUTANT;

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTANT; STANDARDS; TOXICITY;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; METALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 84911943532     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1451     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Checkai R, Van Genderen E, Paulo Sousa J, Stephenson G, Smolders E. 2013. Deriving site-specific clean-up criteria to protect ecological receptors (plants and soil invertebrates) exposed to Soil contaminants via the direct contact exposure pathway. Integr Environ Assess Manag (this issue).
2. [EEC] European Economic Community. 2008a. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Appendix R.7.13-2: Environmental risk assessment for metals and metal compounds. European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland. 78 pp.
3. [EEC] European Economic Community. 2008b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7c: Endpoint specific guidance. European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland. ECHA-12-G-23-EN. 239 pp.
4. Fairbrother A, Wentsel R, Sappington K, Wood W. 2007. Framework for metals risk assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 68:145-227.
5. Greenberg MS, Schoeters I, Wentsel RS, Charters DW, Mitchell IA, Zajdlik B. 2013. Regulatory considerations for the potential development and application of metal clean-up values. Integr Environ Assess Manag (this issue).
6. Mayfield D, Johnson M, Burris J, Fairbrother A. 2013. Regulatory considerations for the potential development and application of metal clean up values. Integr Environ Assess Manag (this issue).
7. Mayfield DB, Fairbrother A. 2012. Efforts to standardize wildlife toxicity values remain unrealized. Integr Environ Assess Manage 9:114-123.
8. Merrington G, Schoeters I. 2010. Soil quality standards for trace elements. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. 159 p.
9. [NEPC] National Environmental Protection Council. 2011a. National Environmental Protection Council Measures 2011-Guideline on methodology to derive ecological investigation levels in contaminated soils, Schedule B5b. Canberra, Australia: NEPC.
10. [NEPC] National Environmental Protection Council. 2011b. National Environmental Protection Council Measures 2011-Guideline on soil quality guidelines for arsenic, chromium (III), copper, DDT, lead, naphthalene, nickel & zinc, Schedule B5c. Canberra, Australia: NEPC.
11. Sample B, Schlekat C, Spurgeon DJ, Menzie C, Rauscher J, Adams W. 2013. Recommendations to improve wildlife exposure estimation for development of soil screening and cleanup values. Integr Environ Assess Manag (this issue).
12. Siciliano SD, Kuperman RG, Roembe J, Oorts K. 2013. Deriving site-specific soil clean-up values using soil microbial process. Integr Environ Assess Manag (this issue).
13. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Soil screening guidance: Technical background document. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA/540/R-95/128.
14. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Generic ecological assessment endpoints (GEAEs) for use in risk assessment. Washington, DC: EPA Office of the Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/P-02/004F.
15. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. OSWER Directive 9285. 7-55.
16. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Framework for metals risk assessment. EPA 120/R-07/001 (March 2007). Washington, DC: EPA Office of the Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum. OSWER Directive 9285. 7-55.