Stakeholder engagement in public natural resource management

Proceedings - 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Bold Visions for Environmental Modeling, iEMSs 2014

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 1077-1084

  Ormsbee, Lindell ^a   Kipp, Jim ^a   Hoover, Anna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based participatory communication; Engagement; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL STORAGE; RISK PERCEPTION;

AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEMS; COMMUNITY-BASED; ENGAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDERS; UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY;

NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84911940529     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 5, 216-224.
2. Dietz, T., & Stern, P.C. (Eds.). (2008). Panel on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making: Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.
3. Bailey, K., & Grossardt, T. (2006). Addressing the Arnstein Gap: Improving public confidence in transportation planning and design through Structured Public Involvement (SPI). In Schrenk, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International GeoMultimedia Symposium, 11, 337-341. Vienna, Austria: CORP2006.
4. Bailey, K., Blandford, B., Grossardt, T., & Ripy, J. (2011). Planning, technology, and legitimacy: Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(3), 447-467.
5. Beierle, T.C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
6. Boholm, P. (2008). The public meeting as a theatre of dissent: Risk and hazard in land use planning. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1), 119-140.
7. EPA (1996). Watershed Approach Framework, EPA 840-S-96-001, Office of Water, Washington D.C.
8. Chess, C., and Hance, B. J., Gibson, G., "Adaptive Participation in Watershed Management." Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55(3) 248-256.
9. Conway, T.M. (2002). Getting Watershed Management to Work: A Framework for Understanding Interorganizational Relationships". Middle States Geographer 35: 1-12.
10. Johnson, N, Ravnborg, H.M, Westerman, O, and Probst, K. (2002). "User participation in watershed management and research." Water Policy 3(6): 507-520.
11. Lu, L. (2003). "The strategy of watershed management and public participation." Proc., Third International Conference on Watershed Management, ASCE, Va., 231-242.
12. Ormsbee, L. and McAlister, M., (2013) "Evolution of a Watershed-Management Framework in the Kentucky River Basin, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management.
13. Rydin, Y., & M. Pennington. (2000). Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environment, 5(2), 153-69.
14. Watkins, D. W., and Paladino, A. M. (2001). "Educating Stakeholders for Involvement in Watershed Planning and Management." Proc., Bridging the Gap: Meeting the World's Water And Environmental Resources Challenges, ASCE, 1-9.
15. Webler, T., and Tuler, S. (2001). "Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning: Views on Process from People in the Field." Human Ecology Review, 9(2), 29-39.
16. Shirey, P., Rose F., and Frie, S., (2005). "Public involvement in Fairfax County's watershed management program: the Little Hunting Creek watershed project." Proc., Managing W atersheds for Human and Natural Impacts, VA, 1-10.