Everyday-like memory and its cognitive correlates in healthy older adults and in young patients with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study based on virtual reality

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 463-473

  Arvind Pala, P ^a   N'Kaoua, B ^a,b   Mazaux, J M ^a,c   Simion, A ^c   Lozes, S ^c   Sorita, E ^a,c   Sauzeon H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

^c BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Aging; Everyday memory; Executive and memory functioning; Subjective memory complaints; Traumatic brain injury; Virtual reality based assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PILOT STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PILOT PROJECTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84911901703     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2014.941952     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Magnussen S, Heilstrup T, eds. Everyday memory. Hove and New York: Psychological Press; 2007.
2. Davies GM, Thompson DM, eds. Memory in context: context in memory. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
3. Flicker C, Ferris SH, Reisberg B. A longitudinal study of cognitive function in elderly persons with subjective memory complaints. J Geriatr Psych Neurol 1993;41:1029-32.
4. Jamora CW, Young A, Ruff FM. Comparison of subjective memory complaints with neuropsychological tests in individuals with mild vs more severe traumatic brain injuries. Brain Injury 2012;26:36-47.
5. Calabria M, Manenti R, Rosini S, et al. Objective and subjective memory impairment in elderly adults: a revised version of the Everyday Memory Questionnaire. Aging Clin Exp Res 2011;23:67-73.
6. Ossher L, Flegal KE, Lustig C. Everyday memory errors in older adults. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 2013;20:220-42.
7. Kinsella G, Murtagh D, Landry A, et al. Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996;10:499-507.
8. Schmand B, Jonker C, Geerlings MI, Lindeboom J. Subjectivememory complaints in the elderly: depressive symptoms and future dementia. Br J Psychiat 1997;171:373-6.
9. Saykin AJ, Wishart HA, Rabin LA, et al. Older adults with cognitive complaints show brain atrophy similar to that of amnestic MCI. Neurology 2006;67:834-42.
10. Nilsson L-G, Larsson M. Self-referent beliefs about memory and actual performance: relationship with age and sex. In: Magnussen S, Heilstrup T, eds. Everyday memory. Hove and New York: Psychology Press; 2007:275-89.
11. Franzen MD, Wilhelm KL. Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. Delray Beach (FL) England: Gr Press/St Lucie Press, Inc; 1996:91-112.
12. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological testing: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev 2003;13:181-97.
13. Beaudoin M, Desrichard O. Are memory self-efficacy and memory performance related? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2011;137:211-41.
14. Sedikides C, Gregg AP. Self-enhancement: food for thought. Perspect Psychol Sci 2008;3:102-16.
15. Hertzog C. Metacognition in older adults: implications for application. In: Perfect TJ, Schwartz BL, eds. Applied meta-cognition. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2002:169-96.
16. Schiehser DM, Delis DC, Filoteo JV, et al. Are self-reported symptoms of executive dysfunction associated with objective performance following mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2011;33:704-14.
17. Bolla KI, Lindgren KN, Binaccorsy C, Bleeker ML. Memory complaints in older adults: fact or fiction? JAMA Neurol 1991;48:61-4.
18. Gass CS, Apple C. Cognitive complaints in closed head injury: relationship to memory test performance and emotional disturbance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997;19:290-9.
19. Pearman A, Storandt M. Predictors of subjective memory in older adults. J Gerontol Ser B 2004;59:4-6.
20. Reid LM, McLullich AM. Subjective memory complaints and cognitive impairment in older people. Dementia Geriatr Cognit Dis 2006;22:471-85.
21. Martins IP, Mares I, Stilwell PA. How subjective are subjective language complaints. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:666-71.
22. Volz-Sidiropoulou E, Gauggel S. Do subjective measures of attention and memory predict actual performance? Metacognition in older couples. Psychology Aging 2012;22:440-50.
23. van Zomeren AH, van den Burg W. Residual complaints of patients two years of severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1985;48:21-8.
24. Richardson AE, Montello DR, Hegarty M. Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps, and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory Cognit 1999;27:741-50.
25. Wolbers T, Hegarty M. What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cognit Sci 2010;14:138-46.
26. Taillade M, Sauzéon H, Déjos M, et al. Executive and memory correlates of age-related differences in wayfinding performances using a virtual reality application. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 2013;20:298-319.
27. Cushman LA, Stein K, Duffy C.J. Detecting navigational deficits in aging and Alzheimer's disease using virtual reality. Neurology 2008;71:888-95.
28. Sorita E, N'Kaoua B, Larrue F, et al. Do patients with traumatic brain injury learn a route in the same way in real and virtual environments? Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1371-9.
29. Arciniegas DB, Held K, Wagner P. Cognitive impairment following traumatic brain injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2002;4:43-57.
30. McCullagh S, Feinstein A. Cognitive changes. In: Silver JM, McAllister TW, Yudofsky SC, eds. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2011:279-94.
31. Levine B, Stuss DT, Milberg WP. Effects of aging on conditional associative learning: process analyses and comparison with focal frontal lesions. Neuropsychology 1997;11:367-81.
32. Stuss DT, Craik FIM, Sayer L, et al. Comparison of older people and patients with frontal lesions: evidence from word list learning. Psychol Aging 1996;11:387-95.
33. Crawford JR, Bryan J, Luszcz MA, et al. The executive decline hypothesis of cognitive aging: do executive deficits qualify as differential deficits and do they mediate age-related memory decline? Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 2000;7:9-31.
34. West RL. An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol Bull 1996;120:272-92.
35. 15O positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 2002;73:173-81.
36. Kliegel M, Eschen A, Thöne-Otto AIT. Planning and realization of complex intentions in traumatic brain injury and normal aging. Brain Cognit 2004;56:43-54.
37. Vakil E, & Tweedy, JR. Memory for temporal order and spatial position information: test of the automatic-effortful distinction. Neuropsych, Neuropsychol, Behav Neurol, 1994;7:281-8.
38. Ozen LJ, Skinner EI, Fernandes MA. Rejecting familiar distracters during recognition in young adults with traumatic brain injury and in healthy older adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2010;16:556-65.
39. Constantinidou F, Baker S. Stimulus modality and verbal learning performance in normal aging. Brain Lang 2002;82:296-311.
40. Haut M, Shutty MS. Patterns of verbal learning after closed head injury. Neuropsychology 1992;6:51-8.
41. Ebert PL, Anderson ND. Memory interference in young adults, healthy older adults, and older adults with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009;15:83-93.
42. Hasher L, Chung C, May CP, Foong N. Age, time of testing, and proactive interference. Can J Exp Psychol 2002;56:200-7.
43. Brooks DN. Recognition memory and head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1974;37:794-801.
44. Craik FIM, McDowd JM. Age differences in recall and recognition. J Exp Psychol 1987;13:473-9.
45. Craik FIM, Morris LW, Morris RG, Loewen ER. Relations between source amnesia and frontal lobe functioning in older adults. Psychol Aging 1990;5:148-51.
46. Dywan J, Segalowitz SJ, Henderson D, Jacoby L. Memory for source after traumatic brain injury. Brain Cognit 1993;21:20-43.
47. Delis DC, Massman PJ, Butters N, et al. Profiles of demented and amnesic patients on the California Verbal Learning Test: implication for the assessment of memory disorders. Psychol Assess 1991;3:19-26.
48. Salthouse TA. The processing speed theory of cognitive aging. Psychol Rev 1996;103:403-28.
49. Felmingham KL, Baguley IJ, Green AM. Effects of diffuse axonal injury on speed of information processing following severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2004;18:564-71.
50. Baudoin A, Clarys D, Vanneste S, Isingrini, M. Executive functioning and processing speed in age-related differences in memory: contribution of a coding task. Brain Cognit 2009;71:240-5.
51. Lee T, Crawford JD, Henry JD, et al. Mediating effects of processing speed and executive functions in age-related differences in episodic memory performance: a cross-validation study. Neuropsychology 2012;26:776-84.
52. Bugaiska A, Clarys D, Jarry C, et al. The effect of aging in recollective experience: the processing speed and executive functioning hypothesis. Conscious Cognit 2007;16:797-808.
53. Sauzéon H, Arvind Pala P, Larrue F, et al. The use of virtual reality for episodic memory assessment: effects of active navigation. Exp Psychol 2012;59:99-108.
54. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
55. Lucas JA, Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, et al. Normative data for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998;20:536-47.
56. Green RC, Woodard JL, Green J. Validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale for detection of cognitive impairment in elderly. J Neuropsy Clin Neurosci 1995;7:357-60.
57. Matteau E, Dupré N, Langlois M, et al. Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2: screening for MCI and dementia. Am J Alzheimer's Disease Demen 2011;26:389-98.
58. Veterans Health Initiative. Traumatic brain injury; 2010. Available from: http://www.publichealth.va.gov/docs/vhi/traumatic-brain-injury-vhi.pdf [last accessed April 2010].
59. Campbell N, Boustani M, Limbil T, et al. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. Clin Intervent Aging 2009;4:225-33.
60. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 1974;304:81-4.
61. Moffat SD, Zonderman AB, Resnick S. Age differences in spatial memory in a virtual environment navigation task. Neurobiol Aging 2001;22:787-96.
62. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviation Psychol 1993;3:203-20.
63. Reitan RM. The trail making test: manual for administration and scoring. Tucson: Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1992.
64. Stuss DT, Bisshop SM, Alexander MP, et al. The Trail Making Test: a study in focal lesion patients. Psychol Assess 2001;13:230-9.
65. Stroop J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935;18:643-62.
66. Stuss DT, Floden D, Alexander MP, et al. Stroop performance in forcal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 2001;39:771-86.
67. Vendrell P, Junqué C, Pujol J, et al. The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task. Neuropsyhologia 1995;33:341-52.
68. Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale-III. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
69. Clément F, Belleville S, Gauthier S. Cognitive complaint in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2008;14:222-32.
70. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Verbal Test: adult version manual. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 1987.
71. Budson AE, Daffner KR, Desikan R, Schacter DL. When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: gist-based memory distortion in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 2000;14:277-87.
72. Lieury A, Iff M, Duris P. Normes d'associations verbales, Document ronéoté [verbal association norms, ronéo té document]. Boulogne-Billancourt, France: Laboratoire de Psychologie expérimentale; 1976.
73. Alario F-X, Ferrand L. A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behav Res Meth Instru Computers 1999;31:531-52.
74. Stricker JL, Brown GG, Wixted J, et al. New semantic and serial clustering indices for the California verbal learning test-second edition: background, rationale, & formulae. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8:425-35.
75. Bryan J, Luszcz MA. Speed of information processing as a mediator between age and free recall performance. Psychol Aging 1996;11:3-9.
76. Kramer JH, Rosen HJ, Du A-T, et al. Dissociation of hippocampal and frontal contributions to episodic memory performance. Neuropsychology 2005;19:799-805.
77. Kruger LE, Salthouse TA. Influence of cognitive abilities and age on word recall performance across trials and list segments. Am J Psychol 2011;124:291-300.
78. Paolo AM, Tröster AI, Ryan JJ. California Verbal Learning Test: normative data for the elderly. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997;19:220-34.
79. Pierce BH, Sullivan AL, Schacter DL, Budson AE. Comparing source-based and gist-based false recognition in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 2005;19:411-19.
80. Plancher G, Guyard A, Nicolas S, Piolino P. Mechanisms underlying the production of false memories for famous people's names in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:2527-36.
81. Taillade M, Sauzéon H, Déjos M, et al. Age-related wayfinding differences in real large-scale environments: detrimental motor control effects during spatial learning are mediated by executive decline? PLoS ONE 2013;8:e67193. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067193.
82. Braver TS, West R. Working memory, executive control, and aging. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. The handbook of aging and cognition. Hove: Psychology Press; 2008:311-72.
83. DeLuca J, Schultheis MT, Madigan NK, et al. Acquisition versus retrieval deficits in traumatic brain injury: implications for memory rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1327-33.
84. Brooks BL, Weaver LE, Scialfa CT. Does impaired executive functioning differentially impact verbal memory measures in older adults with suspected dementia? Clin Neuropsychol 2006;20:230-42.
85. Vakil E. The effect of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury on different aspects of memory: a selective review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005;27:977-1021.
86. Troyer AK, Graves RE, Cullum CM. Executive functioning as a mediator of the relationship between age and episodic memory in healthy aging. Aging Cognition 1994;1:45-53.
87. Baldo JV, Delis D, Kramer J, Shimamura AP. Memory performance on the California Verbal Learning Test-II: findings from patients with focal frontal lesions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8:539-46.
88. Gallo DA. Associative illusions of memory: research on false memory for related events. New York: Psychology Press; 2006.
89. Dywan J, Segalowitz SJ, Williamson L. Source monitoring during name recognition in older adults: psychometric and electrophysiological correlates. Psychology Aging 1994;9:568-77.
90. Plancher G, Gyselinck V, Nicolas S, Piolino, P. Age effect on components of episodic memory and feature binding: a virtual reality study. Neuropsychology 2010;24:379-90.
91. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Seelye AM. Recovery of content and temporal order memory for performed activities following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsycholo 2012;34:256-68.
92. Anderson JW, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Predictions of episodic memory following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury during inpatient rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2009;31:425-38.
93. Chiou KS, Carlson RA, Arnett PA, et al. Metacognitive monitoring in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2011;17:720-31.
94. Anderson SW, Tranel D. Awareness of disease states following cerebral infarction, dementia, and head trauma: standardized assessment. Clin Neuropsychol 1989;3:327-39.
95. Chiou KS, Hillary FG. Benefits or order: the influence of item sequencing on metacognition in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012;18:379-83.
96. Scherer, M. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairment. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Company; 2012.
97. Ehlhardt LA, Sohlberg MM, Glang A, Albin R. TEACH-M: a pilot study evaluating an instructional sequence for persons with impaired memory and executive functions. Brain Injury 2005;19:569-83.
98. Ehlhardt LA, Sohlberg MM, Kennedy M, et al.Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years? Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18:300-42.
99. Rogers WA, Fisk AD. Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. J Gerontol: Psycholog Sci 2010;65B:645-53.
100. Morrow DG, Rogers WA. Environmental support: an integrative framework. Human Fact 2008;50:589-613.
101. Lemoncello R, Sohlberg MM, Fickas S, Prideaux J. A randomised controlled crossover trial evaluating Television Assisted Prompting (TAP) for adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011;21:825-46.