BCI-FES: Could a new rehabilitation device hold fresh promise for stroke patients?

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 537-539

  Young, Brittany M ^a   Williams, Justin ^a   Prabhakaran, Vivek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface; FES; Functional electrical stimulation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION; IRON; MEDICAL COMPUTING; POPULATION STATISTICS;

AGING POPULATION; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRI-CAL STIMULATIONS; MEDICAL ADVANCES; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; REHABILITATION DEVICES; STROKE; STROKE PATIENTS; STROKE SURVIVORS;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE TONE; NERVE STIMULATOR; NEUROFEEDBACK; NEUROMODULATION; PARESIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; REWARD; ROBOTICS; STROKE PATIENT; SURVIVOR; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; ELECTROTHERAPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; PARALYSIS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; STROKE; TRENDS;

BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; PARALYSIS; STROKE;

EID: 84911891096     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2014.941811     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;129(3):e28-92
2. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, et al. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8(4):355-69
3. Lackland DT, Roccella EJ, Deutsch AF, et al. Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: a statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45(1):315-53
4. Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, et al. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med 2011;43(10):951-7
5. Prasad G, Herman P, Coyle D, et al. Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:60
6. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010;41(10):2402-48
7. Kawashima N, Popovic MR, Zivanovic V. Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke. Physiother Can 2013;65(1):20-8
8. Wang RY. Neuromodulation of effects of upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion by functional electric stimulation (FES). Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007;97(Pt 1):381-5
9. Taylor P, Humphreys L, Swain I. The long-term cost-effectiveness of the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation for the correction of dropped foot due to upper motor neuron lesion. J Rehabil Med 2013;45(2):154-60
10. Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Demain SH, et al. Translation of evidence-based Assistive Technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users' perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:124
11. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 2008;39(3):910-17
12. Takahashi M, Takeda K, Otaka Y, et al. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9:56
13. Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, et al. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann Neurol 2013;74(1):100-8
14. Wilson JA, Walton LM, Tyler M, Williams J. Lingual electrotactile stimulation as an alternative sensory feedback pathway for brain-computer interface applications. J Neural Eng 2012;9(4)):045007
15. Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Nair VA, et al. Case report: post-stroke interventional BCI rehabilitation in an individual with preexisting sensorineural disability. Front Neuroeng 2014;7:18
16. Daly JJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(11):1032-43
17. Richards LG, Stewart KC, Woodbury ML, et al. Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS. Neuropsychologia 2008;46(1):3-11
18. Song J, Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, et al. Characterizing Relationships of DTI, fMRI, and Motor Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation Utilizing Brain-Computer Interface Technology. Fronti Neuroeng 2014;7:22
19. Shindo K, Fujiwara T, Hara J, et al. Effectiveness of hybrid assistive neuromuscular dynamic stimulation therapy in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25(9):830-7
20. Mukaino M, Ono T, Shindo K, et al. Efficacy of brain-computer interface-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation for chronic paresis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2014;46(4):378-82