High and low contact frequency cardiac rehabilitation programmes elicit similar improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular risk factors

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1456-1464

  LaHaye, Stephen A ^a   Lacombe, Shawn P ^a   Koppikar, Sahil ^a   Lun, Grace ^a   Parsons, Trisha L ^a   Hopkins Rosseel, Diana ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation; cardiorespiratory fitness; cardiovascular risk factors; coronary artery disease; exercise; frequency; myocardial infarction; on site; RARE score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DISEASE; HEART REHABILITATION; HIGH CONTACT FREQUENCY HEART REHABILITATION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LOW CONTACT FREQUENCY HEART REHABILITATION; LOW RISK PATIENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE; AGE; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART DISEASES; KINESIOTHERAPY; LUNG; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; EXERCISE THERAPY; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; LUNG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84911890620     PISSN: 20474873     EISSN: 20474881     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2047487313497604     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Weintraub WS. Do more cardiac rehabilitation visits reduce events compared with fewer visits?. Circulation. 2010 ; 121: 8-9
2. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2004 ; 116: 682-692
3. Jolliffe JA, Rees K, Taylor RS, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000 ;: 001800-001800
4. Taylor RS, Dalal H, Jolly K, et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 ;: 007130-007130
5. Burke LE, Dunbar-Jacob JM, Hill MN. Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: a review of the research. Ann Behav Med. 1997 ; 19: 239-263
6. Davies P, Taylor F, Beswick A, et al. Promoting patient uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 ; ((7). CD007131 - CD007131
7. Ades PA. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2001 ; 345: 892-902
8. Neubeck L, Freedman SB, Clark AM, et al. Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 ; 19: 494-503
9. Suskin N, MacDonald S, Swabey T, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention services in ontario: recommendations from a consensus panel. Can J Cardiol. 2003 ; 19: 833-838
10. Jolly K, Taylor R, Lip GY, et al. The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: Cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technol Assess. 2007 ; 11: 1-118
11. Oerkild B, Frederiksen M, Hansen JF, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is as effective as centre-based cardiac rehabilitation among elderly with coronary heart disease: results from a randomised clinical trial. Age Ageing. 2011 ; 40: 78-85
12. Dalal HM, Evans PH, Campbell JL, et al. Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: a randomized trial with preference arms - Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS). Int J Cardiol. 2007 ; 119: 202-211
13. Karapolat H, Demir E, Bozkaya YT, et al. Comparison of hospital-based versus home-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: effects on functional capacity, quality of life, psychological symptoms, and hemodynamic parameters. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009 ; 98: 635-642
14. Reid RD, Dafoe WA, Morrin L, et al. Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2005 ; 149: 862-868
15. Hemmelgarn BR, Zarnke KB, Campbell NR, et al. Canadian Hypertension Education Program, Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. The 2004 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part I blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Can J Cardiol 2004; 20: 31-40.
16. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 8 th ed. Chicago: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2009. Chicago: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins ; 2009 :
17. Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA, et al. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly medicare beneficiaries. Circulation. 2010 ; 121: 63-70